Any Astronomy Buffs Here?

So basically the fastest human-made object would still take a little over nine days to move on a straight line from the sun to the earth. That puts it at around 0.025% of the speed of light or so, if I did the math right.
I'm coming up with 0.064179104%
 
0.0246% C =0.000246 C is what I got.

Larry
DevilHorse

It used repeated gravity assists from Venus to develop an eccentric orbit, approaching within 9.86 solar radii (6.9 million km or 4.3 million miles)[7][8] from the center of the Sun. At its closest approach in 2024, its speed relative to the Sun was 690,000 km/h (430,000 mph) or 191 km/s (118.7 mi/s), which is 0.064% the speed of light.[7][9] It is the fastest object ever built on Earth.[10]
 
Speed of light in MPH = 6.7x 10^8 MPH
Max Speed of Parker Solar Probe = 4.3x 10^5 MPH (according to graphic)
4.3x 10^5 / 6.7x 10^8 = 0.000246 = 0.0246%
No relativistic effects in speed here.

The article and the graphic may differ on what the speed is, but the math is correct. Perhaps an average number is being used somewhere.

Let's not quibble.

Larry
DevilHorse
 
Speed of light in MPH = 6.7x 10^8 MPH
Max Speed of Parker Solar Probe = 4.3x 10^5 MPH (according to graphic)
4.3x 10^5 / 6.7x 10^8 = 0.000246 = 0.0246%
No relativistic effects in speed here.

The article and the graphic may differ on what the speed is, but the math is correct. Perhaps an average number is being used somewhere.

Let's not quibble.

Larry
DevilHorse
My arithmetic is not right. Kdogg's answer is correct. I bow to your superior calculating ability.

Larry
DevilHorse
 
A 3rd non-Solar System object has been spotted and will be passing through the solar system with closest approach toward the end of the year.

The object known as A11pl3Z is taking a very eccentric/hyperbolic trip through the solar system:

For those not familiar with eccentricities and conic sections, here is a little primer:
  • A circular orbit has an eccentricity of 0 # get it, circle... zero, repeatable orbit around the focus
  • An elliptical orbit has an eccentricity between 0 and 1 # repeatable orbit around one of the focii (ellipses have 2 focii)
  • A parabolic orbit has an eccentricity of 1 # non-repeatable orbit. it comes and has enough speed to leave our solar system
  • A hyperbolic orbit has an eccentricity above 1 # moving fast enough to mostly travel in a linear path, with a perturbation at closest approach
A11pl3Z has an eccentricity of 6.

The closest encounter for A11pl3Z with a planet in our solar system will be with Mars at 0.2 AU (about 18 million miles). The object will be 1.2 AU from earth on its' closest approach to us.

Interesting stuff (to me anyway).

Larry
DevilHorse
 
Now here is something interesting that any student of Astronomy can appreciate.
Remember the New Horizons mission; you know the one that took those amazing shots of Pluto during a fly-by. Well it is still doing interesting work.

One of the interesting evolutions in Astronomy has been the desire to measure distances to things. The use of parallax, the telescope's answer to binocular vision, was one of the early ideas to measure distance to nearby stars. Now parallax is being used in other ways.

Larry
DevilHorse
 
Now here is something interesting that any student of Astronomy can appreciate.
Remember the New Horizons mission; you know the one that took those amazing shots of Pluto during a fly-by. Well it is still doing interesting work.

One of the interesting evolutions in Astronomy has been the desire to measure distances to things. The use of parallax, the telescope's answer to binocular vision, was one of the early ideas to measure distance to nearby stars. Now parallax is being used in other ways.

Larry
DevilHorse
New Horizons has demonstrated the use of parallax with two stars.

Is the next step to test "triollax" with, you know, three stars? :unsure:
 
New Horizons has demonstrated the use of parallax with two stars.

Is the next step to test "triollax" with, you know, three stars? :unsure:
That probably wouldn't count as a "next" step. GPS uses three satellites to establish position, plus a fourth to correct timing problems. So maybe "pentolax" would be a next step. :)
 
New Horizons has demonstrated the use of parallax with two stars.

Is the next step to test "triollax" with, you know, three stars? :unsure:
Historically, I think the extension of parallax to 3, would be like having a 3rd eye for depth perception.
1751851563588.png
Somehow I think this is more confusing.

Beware of teachers with eyes behind their heads.

Larry
DevilHorse
 
Great article on how the world's scientists/countries reacted to the discovery of asteroid 2024 YR4:

You remember the asteroid that for a while had a 3% chance of hitting earth in 2032.
With all of the scientists and planning that mobilized, I feel a bit more confidant that all aspects/known_scenarios are being addressed in some way.

Long article (that I haven't finished) but an interesting behind the scenes detail.

Larry
DevilHorse
 
Back
Top