A couple of uncomfortable items to consider: K2's Shooting, Diaz's Status

Status
Not open for further replies.
I will try to elaborate. These are jobs where one is working for a strong institution with good values that include academic excellence. They also have strong communities that support their universities. They are not all about sports. In fact sports, while important, are a bit more in the background.

Yet, they compete in power conferences so play against the best. And there are opportunities for them to win and exceed expectations. Fan expectations are not as high so there is more job security.

Not the best if NCAA championship is your goal. But for a great quality of life, including possibly a winning team, job security, integration into the community, seems like a sweet job.
Yea, there may not be the same sort of pressure that a head football coach might experience at a football powerhouse (Alabama, Ohio St., Texas, Michigan, etc.) BUT even at Duke (and, I assume, also at Vandy, ND, Stanford and a few other academically-oriented universities) if you're the coach of almost any varsity team AND you have too many losing seasons, you have zero job security and will, in fact, most likely be "relieved" of your job (i.e., fired). See, e.g., David Cutcliffe. So, it may be a little less stressful and less pressure to coach at a school like Duke but I have to believe the coaches still feel the expectation to win. The job is not a sinecure.
 
Remember, in the days of NIL, we are all supposed to focus only on the market value of people and the money they can make. That was the entire thesis behind NIL.
I reject that characterization. The thesis behind NIL, in my opinion, was that the schools were treating this as a money making endeavor, and as a professional sport. In that situation, it’s not right (and from an antitrust point of view, illegal) to not extend that same consideration to the players.

Of course, there are a great many undesirable side effects that result from NIL. That we are only seeing those side effects now, 40+ years after football was taken away from the NCAA by the schools so they could maximize their profits, is the biggest surprise to me.
 
I disagree, because the moniker of "coach who can coach anywhere" also implies a coach who is willing to coach anywhere.
Actually that's kind of the opposite of what that means. A coach who can coach anywhere - in the context I was using - is a coach who can have the pick of jobs anywhere. Kind of NOT AT ALL "willing" to coach anywhere.
 
BUT even at Duke (and, I assume, also at Vandy, ND, Stanford and a few other academically-oriented universities) if you're the coach of almost any varsity team AND you have too many losing seasons, you have zero job security and will, in fact, most likely be "relieved" of your job (i.e., fired). See, e.g., David Cutcliffe. So, it may be a little less stressful and less pressure to coach at a school like Duke but I have to believe the coaches still feel the expectation to win. The job is not a sinecure.
Very true. Elko was the first coach we’ve had since Spurrier who wasn’t fired (Cutcliffe essentially was).
 
Actually that's kind of the opposite of what that means. A coach who can coach anywhere - in the context I was using - is a coach who can have the pick of jobs anywhere. Kind of NOT AT ALL "willing" to coach anywhere.
In order for a coach to be the kind of coach who "can coach anywhere", one of two things has to happen: 1. Said coach needs to be somewhere for a very long time, winning games; or, 2. said coach needs to make jumps from place to place as a winning coach. The first one may well happen at Duke, but we can't tell that in our coach's first year in the program. All we can say with respect to Duke is that it apparently was Coach Cutcliffe's dream job, and it apparently wasn't Midnight Mike's dream job. The second one is exactly what I said, which is a coach who is willing to coach anywhere.
 
I reject that characterization. The thesis behind NIL, in my opinion, was that the schools were treating this as a money making endeavor, and as a professional sport. In that situation, it’s not right (and from an antitrust point of view, illegal) to not extend that same consideration to the players.

Of course, there are a great many undesirable side effects that result from NIL. That we are only seeing those side effects now, 40+ years after football was taken away from the NCAA by the schools so they could maximize their profits, is the biggest surprise to me.
Well full disclosure, I do agree that your assessment is somewhat true, and I worded my take brutally on purpose to make a point....but your characterization and mine are not mutually exclusive by any means. The side effects we are seeing now were and are so predictable - and many are not good at all.
 
Just read somewhere today about the abuse Ryan Day and his family, he has young children, are taking in Columbus Ohio. The writer opined that Day might just walk away. Kirk Herbstriet moved from Columbus several years ago to Nashville for the same reason and he is just an announcer. Quite sure David Cutcliffe never experienced that in Durham. Being able to win and not go through that kind of pressure may appeal to some guys. Hopefully Manny is one of those.
 
Just read somewhere today about the abuse Ryan Day and his family, he has young children, are taking in Columbus Ohio. The writer opined that Day might just walk away. Kirk Herbstriet moved from Columbus several years ago to Nashville for the same reason and he is just an announcer. Quite sure David Cutcliffe never experienced that in Durham. Being able to win and not go through that kind of pressure may appeal to some guys. Hopefully Manny is one of those.
Ran into an old friend Saturday night who is an OSU fan but not a nut. He was sure Day was going to be fired because he was 1-4 against UM. His overall record: 66-10 (46-5). This is his 6th year as head coach and he has never finished outside the top-10 and probably won't this year.

Who would even want to win for those fans?
 
Ran into an old friend Saturday night who is an OSU fan but not a nut. He was sure Day was going to be fired because he was 1-4 against UM. His overall record: 66-10 (46-5). This is his 6th year as head coach and he has never finished outside the top-10 and probably won't this year.

Who would even want to win for those fans?
I see what you did there...even though you may have not meant to. ;)
 
Perhaps the goal (of fans, univ brass) is to win championships, not just post a high winning % record.
And to beat one's rival at least half the time.
Good luck. That is why many fans are miserable, only 1 team has happy fans at the end of the season. Dean Wormer would like to paraphrase his own advice.
 
Weird, that song was one of the answers at my local pub's trivia night tonight. Hadn't thought of it in ages and now...twice in a couple hours!
 
Ran into an old friend Saturday night who is an OSU fan but not a nut. He was sure Day was going to be fired because he was 1-4 against UM. His overall record: 66-10 (46-5). This is his 6th year as head coach and he has never finished outside the top-10 and probably won't this year.

Who would even want to win for those fans?
My brother was calling for him to be fired at halftime, so this hits close to home. I kind of get it, too...

Ryan Day in games after Thanksgiving:

W
W
L

W
L

L
W

L
L

L
L

L

1-7 is not a good look.
 
So jnder
My brother was calling for him to be fired at halftime, so this hits close to home. I kind of get it, too...

Ryan Day in games after Thanksgiving:

W
W
L

W
L

L
W

L
L

L
L

L

1-7 is not a good look.
So under this reasoning we should have fired K after he lost his first four final fours or when he lost a lot to UNc a lot in the early years. I am a huge Duke fan. I hate when we lose. But if you can’t find some joy from all the wins, playing in the big games, etc, you need to seek help. And threatening a coach or his family or young children is actually criminal. Since great coaches have big egos, someone else would probably seek the job, but anyone with a good secure job would be crazy to.
 
on the flip side, our last three coaches have had major successes in the first year. obviously the data support firing the coach every year. we'd be in the playoffs for usre.
David Cutcliffe equaled the win total of the four previous years combined in his first year, but only at 1990s-2000's Duke would we call 4-8 a major success.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top