I should have expanded my comments. In the discussion of the betting markets last week there was talk about setting up such an article as the one of Fox News. Yes, definitely not biased, but I thought the thread did a good job talking about some of the big moves in the betting market.
Believe me, if he wins he will do a lot to the Muslims. It is a virtual certainty.
“Birds aren’t real.”Dominion voting machines know
I’ve decided my new response to conspiracy theories is to lean into them and those paranoid enough to believe them will get so stressed out that they won’t bother the rest of us.
This is 100% where I am as well.
That never gets old.
At the bottom of that guy's website "Copyright 2022, FTX Trading Ltd" (which is probably never true.) His partner seems to be doing an Alex Jones lite internet show that he co-created. This would seem to play into the belief that those betting market are being manipulated. No saying there might not be something in the betting market but I won't take that guys word for it.Speaking of the betting markets, here is a Fox News article that talks about how much better the betting markets are at predicting the winner than the polls.
What are election betting odds? Expert explains why Trump is current favorite
Maxim Lott of ElectionBettingOdds.com explained election betting markets to Fox News Digital and how they can be a better predictor of the outcome than polls.www.foxnews.com
Their ONLY hope is to depress turnout. They think it will depress the Ds, it could just as well motivate them that they have to vote. Especially since they can't show Trump with a huge lead since that would be laughed at, so the best they can do is make it look close which works against their intentions. They're not smart, but they've also got a limited playbook.
Ummm..nope. As long as my side wins it can be as close as it needs to be.
My point is that if it’s close the Right will fight tooth and nail, and we will probably see something worse than January 6. But if either side wins big, I think that will chill some of the rhetoric and violence. So I hope one side wins big just for the sake of some measure of peace.
Interesting numbers. Would be curious to know how that compares to results after 10 days of early voting in Pennsylvania in 2020 (although might not be all that indicative given COVID).
Big voter, the Llama.
I know Rosenberg's project is actually called "Hopium" but it's hard to argue with his general analysis, given the backup he provides. It's just not really made any logical sense, when Trump continues to generally have at best neutral weeks out on the campaign trail and there's been no cataclysmic October surprise driving Harris into a ditch, that he's suddenly been surging all over the place. Rosenberg's point is that Harris seems to be leading but narrowly in the places that she needs to win, and the race stabilized back in August and hasn't really changed much since.
Big spitter, too.
The question is how many are willing to take action. Jan 6th was a few thousand people willing to commit violence and for that folks gathered from around the nation. Most of those are now in jail. Around the country a few folks tried to actually protest, but AFAIK, nothing much happened with those protests and certainly no violence that I'm aware of.
If Trump hopefully losses and his merry band of idiots does resort to violence, I do agree that I am more comfortable that Biden is president so will be prepared and will not hesitate to take action against them. Don't bring a knife to a gun fight. I am very, very against violence, but you do what you have to do.
