I always figured the Dalai Lama had a sense of humor.Buddhists giggle at you.
I always figured the Dalai Lama had a sense of humor.Buddhists giggle at you.
Buddhists giggle at you.
Well the reason that Dems have been getting their butts handed to them is because they been underestimating their counterparts for decades. Impartial people can see the double standard that the parties are help to. They have been following a rule book that was thrown out ages ago and failed to adapt.You can say they are banking on people reverting to their better nature but have them meet us?I think you’re missing the bigger point, which is that polling indicates that ~90% of DEMOCRATS also don’t seem to think “threats to democracy” are a high priority issue in this election. And that is truly baffling.
Also, while clearly not on the same level as Project 2025, there are certainly some unhelpful data points on Democrats out there (e.g., Letitia James as a candidate vowing to “get” then sitting President Trump, Hillary and John Kerry talking about curtailing the First Amendment, the Twitter Files Congressional hearings in which Democratic panel members managed to do the unthinkable and make Jim Jordan seem like the adult in the room, etc.). All fodder to fire up the MAGA true believers.
Dems have been getting their butts handed to them? I must have missed something. I thought Dems did quite well in 2020 and 2022.Well the reason that Dems have been getting their butts handed to them is because they been underestimating their counterparts for decades. Impartial people can see the double standard that the parties are help to. They have been following a rule book that was thrown out ages ago and failed to adapt.You can say they are banking on people reverting to their better nature but have them meet us?
The forest for the trees. People pay less attention to the local and state levels where yes they have been getting their butts handed to them. Why do you think the GOP controls the House? State legislatures make the maps and there are more Rs in control at that level. Gerrymandering means they will be in power for at least the next half decade probably longer. Going down the ladder you have more Rs in control in local elections, school boards, etc. At the grassroots Dems aren’t in small and rural areas….areas that now have a disproportionate level of power. Even if somehow Trump loses the threat to US democracy is now baked into the system. People seem to think if Trump loses its over and we will return to “normal.” That’s not going to happen. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. People forgot that, got complacent and here we are today. How’s that to start everyone’s morning?Dems have been getting their butts handed to them? I must have missed something. I thought Dems did quite well in 2020 and 2022.
We may not be all that representative but my wife is a registered Republican and I’m independent- so hopefully there are more like us…Some point soon we will get past the polls and get some really good analysis on early voting. Interesting stuff going on in PA. I have read if the early vote difference gets somewhere between 400,000-500,000 it’s a tipping point that same day voting Rs will not be able to make up. The gap at the moment is 325,000 and that’s just the D vote. How many Rs will vote for Harris?
So per @Steven43 's feeling it's a lock that Harris wins and per yours it's a lock that Trump wins. So that should cancel out, though your post is probably some sort of attempt at a reverse jinx.At this point, it just feels inevitable that he’s going to win. I’m preparing for it.
Guess I better start looking at that pie list so I can figure out what I’m going to tell Steven to send me.
Yup. The polls show that preference between the two candidates is pretty even in most battleground states.I'm going with nobody knows yet and that it's pretty close.
My feeling is that the election won’t actually be that close. The problem being I have no idea which way it will go. But of the 7 swing states, I think the breakdown will be 7-0 or 6-1. I am just not confident in calling it either way(though I know which side I’m rooting for)Yup. The polls show that preference between the two candidates is pretty even in most battleground states.
Who actually turns out their voters the best will win each state. And that is truly unknowable until they start counting votes.
Dominion voting machines knowSo per @Steven43 's feeling it's a lock that Harris wins and per yours it's a lock that Trump wins. So that should cancel out, though your post is probably some sort of attempt at a reverse jinx.
I'm going with nobody knows yet and that it's pretty close.
So I can break it now? And we guffaw.Hindus don't giggle, they just go on a hunger strike when forgotten. (I knew I was missing one)
Just remember to vote early and vote often!Dominion voting machines know
I’ve decided my new response to conspiracy theories is to lean into them and those paranoid enough to believe them will get so stressed out that they won’t bother the rest of us.
Hallmark channel? Oh my!!I'm so mad right now, the death penalty ought to be on the table for these folks. They know exactly what they are doing.
How elderly dementia patients are unwittingly fueling political campaigns
A CNN investigation reveals how deceptive political fundraising has misled hundreds of elderly Americans.www.cnn.com
One of the biggest changes we made in my mother-in-laws quality of life was setting up her TV so that it is set to the Hallmark Channel when it turns on and getting her a RAZ Memory phone which among other great features allows us to whitelist phone numbers so now the only people able to call her are her sister, brother-in-law and her daughter and I. Oh, and taking away her car keys, checkbook and credit cards.
Doubt it. But given the alternative, it's the best choice out there. The worst was her asking about Christmas presents in July. /smdhHallmark channel? Oh my!!
She'll probably expect to find romance and get married within two weeks.
For Lott, looking at betting averages gives people a much clearer picture of what the most likely outcome of the election is compared to trying to piece together polls.
"These are really accurate, they’re more accurate than just trying to look at polls or especially more accurate than listening to pundits bloviating," Lott said.
"[The bettors] look at all sorts of historical data, they look at trends," he added. "I find the percent more useful than the polls."
Speaking of the betting markets, here is a Fox News article that talks about how much better the betting markets are at predicting the winner than the polls.
What are election betting odds? Expert explains why Trump is current favorite
Maxim Lott of ElectionBettingOdds.com explained election betting markets to Fox News Digital and how they can be a better predictor of the outcome than polls.www.foxnews.com