sagegrouse
Member
Verne's my homeboy, but Raftery makes the play seem like fun. IVerne Lundquist for me but Rafferty is right there with him.
Verne's my homeboy, but Raftery makes the play seem like fun. IVerne Lundquist for me but Rafferty is right there with him.
He did this at least twice - I noted it in the chat. Haters only hear his negativity towards Duke and conveniently ignore anything positive he might say. Selective hearing. Perhaps I have selective hearing in that all I hear are those whining about Bilas and it drives me nuts. He is far from perfect. He is over-exposed by ESPN so he has become a walking cliche. He makes mistakes. But he does not deserve all of the wrath he gets here.He balanced it out by saying Auburn should have been called for a foul (they were not) in that time dilation period with 2:30 left on the clock.
Yea, I agree with you here, CNC, and I'm no fan of JB, as mentioned in another thread). In my mind, his lack of bias towards Duke (if you want to call it that) is the least of his issues. Listening to last night's game, I realized (again) how much air time Jay takes up. I actually feel sorry for his play-by-play companion. I'm of the school that "less is more" and we don't need every single play to be analyzed ad nauseum. Viewers can watch the game and pretty much figure out what is going on. Basketball is not rocket science.He did this at least twice - I noted it in the chat. Haters only hear his negativity towards Duke and conveniently ignore anything positive he might say. Selective hearing. Perhaps I have selective hearing in that all I hear are those whining about Bilas and it drives me nuts. He is far from perfect. He is over-exposed by ESPN so he has become a walking cliche. He makes mistakes. But he does not deserve all of the wrath he gets here.
Well, shoot, I thought I was pretty balanced with my comment. I guess maybe it's just a taboo topic now.He did this at least twice - I noted it in the chat. Haters only hear his negativity towards Duke and conveniently ignore anything positive he might say. Selective hearing. Perhaps I have selective hearing in that all I hear are those whining about Bilas and it drives me nuts. He is far from perfect. He is over-exposed by ESPN so he has become a walking cliche. He makes mistakes. But he does not deserve all of the wrath he gets here.
He’s often right, but he’s also frequently wrong. He’s a smart guy but he doesn’t seem to broadcaster-adjudicate many calls correctly. Often wrong, but never in doubt.While we're on the subject of Jays, Bilas made another attempt at over-objectification yesterday, calling the swipe on Evan's head in mid-air "just a basketball play". Sorry, Jay, but that was the easiest F1 call in the history of F1 calls. On the other hand, I thought his commentary for last night's game was really good, so there's that.
That shot to the face and head of (wasn't it Sion?) would've been played repeatedly on Sportscenter and lots of other media outlets had it been a Duke player doing it to an opponent. Very easy flagrant call.I know he's one of ours, but Jay Williams has a lot a terrible takes. It's gotten to the point where I just tune him out.
While we're on the subject of Jays, Bilas made another attempt at over-objectification yesterday, calling the swipe on Evan's head in mid-air "just a basketball play". Sorry, Jay, but that was the easiest F1 call in the history of F1 calls. On the other hand, I thought his commentary for last night's game was really good, so there's that.
It is patronizing, and just helps propagate the myth that "Duke gets all the calls" - over compensation is ALWAYS a bad look.I noted several times where Bilas (as usual) over-compensated on his objectivity towards Duke. In other words, he took a position that gave the benefit of the doubt to the opponent so that no one can call him a Duke homer. I find it to be patronizing although I know many here will dissent.
My complaint with him, as have said before is that he talks too much. He should study Verne, the master of the pause. Every event in a game does not demand commentary.He did this at least twice - I noted it in the chat. Haters only hear his negativity towards Duke and conveniently ignore anything positive he might say. Selective hearing. Perhaps I have selective hearing in that all I hear are those whining about Bilas and it drives me nuts. He is far from perfect. He is over-exposed by ESPN so he has become a walking cliche. He makes mistakes. But he does not deserve all of the wrath he gets here.
My main objection to JB too, Indoor. He needs to take the "less is more" lesson in broadcasting school.My complaint with him, as have said before is that he talks too much. He should study Verne, the master of the pause. Every event in a game does not demand commentary.
There was a big NCAA tourney game a couple years ago (Furman beat Virginia) called by Kevin Harlan, Stan Van Gundy, and somebody else. Furman hit a 3pt after they stole the inbounds pass, and that put them up by 1 with about 2 seconds left. After a moment, Harlan motioned to Van Gundy and the other commentator to just be quiet and let the moment, including the crowd noise, speak for itself.My main objection to JB too, Indoor. He needs to take the "less is more" lesson in broadcasting school.
Dan Bonner was the 3rd. And Harlan had pretty much already blown his lungs out screaming.There was a big NCAA tourney game a couple years ago (Furman beat Virginia) called by Kevin Harlan, Stan Van Gundy, and somebody else. Furman hit a 3pt after they stole the inbounds pass, and that put them up by 1 with about 2 seconds left. After a moment, Harlan motioned to Van Gundy and the other commentator to just be quiet and let the moment, including the crowd noise, speak for itself.
Verne was the master, period....dude had amazing career with some of the biggest moments in sports...the Laettner game, as it's called, the 106 yard KO return Auburn versus Bama...and the week before that Auburn's hail mary pass to beat UGa....and in golf, he had Tiger's hang on the lip chip on the 16th.....etc....My complaint with him, as have said before is that he talks too much. He should study Verne, the master of the pause. Every event in a game does not demand commentary.
There was a big NCAA tourney game a couple years ago (Furman beat Virginia) called by Kevin Harlan, Stan Van Gundy, and somebody else. Furman hit a 3pt after they stole the inbounds pass, and that put them up by 1 with about 2 seconds left. After a moment, Harlan motioned to Van Gundy and the other commentator to just be quiet and let the moment, including the crowd noise, speak for itself.
Jay Bilas could find more opportunities to do just that, but specially when there are huge, loud moments at Cameron.
Dan Bonner was the 3rd. And Harlan had pretty much already blown his lungs out screaming.
Not that I think that clip is hilarious and watch it every few weeks for a laugh. (There’s also a version set to the song from Titanic that I also do not watch.)
IMO Bilas at first perhaps didn't see the arm hit the head. Sometimes it's hard to catch, I could give him that. His angle from the rafters isn't the TV angle. However, also IMO Bilas always wants to look like the smartest guy in the room. And he is loathe to admit he's wrong. So he didn't admit it. True, it was a basketball play. But you still can't hit someone in the head at all these days, both in the public eye and in the rulebook. In this case I think it was more his ego than any effort to avoid an appearance of bias. But yes, SMH over this.Haven't been on this site in years, just came here today to see if anybody else was as irritated by Bilas as I was, particularly over his doubling and tripling down on the obvious flagrant. I'm so done with that guy. I'd almost rather have an unapologetic Carolina homer like Kenny Smith calling a Duke game than listen to Bilas contort himself endlessly to avoid the appearance of bias.
And Jack Nicklaus's birdie putt on 17 to win the 1986 Masters, IIRC.Verne was the master, period....dude had amazing career with some of the biggest moments in sports...the Laettner game, as it's called, the 106 yard KO return Auburn versus Bama...and the week before that Auburn's hail mary pass to beat UGa....and in golf, he had Tiger's hang on the lip chip on the 16th.....etc....
But Schulman told Bilas, perhaps multiple times, that there was contact to the head. Bilas shrugged it off as the defender trying to go for the ball; that may have been his intent, but his execution resulted in him hitting the head of a defenseless player driving the hoop with two feet off the ground. Bilas went on to comment something to the extent of how it’s more difficult for James to land (one foot, two feet, blah blah doesn’t matter). He was wrong. It’s be so much better if he would admit when wrong instead of trying to double down and find some technicality to justify his initial position.IMO Bilas at first perhaps didn't see the arm hit the head. Sometimes it's hard to catch, I could give him that. His angle from the rafters isn't the TV angle. However, also IMO Bilas always wants to look like the smartest guy in the room. And he is loathe to admit he's wrong. So he didn't admit it. True, it was a basketball play. But you still can't hit someone in the head at all these days, both in the public eye and in the rulebook. In this case I think it was more his ego than any effort to avoid an appearance of bias. But yes, SMH over this.
I don't think he's the worst color guy out there (I'll still take him over Alexander), but I don't like him that much.
9F
Well, later in the 2nd half he second guessed Duke getting an out of bounds call for action directly in front of the Auburn bench. There is no way he could see the play from the crow's nest. (Neither could the TV camera.)IMO Bilas at first perhaps didn't see the arm hit the head. Sometimes it's hard to catch, I could give him that. His angle from the rafters isn't the TV angle. However, also IMO Bilas always wants to look like the smartest guy in the room. And he is loathe to admit he's wrong. So he didn't admit it. True, it was a basketball play. But you still can't hit someone in the head at all these days, both in the public eye and in the rulebook. In this case I think it was more his ego than any effort to avoid an appearance of bias. But yes, SMH over this.
I don't think he's the worst color guy out there (I'll still take him over Alexander), but I don't like him that much.
9F
Haven't been on this site in years, just came here today to see if anybody else was as irritated by Bilas as I was, particularly over his doubling and tripling down on the obvious flagrant. I'm so done with that guy. I'd almost rather have an unapologetic Carolina homer like Kenny Smith calling a Duke game than listen to Bilas contort himself endlessly to avoid the appearance of bias.