AlaskanAssassin
Member
There will be an adjustment period for Khaman, but don’t think it’ll be as long as some may think with his experience playing in the Basketball Africa League against grown men and will continue to do so in the Olympics.
I also think we’re too quick to assume who Duke’s 5 best players are. Would anyone be surprised if James, Evans or Kon ended up being better college players than Maliach next year? I think the beauty of this roster is that it can flex up and down and Flagg is at the center of that.
All that being said, I have to side with Jason (I think) from the pod, in expecting a lot of Flagg at the 4 next year because otherwise I think shooting and spacing will be a bit of a problem on offense. And I actually don’t think that’s out of position but rather will optimize his skill set in college. But what do I know? I didn’t even sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
I would say, "Would anyone be surprised if James, Evans or Kon ended up being better college players than Brown next year?" Having seen Maluach perform against grown men in the BAL (grown men who played P5 D1 baketball, I might add) I just struggle to see a scenario where he is not a quite significant player for Duke.
To me, the uncertainty largely surrounds Brown. He was a very low-usage player on offense who really was asked to finish inside of 5 feet and not do much more than that. Having him on the floor with Maluach could be crowded some of the time. Everyone seems all gaga over his D but I wonder if folks are conflating All-ACC Defensive team with making an All-ACC Team. And let's note that almost half the folks who vote on the All-Defensive team did not even put Brown's name on their ballot so it is not like he was some overwhelmingly obvious elite defender.
I don't want to be seen as dumping on the kid. I love that we got Maliq and think he will be very valuable... but as we search for "Duke's best 5" players and we look at some really intriguing wing options who seem like they may get squeezed out, I think it is worth considering that maybe one of them will excel in a way that leaves a guy who attempted 30% fewer shots than Mark Mitchell out of the 30+ minute per game mix.
And if Brown is more like a 20-ish minute per game guy then I think we may see Flagg playing 15+mpg at the 4.
It's possible Jon does decide to split Cooper's minutes between the 3/4 and start all three of Flagg/Brown/Maluach.
But if he does, the only way they are on the court together for many minutes is if Ngongba is playing 10-15mpg backing up the 5. And if he does, these minutes are coming directly from K2 and Evans - there just aren't enough minutes to go around.
I've laid out all the reasons why I think this is unlikely. And it has nothing to do with Brown's talent or minutes. He can play just as many minutes per game as the primary backup at the 5/4 as he would as the starter at the 4. It would mean Ngongba only plays garbage minutes while one or both of K2/Evans are in the rotation.
Sky, I agree with you more than I don't, but by no means is that the only way that can happen. I've outlined this scenario before here and also on the pod:
Tyrese, Caleb, Flagg, Brown, Maluach start. For ~15 mpg, Maluach sits and Brown shifts down to the 5. Let's say for ~10 of those minutes Cooper shifts down to the 4, and one of Sion, Mason, or the freshmen come in at the 3. For the other 5 minutes, Mason Gillis is more than capable of playing the 4... he did so extensively at Purdue. That leaves 25 more minutes to distribute at the 4: as the starter, I'd imagine Maliq gets at least 15 of those. That leaves another ~10 minutes at the 4, which I think it's again fair to assume around 5 would be taken by Cooper and around 5 by Mason.
That's ~25 mpg for Maluach, ~30 for Maliq, and ~30-35 for Cooper (since it'll be more straightforward to find him another 5 mpg of rest from his time at the 4). That's predicting Cooper to play ~15 mpg at the 3 and ~15 mpg at the 4. That's very reasonable.
Again, is this necessarily going to happen? Of course not. Would the rotation be easier and more robust if we could rely on Pat for 5-10 mpg? Of course. But it's logically flawed to say that 15+ mpg for Pat is the only way this happens. I just outlined a very plausible path in which it doesn't.
Quick addendum: I don't think that Cooper can't play the 4 at Duke. In fact, I was one of those expecting him to before the roster started coming into focus. And I think he will probably split his time between the 3 and the 4. But I really think it's important to recognize that Cooper starting at the 3 doesn't necessitate the huge reliance on Pat that you've been implying. Maybe it makes it easier, but it isn't a necessity.
I think two things are in tension here.
First, it doesn't make sense for Ngongba to play 0 minutes. Even for a big, you'd expect someone with his ranking to play at least 8 minutes a game, possibly significantly more. I think we all assume that any time Ngongba gets will have to be in place of Maluach. His selection to the US team tells us he is healthy and playing well again.
Second, we have 10 players that you would expect to get significant playing time, but Duke simply doesn't go that deep.
I'm very curious to see how this evolves.
You want to keep it simple and build the offense around Cooper.
Scott, you are right that Jon could piece together the minutes like this without Ngongba time, but you glossed over my first point that if he does, Flagg/Brown/Maluach won't be on the court together for many minutes anyway. You'll be quicker at doing the math on how many minutes that is in your scenario...
So what's the pro of this approach? I guess you get to tell Brown he's a starter even though he's not playing any more minutes. And you do have a potentially fearsome D for the few minutes that Flagg/Brown/Maluach are on the court together though I think you're neutering Flagg's greatest strength if you have him chasing wings on the perimeter.
I think there are a lot of cons to this approach that I've outlined, but I'll mention one again. Jon has very limited time to install offensive sets and plays and get the team to gel. To take your generational talent and split his brain so that for 15 min per game he is doing this at the 3 and for 15 min per game he is doing this at the 4 doesn't make a lot of sense. You want to keep it simple and build the offense around Cooper.
Proctor at the 1, Cooper at the 4, Maluach at the 5. Let your stars master their positions on offense and learn to play off each other. Let Foster (2/1) and Brown (5/4) be the only two guys regularly asked to play multiple roles in our offensive sets.
I believe Brown, James and Gillis are all playing rotation minutes - 15-25 mpg. I haven't heard anybody speculate otherwise.
IF Jon does go with an 8-man rotation, that means only one of K2 Evans or Ngongba is in the rotation. Based on rankings, health and roster construction, I think it's highly likely either Evans or K2 will be our 8th man - or 6th or 7th man if he explodes on the scene like McCain...
My understanding is that Cooper's D is what truly makes him generational, much more than his offense. And while he's an incredible shot blocker, he's maybe even better in space - kind of like UNC Battier, run around and make things happen. My point, I guess, is that I see the shape of the D maybe having a larger effect of minutes than the offense. And I can totally see Cooper logging major minutes at the 3 against bigger teams or teams we don't have to switch as much.
I don't agree. The Duke recruits will get ample opportunity to show they belong and do or do not project as starters. Otherwise, they are history. So, I think you're a bit off in arguing Brown, James ABD Gillis will play +/- 20 mins. Certainly one and maybe two.
"Duke doesn't play a 9-10 person rotation." Boy, it's a new world with 80 % turnover every year. I believe the freshmen will get significant chances to play. Yes, it's hard to plan sets with so many players. Everything's hard. K and Roy and Boeheim retired -- yep -- who signed up for this madness? No one!
Yes!!! Battier is probably THE best Duke comp for Cooper. Battier played the 4.
Somebody tell me the last Duke superstar who split minutes between positions. Has it ever happened? You don't make Cooper adapt to the personnel. You make the personnel adapt to Cooper. Just my opinion.
Brown is definitely one of our best 5 players. And I feel like there's a camp of "start your best 5". I'm in the camp of "play your best 5 the most minutes". You don't have to start Brown to make that happen.
The pro of the approach is simple: you get your most talented players the most possible minutes. Unless one of our freshman not named Cooper or Khaman absolutely blows past our expectations, I think the most likely scenario (again, as of May 29) is that Brown is one of our Top 5 players... again, he was one of the Top 5 defensive players in the entire ACC last year.
I also think you're overvaluing the benefits of Cooper playing exclusively at one position. I don't think there will practically be much difference in how he plays whether he's at the 3 or at the 4. That isn't much a distinction in the modern game to begin with, and I think Cooper is talented enough that the team will revolve around him, rather than him having to adjust to what position he's at and who is on the court with him.
Finally, as far as minutes played together, I think what's most important is that the best group is playing at the beginning and end of games. In the scenario I outlined, it's very likely our best group could play around the first 8 and last 8 minutes together. That's more than fine for a starting 5 on a team that had as much versatility as ours, I think.
Lessee..
Heyman used to bring the ball up.
Grant could play four positions -- and seemed to.
Singler's jersey wasn't retired, but maybe it should be. He played C as a freshman.
If Justise had stayed, he would have played multiple positions.
What about Spanarkel?