Just some thoughts I was having on these moons.
Not much information about the eccentricities of the orbits, which will indicate whether these moons are captured (space schmutz) or naturally developing from the accretion disk (and in the ecliptic). I vote for space schmutz.
A back of the envelope calculation suggests that the semi-major axis of the othermost Neptunian moon (27 year revolution) is about 1 billion miles (14 AU), which is also close to the same distance between Neptune and Uranus. The orbit would need to be out of the ecliptic by a lot for Uranus not to greatly perturb this Neptunian moon's orbit if this was not the case.
Further out than Neptune is Pluto (dwarf planet .. sniff sniff
), which has an average distance (875.6 million miles or 9.42 AU) from Neptune that is actually closer to Neptune than is Uranus. But Pluto's orbit is very elliptical, and sometimes is closer to the sun than Neptune. However, its orbit is out of the ecliptic (17 degrees). The closest Neptune and Pluto will ever get is 2.4 AU or 223 Million miles. Neptune's mass is about 1000 times greater than Pluto's.
Science trivia: Uranus and Neptune are the 7th and 8th planets in our solar system. In the periodic table, the element Uranium (U - Atomic Number 92) is followed by Neptunium (NP - Atomic Number 93), this is followed by... Plutonium (Pu - Atomic Number 94).
Larry
DevilHorse