Name, Image, Likeness

I don't usually agree with Jenkins, but I sure do on this one, on the problems with college athletics: it's the schools, not the athletes.

Gift link: https://wapo.st/3X8we0a

b9e7f7d775bd341f9ee6498b47da2bc4.gif
 
I don't usually agree with Jenkins, but I sure do on this one, on the problems with college athletics: it's the schools, not the athletes.

Gift link: https://wapo.st/3X8we0a

“But what needs regulating is the conduct of the schools, not the kids.”

That’s the most succinct explanation of why the NCAA cannot fix this. The schools that have power (SEC, B1G) do not want to be regulated.
 
“But what needs regulating is the conduct of the schools, not the kids.”

That’s the most succinct explanation of why the NCAA cannot fix this. The schools that have power (SEC, B1G) do not want to be regulated.

Yep and this the huge schism between the existing powers and the powers-in-waiting. Which side we fall on TBD.
 

I disagree. There’s nothing offered more than platitudes in the article. It’s as vapid as Marjorie Taylor Green stating “we don’t have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem.”

I commented on the worthlessness of opinion journalism in the presidential election thread and this “perspective” is a perfect example.

What’s to be done about it now that we know who to blame? Revert to intramural sports only? Pay the the athletes their “market value”? I guess someone else can make the sausage now that we’ve established the moral high ground.
 
https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profo...-taxes-are-the-next-wave-of-nil-complications
"As one source with knowledge of the dynamics of the NIL marketplace recently explained it to PFT, unpaid taxes will be the next big problem for name, image, and likeness payments. Plenty of kids are getting their money and spending it — without paying taxes on it or otherwise setting aside the money to do so."

The writer doesn't understand how taxes are calculated.

The tax rates vary from state to state. The federal laws are universal and undeniable. For $1 million, the current federal rate is 37 percent. Which means that, if the payment is made this year, $370,000 will need to be paid to the federal government by April 15, 2025.
1) It would be 33% max.
2) They would be do in the quarter received as estimated taxes not at the end of the tax year to avoid a penalty.

and

Taxes aren’t withheld from these payments, like they are when players get paid by their NFL teams. For NIL payments, young men who in most cases have never paid taxes and in many cases don’t know much if anything about the process will have to figure it out.

Any legitimate business will withhold, report and remit 25% on large payments made to the athlete if it's 1099 income. It's backup withholding. It's not required but it's just good business practice for large sums.
 
The writer doesn't understand how taxes are calculated.


1) It would be 33% max.
2) They would be do in the quarter received as estimated taxes not at the end of the tax year to avoid a penalty.

and



Any legitimate business will withhold, report and remit 25% on large payments made to the athlete if it's 1099 income. It's backup withholding. It's not required but it's just good business practice for large sums.

IMHO (H stands for "hubris"), one job Rachel Baker can certainly do is bug the players about taxes and accountants (or agents).
 
The writer doesn't understand how taxes are calculated.


1) It would be 33% max.
2) They would be do in the quarter received as estimated taxes not at the end of the tax year to avoid a penalty.

and



Any legitimate business will withhold, report and remit 25% on large payments made to the athlete if it's 1099 income. It's backup withholding. It's not required but it's just good business practice for large sums.

Yup, they're clearly not a tax accountant and doesn't understand marginal tax rates, but seems certainly plausible that their source knows what they're talking about as it relates to certain athletes not paying attention to tax implications. I'd think ANY player represented by an agent (Read: all top players) would not have this issue though...pretty basic that you must pay taxes on income. Who doesn't know that?? But when it's the "first time" for someone who is 18, it's possible that they just don't think about it unless told by others, I guess....I agree that programs likely are reminding players of this fact too, and someone like Baker is in the exact role to do so (Even if they're not the ones themselves helping for the estimated quarterly payments and filing taxes at the end of the year).
 
Yup, they're clearly not a tax accountant and doesn't understand marginal tax rates, but seems certainly plausible that their source knows what they're talking about as it relates to certain athletes not paying attention to tax implications. I'd think ANY player represented by an agent (Read: all top players) would not have this issue though...pretty basic that you must pay taxes on income. Who doesn't know that?? But when it's the "first time" for someone who is 18, it's possible that they just don't think about it unless told by others, I guess...I agree that programs likely are reminding players of this fact too, and someone like Baker is in the exact role to do so (Even if they're not the ones themselves helping for the estimated quarterly payments and filing taxes at the end of the year).

From my years ago experience as a parent of 18-yr olds, I suspect many of the smaller fish will blow through the money and think they’ll catch up on the tax part later.🤬
 
I am fairly sure more power-conference programs (as well as Gonzaga, Memphis, and other significant NIL players not in major conferences) has someone (like a Rachel Baker) who provides information and instruction to players about the financial impact of NIL programs. What's more, most of these players have agents and/or managers who would also be inclined to explain the financial reality to these kids.

The article makes it sound like someone is just handing a million dollar check to an 18 year old and there is no one else involved in the process. Sorry, but there are a number of more experienced business people involved in all of this. A program (or an agent) that allowed its players to be shocked by unexpected tax bills would be a program/agent that would not get good players moving forward.

(( edit- bluedog said almost the exact same thing... oops! ))
 
Last edited:
I am fairly sure more power-conference programs (as well as Gonzaga, Memphis, and other significant NIL players not in major conferences) has someone (like a Rachel Baker) who provides information and instruction to players about the financial impact of NIL programs. What's more, most of these players have agents and/or managers who would also be inclined to explain the financial reality to these kids.

The article makes it sound like someone is just handing a million dollar check to an 18 year old and there is no one else involved in the process. Sorry, but there are a number of more experienced business people involved in all of this. A program (or an agent) that allowed its players to be shocked by unexpected tax bills would be a program/agent that would not get good players moving forward.

And then there are certain unsophisticated parents, with little knowledge of tax law, who see all that money rolling in ....
 
And then there are certain unsophisticated parents, with little knowledge of tax law, who see all that money rolling in ...

Agreed, though parents are the least of it. Long lost relatives, 2nd grade classmates, AAU coaches, etc. And now I'm guessing many of these players are signing with advisors long before they have set foot on a college campus. I bet it is a free-for-all with sketchy agents hanging out at 14 year old AAU games. And many of these HS players are bouncing from HS to HS without anyone really looking out for them. They have no idea who to trust.

And remember, Zion went to Duke and had all of the resources of Duke available to him. Yet even after that, he chose to associate with some pretty sketchy characters. And I don't think he is the only Duke basketball player to do so.

A lot of people are going to get burned really badly. Historically the NCAA was pretty useless but at least it tried. Now it is truly the wild west.
 
Agreed, though parents are the least of it. Long lost relatives, 2nd grade classmates, AAU coaches, etc. And now I'm guessing many of these players are signing with advisors long before they have set foot on a college campus. I bet it is a free-for-all with sketchy agents hanging out at 14 year old AAU games. And many of these HS players are bouncing from HS to HS without anyone really looking out for them. They have no idea who to trust.

And remember, Zion went to Duke and had all of the resources of Duke available to him. Yet even after that, he chose to associate with some pretty sketchy characters. And I don't think he is the only Duke basketball player to do so.

A lot of people are going to get burned really badly. Historically the NCAA was pretty useless but at least it tried. Now it is truly the wild west.

Surely I'm a 2nd grade classmate to someone I can "refriend." :cool:

Excuse me, I have to go find my yearbook from 1957.
 
Surely I'm a 2nd grade classmate to someone I can "refriend." :cool:

Excuse me, I have to go find my yearbook from 1957.

I actually had a babysitter around the 2nd grade who went onto a fairly long NBA career. So I should go look him up - have not had any contact with him in about 40 years.
 
I disagree. There’s nothing offered more than platitudes in the article.

What’s to be done about it now that we know who to blame? Revert to intramural sports only? Pay the the athletes their “market value”? I guess someone else can make the sausage now that we’ve established the moral high ground.

Gonna have to agree with you on this one. Related...the emotional inertia to always side with / excuse / coddle "the players" in all of these situations. I don't suffer from that malady. Almost 100% of journos do. Or pretend to.

For what?

Gonna go out on a limb here and posit that this was a joke....
 
Back
Top