UrinalCake
Member
Congrats to the UNC Wilmington Seahawks for punching their ticket! At least we can say that one school from the UNC system made the tournament.
While I have no reason to not believe Andrea, it seems absolutely incredible to me that she doesn't know what a screen is.60 Minutes did not turn their back on the best coach in the sport.
Start at the 8:50 mark of the first video.
Jon Wertheim: "I suspect it's very helpful to have someone in this household who doesn't necessarily rip her hair out when the team misses a screen or someone misses an open jum--"
Andrea Hurley: "I don't even know what a screen is. I don't even know what that is."
Dan Hurley: "With the way that I'm wired --"
Jon Wertheim: "You don't know what a screen is?"
Dan Hurley: "She doesn't know. She's not playing for the camera. She has no idea."
Andrea Hurley: "I have no idea."
I get what you are trying to say, but the General Manager of Duke Men’s Basketball is most certainly a basketball person. More so than you or I or anyone else on this board, for sure.Do you know for sure that Rachel is doing this? I'd be surprised. She's not a basketball person. If anyone, this likely falls under Mike Schrage.
Integrate that into the thread where there is the discussion of the mis-use of the word "literally!"""The force of the blown call literally knocked me to the ground is how I'm trying to justify it," Hurley said on "60 Minutes.""
Oh please![]()
Here is Rachel's bio on Duke's website: Rachel Baker BioI get what you are trying to say, but the General Manager of Duke Men’s Basketball is most certainly a basketball person. More so than you or I or anyone else on this board, for sure.
She's just not. She's a brand manager from Nike. She has no experience coaching or evaluating talent. That's not why she was hired. But she's VERY good at what she does.I get what you are trying to say, but the General Manager of Duke Men’s Basketball is most certainly a basketball person. More so than you or I or anyone else on this board, for sure.
Oh I don’t think she was hired to scout portal targets. There are people that do that for free on the internet.She's just not. She's a brand manager from Nike. She has no experience coaching or evaluating talent. That's not why she was hired. But she's VERY good at what she does.
Yeah, I think we just have different definitions of "basketball person". She's in the basketball business for sure. But very different role than an NBA GM...Oh I don’t think she was hired to scout portal targets. There are people that do that for free on the internet.
I’m saying she was hired to play a high level role putting together the Duke roster and that being GM in and of itself makes her a basketball person.
Or maybe Baker could learn a thing or two about basketball by reading DBR?
They finish the game 1-31Gonzaga and St. Mary’s are a combined 1-26 for 3s. Man!
Gonzaga was out rebounded 48-27, was 1-15 from 3, and still won the game.They finish the game 1-31![]()
Oh I understood your point. Mine is that you might be assuming too much about what Rachel Baker does and doesn’t bring to the program.Yeah, I think we just have different definitions of "basketball person". She's in the basketball business for sure. But very different role than an NBA GM...
They had 4 turnovers to St. Mary's 18. Really weird game to watch.Gonzaga was out rebounded 48-27, was 1-15 from 3, and still won the game.
She's not a brand manager today. That was her background at Nike. She obviously has broader duties at Duke as GM that neither one of us have full visibility into.Oh I understood your point. Mine is that you might be assuming too much about what Rachel Baker does and doesn’t bring to the program.
Let me put this another way. Who do you think was on Kon Island first — you or Baker?
She was brought in as GM three years ago and the program has done amazing things since, including recruiting at a very high level from both high school and the portal.
I’m not going to write off Baker as a brand manager. That may be her background, but I’m guessing that she is pretty well steeped in Duke basketball.
At any rate, I am very happy that King and Scheyer have put together such a wonderful staff. I’d love to know more about the secret sauce of what they all do on a day-to-day basis, but I’m not holding my breath.
I don’t want to argue. We are aligned in loving this team and the program that is off to a great start following the end of the Krzyzewski era. It’s all good and let’s hope that this season keeps rolling and the next ones do too.She's not a brand manager today. That was her background at Nike. She obviously has broader duties at Duke as GM that neither one of us have full visibility into.
Seems like you want to argue about it. I'm not interested.
Hop Sing was on Bonanza.And has an assistant named Hop Sing.
I’ve been following your the posts about roster construction and want to add a few thoughts. I don’t think anyone on the Duke staff works in a silo and they all have probably learned a few things from one another. Therefore I am guessing the conversations on the staff are dynamic with everyone contributing to the talent discussion and NIL discussion.I don’t want to argue. We are aligned in loving this team and the program that is off to a great start following the end of the Krzyzewski era. It’s all good and let’s hope that this season keeps rolling and the next ones do too.
I think my outsider's understanding of Baker's duties is similar to yours, but it does seem like there are cases where division between court side and business side "basketball people" can be fuzzy. Rob Pelinka is a JD/MBA who had been a player agent for 20 years when the Lakers hired him to be GM. He played college hoops but had zero experience as a coach, scout, or front office executive before he started running the Lakers. The much maligned Nico Harrison was a Nike executive for two decades before he became Mavs GM.Yeah, I think we just have different definitions of "basketball person". She's in the basketball business for sure. But very different role than an NBA GM...