2025 Men's Basketball Recruiting

It's getting down to only recruiting a few high school players, then filling out your roster with transfers. An 8-9 player roster seems in the future. Yikes !

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-b...ipari-hints-limiting-arkansas-roster-8-9-guys

"You may think I'm crazy, but I told my staff I only want to have eight or nine guys," Calipari told Robinson, who is now executive director of the National Association of Basketball Coaches. "They're leaving anyway, and why would I develop a kid for someone else? Why would I do that?"

Cal says he wants grad assistants who play in Europe or who just finished their playing careers. Essentially, his assistants will be his scout team. It is a really interesting idea. Not sure it works with just 8 players as one injury and then foul trouble can put your team in real peril, but I can see 9 working and 10 is entirely reasonable in this day and age.
 
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-b...ipari-hints-limiting-arkansas-roster-8-9-guys

Cal says he wants grad assistants who play in Europe or who just finished their playing careers. Essentially, his assistants will be his scout team. It is a really interesting idea. Not sure it works with just 8 players as one injury and then foul trouble can put your team in real peril, but I can see 9 working and 10 is entirely reasonable in this day and age.

It is an interesting idea, but a super cynical one that has a high likelihood for disaster. Here's the money quote:

"They're leaving anyway, and why would I develop a kid for someone else? Why would I do that?"

That's 100% valid. But there's always some change one of those deeper bench guys will explode into an instant impact contributor (under this philosophy Reed Shepard probably never ends up in Lexington), as opposed to grad assistants who literally cannot play in games. And as mentioned, injuries and foul trouble are a variable you sometimes can't control.

Even if you operate under the assumption that guys 9-11 on your bench are highly likely to be in another uniform after one season, the insurance they provide for the one year you anticipate them being on campus is probably worth the cost. And let's be honest, how much time and effort is Jon Calipari actually spending on those deep bench guys anyways? If it's an issue of NIL, then sure, maybe you put all your dollars into 8 guys. But if it's an issue of not wanting to put the coaching effort in, that's just pure laziness on his part.

Put another way, if something horrible were to happen this year and Duke has to rely on Pat Ngongba or Darren Harris for significant minutes, the season isn't a complete lost cause. If something horrible were to happen with only 8 or 9 playable guys, it's a disaster.
 
It is an interesting idea, but a super cynical one that has a high likelihood for disaster.

In addition, with only 8-9 roster players they are not able to have 5-on-5 practices or scrimages unless they bring in outside players. The quality of the practice sessions will be limited. Unless they are all Allen Iversons.
 
Cal says he wants grad assistants who play in Europe or who just finished their playing careers. Essentially, his assistants will be his scout team. It is a really interesting idea. Not sure it works with just 8 players as one injury and then foul trouble can put your team in real peril, but I can see 9 working and 10 is entirely reasonable in this day and age.

We saw in 2015 that 8 is enough! Provided those 8 are all super talented and fit together perfectly and don't get hurt.

You can win with just 8 guys in March, but I wouldn't want to enter the season with just 8 guys who could contribute.
 
We saw in 2015 that 8 is enough! Provided those 8 are all super talented and fit together perfectly and don't get hurt.

You can win with just 8 guys in March, but I wouldn't want to enter the season with just 8 guys who could contribute.

Duke began that season with 10 scholarship players.
 
It is an interesting idea, but a super cynical one that has a high likelihood for disaster. Here's the money quote:



That's 100% valid. But there's always some change one of those deeper bench guys will explode into an instant impact contributor (under this philosophy Reed Shepard probably never ends up in Lexington), as opposed to grad assistants who literally cannot play in games. And as mentioned, injuries and foul trouble are a variable you sometimes can't control.

Even if you operate under the assumption that guys 9-11 on your bench are highly likely to be in another uniform after one season, the insurance they provide for the one year you anticipate them being on campus is probably worth the cost. And let's be honest, how much time and effort is Jon Calipari actually spending on those deep bench guys anyways? If it's an issue of NIL, then sure, maybe you put all your dollars into 8 guys. But if it's an issue of not wanting to put the coaching effort in, that's just pure laziness on his part.

Put another way, if something horrible were to happen this year and Duke has to rely on Pat Ngongba or Darren Harris for significant minutes, the season isn't a complete lost cause. If something horrible were to happen with only 8 or 9 playable guys, it's a disaster.

Agree with all this. My experience in life with salesmen like Cal is they enjoy saying outrageous things sometimes that they may not fully believe. I think this is one of those cases. He's got 8 guys on his roster now and he's still targeting portal guys, so the actions really don't match the words.

But he's right that the need to carry a deeper bench of developmental players has gone away...
 
Recruiting Reset

It is harder and harder to figure out rosters, recruiting, and everything in the current environment for college basketball. The roster for the 2024-25 season appears mostly set. The staff seems to have turned their attention to the Class of 2025 based on the recent offer to top HS prospect AJ Dybantsa. I thought this would be a good time to try to wrap my head around recruiting for the Class of 2025. Let's start with what might happen to the current roster next April:

The Current Roster
Definitely gone: Cooper Flagg, Mason Gillis, Sion James, and Khaman Maluach
Probably gone: Tyrese Proctor
No clue what will happen: Maliq Brown and Caleb Foster
Maybe returning: Isaiah Evans, Darren Harris, Kon Knueppel, and Patrick Ngongba

The top freshmen listed in the definitely gone group should elicit little debate. They are going to get drafted in the 2025 NBA Draft. James and Gillis will exhaust their eligibility and one or both might also try to get drafted as a 3-and-D or role player.

Tyrese Proctor is an interesting case. He is only 3 1/2 months older than Caleb Foster and will be entering his 3rd year as a starter. His career has been a little up and down. This reminds me of another younger player that had an uneven first two years before becoming a 1st round NBA Draft pick, Wendell Moore, Jr. Hopefully Proctor ends his college career in the Final Four (or, better yet, the National Title Game) like Moore did. If he has a solid draft position this time next year, he'll be gone. You could say the same about Caleb Foster, I suppose. My one question for him is about his role on the team. Proctor will probably be the primary ball handler next year with Foster serving as a the starting scoring guard and backup primary guard. Foster could show that his 40% 3-point shooting from his freshman season is no fluke and add a more well-rounded and consistent scoring display to move into the 2025 Draft. However, he is not the most explosively athletic guard and seems to lack an elite skill outside of the jump shot. In an ideal world, it would do him well to slide over to the primary PG role as a junior to show that he can run a team. But we don't live in an ideal world anymore. It's impossible to predict how this will all play out.

Maliq Brown is another interesting case. He has two years remaining, same as Proctor. In an ideal world, he would stay for two years or however long it takes for him to show that he can shoot the ball to go along with the rest of his game. There are a ton of players that are "a jump shot away from the NBA." Harrison Ingram was one of those players last year. It does happen. Maybe that happens for Brown? Maybe not. Either way, he's a valuable and versatile player that would be welcome at Duke as long as he wants to be there.

That leaves us with the other incoming freshmen. There are three wings that can all shoot the ball between Evans, Knueppel, and Harris. The other is big man Ngongba (who maybe can also shoot?). Of that group, Ngongba might be the most likely to stay as he has a history of injury in high school and would be the presumptive starting C on the team in 2025-26. One or two of the wings could also slide into starting roles as sophomores. Evans is the highest-rated of this group. He seems to lack the size and strength that he will need to compete in college, let alone the NBA. Then again, "Baby Ingram's" namesake was also slight of build but possessed a wiry strength. Knieppel lacks the footspeed and also needs to work on his body to get to the point of being a legit NBA prospect. Harris might be the best shooter amongst the group but lacks elite athleticism. I've also rarely seen him handle the ball long enough to show that he can operate with the ball in his hands. Who knows what the freshmen fours' defense will look like. In that ideal world I keep mentioning, all 4 would be sophomores at Duke. In the real world, how likely will that be?

High School Prospects
Hardly anyone in the Class of 2025 has committed yet. The Duke coaching staff made several offers in 2024 before shutting things down (I'll note that this is from my outside perspective) during the season. They have recently made an offer to top prospect AJ Dybantsa and will most likely refine their list of targets during the summer and fall of 2025. I feel confident that the coaching staff is continuing to prioritize a couple of players. After that, it gets murky. I'll try to group these players into two tiers based on my own view.

The primary targets:
AJ Dybantsa, 6'8" SF (unanimous #1 player in the class by 247, ESPN, On3, and Rivals)
Cameron Boozer, 6'9" PF (unanimous #2)
Cayden Boozer, 6'3" G (consensus #16)

Other offers:
Caleb Wilson, 6'9" PF (consensus #4)
Koa Peat, 6'8" PF (unanimous #5)
Meleek Thomas, 6'3" G (consensus #6)
Jalen Haralson, 6'6" SF (consensus #11)
Brayden Burries, 6'4" G (consensus #14)
Nate Ament, 6'9" SF (consensus #16)

It's hard for me to see any broad trends here. Duke could be looking for two starting guards for the 2025-26 season if both Proctor and Foster leave. Yet, they have only offered Cayden Boozer, Thomas, and Burries thus far. None of those three strike me as lead guards. They are a lot like the guards that Scheyer and staff have been recruiting, capable of being on or off the ball. Perhaps they expect Foster to be the starting PG with Boozer and/or Thomas there to be off the ball. Or maybe they think Isaiah Evans will be more of a guard than a wing in college. Or they could look to the portal to fill out a hole that becomes apparent next spring. I think the safest bet is that the coaching staff will go as hard as they can after the primary targets and then figure things out after that. If they land Dybansta and the Boozer twins, that might force out Maliq Brown and at least one of the Class of 2024 wings. If you can land those players, I think you do it.

The main thing I see is a cloudy forecast. There will almost certainly be more offers coming soon and then scheduled visits. That will tip the hand of the direction that recruiting for the Class of 2025 will go.
 
Duke could be looking for two starting guards for the 2025-26 season if both Proctor and Foster leave. Yet, they have only offered Cayden Boozer, Thomas, and Burries thus far. None of those three strike me as lead guards.

Could be possible Coach Scheyer wants to bring in an experienced lead guard from the portal, and groom a freshman PG for a year before handing him the reins. I certainly would not feel comfortable going into a postseason with a freshman running the show short of a Tyus Jones level playmaker, and even he was pretty shaky until late into the season.

In my opinion, it's more viable to have your OAD freshmen be wings and/or bigs, but have experienced guards either from the portal or guys like Tyrese Proctor, Jeremy Roach, Quinn Cook, etc, who have stayed at Duke a few years.

Duke hasn't yet recruited a starting PG from the portal, but UConn just won 2 championships doing that. I could see Jon Scheyer doing it for sure.
 
Last edited:
It is harder and harder to figure out rosters, recruiting, and everything in the current environment for college basketball. The roster for the 2024-25 season appears mostly set. The staff seems to have turned their attention to the Class of 2025 based on the recent offer to top HS prospect AJ Dybantsa. I thought this would be a good time to try to wrap my head around recruiting for the Class of 2025. Let's start with what might happen to the current roster next April:

The Current Roster
Definitely gone: Cooper Flagg, Mason Gillis, Sion James, and Khaman Maluach
Probably gone: Tyrese Proctor
No clue what will happen: Maliq Brown and Caleb Foster
Maybe returning: Isaiah Evans, Darren Harris, Kon Knueppel, and Patrick Ngongba

The top freshmen listed in the definitely gone group should elicit little debate. They are going to get drafted in the 2025 NBA Draft. James and Gillis will exhaust their eligibility and one or both might also try to get drafted as a 3-and-D or role player.

Tyrese Proctor is an interesting case. He is only 3 1/2 months older than Caleb Foster and will be entering his 3rd year as a starter. His career has been a little up and down. This reminds me of another younger player that had an uneven first two years before becoming a 1st round NBA Draft pick, Wendell Moore, Jr. Hopefully Proctor ends his college career in the Final Four (or, better yet, the National Title Game) like Moore did. If he has a solid draft position this time next year, he'll be gone. You could say the same about Caleb Foster, I suppose. My one question for him is about his role on the team. Proctor will probably be the primary ball handler next year with Foster serving as a the starting scoring guard and backup primary guard. Foster could show that his 40% 3-point shooting from his freshman season is no fluke and add a more well-rounded and consistent scoring display to move into the 2025 Draft. However, he is not the most explosively athletic guard and seems to lack an elite skill outside of the jump shot. In an ideal world, it would do him well to slide over to the primary PG role as a junior to show that he can run a team. But we don't live in an ideal world anymore. It's impossible to predict how this will all play out.

Maliq Brown is another interesting case. He has two years remaining, same as Proctor. In an ideal world, he would stay for two years or however long it takes for him to show that he can shoot the ball to go along with the rest of his game. There are a ton of players that are "a jump shot away from the NBA." Harrison Ingram was one of those players last year. It does happen. Maybe that happens for Brown? Maybe not. Either way, he's a valuable and versatile player that would be welcome at Duke as long as he wants to be there.

That leaves us with the other incoming freshmen. There are three wings that can all shoot the ball between Evans, Knueppel, and Harris. The other is big man Ngongba (who maybe can also shoot?). Of that group, Ngongba might be the most likely to stay as he has a history of injury in high school and would be the presumptive starting C on the team in 2025-26. One or two of the wings could also slide into starting roles as sophomores. Evans is the highest-rated of this group. He seems to lack the size and strength that he will need to compete in college, let alone the NBA. Then again, "Baby Ingram's" namesake was also slight of build but possessed a wiry strength. Knieppel lacks the footspeed and also needs to work on his body to get to the point of being a legit NBA prospect. Harris might be the best shooter amongst the group but lacks elite athleticism. I've also rarely seen him handle the ball long enough to show that he can operate with the ball in his hands. Who knows what the freshmen fours' defense will look like. In that ideal world I keep mentioning, all 4 would be sophomores at Duke. In the real world, how likely will that be?

High School Prospects
Hardly anyone in the Class of 2025 has committed yet. The Duke coaching staff made several offers in 2024 before shutting things down (I'll note that this is from my outside perspective) during the season. They have recently made an offer to top prospect AJ Dybantsa and will most likely refine their list of targets during the summer and fall of 2025. I feel confident that the coaching staff is continuing to prioritize a couple of players. After that, it gets murky. I'll try to group these players into two tiers based on my own view.

The primary targets:
AJ Dybantsa, 6'8" SF (unanimous #1 player in the class by 247, ESPN, On3, and Rivals)
Cameron Boozer, 6'9" PF (unanimous #2)
Cayden Boozer, 6'3" G (consensus #16)

Other offers:
Caleb Wilson, 6'9" PF (consensus #4)
Koa Peat, 6'8" PF (unanimous #5)
Meleek Thomas, 6'3" G (consensus #6)
Jalen Haralson, 6'6" SF (consensus #11)
Brayden Burries, 6'4" G (consensus #14)
Nate Ament, 6'9" SF (consensus #16)

It's hard for me to see any broad trends here. Duke could be looking for two starting guards for the 2025-26 season if both Proctor and Foster leave. Yet, they have only offered Cayden Boozer, Thomas, and Burries thus far. None of those three strike me as lead guards. They are a lot like the guards that Scheyer and staff have been recruiting, capable of being on or off the ball. Perhaps they expect Foster to be the starting PG with Boozer and/or Thomas there to be off the ball. Or maybe they think Isaiah Evans will be more of a guard than a wing in college. Or they could look to the portal to fill out a hole that becomes apparent next spring. I think the safest bet is that the coaching staff will go as hard as they can after the primary targets and then figure things out after that. If they land Dybansta and the Boozer twins, that might force out Maliq Brown and at least one of the Class of 2024 wings. If you can land those players, I think you do it.

The main thing I see is a cloudy forecast. There will almost certainly be more offers coming soon and then scheduled visits. That will tip the hand of the direction that recruiting for the Class of 2025 will go.

Solid appraisal. Thx.

I wouldn't say I see any broad trends here either, but what I do see is Duke continuing to go after the most elite HS prospects in the nation, and I can only assume that a lot of them see themselves as OADs. I don't see any kind of emphasis on that 15-30 range that has been discussed here at length, at least not yet.
 
I wouldn't say I see any broad trends here either, but what I do see is Duke continuing to go after the most elite HS prospects in the nation, and I can only assume that a lot of them see themselves as OADs. I don't see any kind of emphasis on that 15-30 range that has been discussed here at length, at least not yet.

I have no inside knowledge but I would say that this off-season has at least given some indication that Duke plans to "get older" via the portal not by developing 15-30 players. That would be more in line with how college basketball is trending these days. As Cal so elegantly said a couple days ago about the players who would be like #9-#11 on your roster, "why should I spend time developing them when they are just going to end up going somewhere else next year?"
 
I have no inside knowledge but I would say that this off-season has at least given some indication that Duke plans to "get older" via the portal not by developing 15-30 players. That would be more in line with how college basketball is trending these days. As Cal so elegantly said a couple days ago about the players who would be like #9-#11 on your roster, "why should I spend time developing them when they are just going to end up going somewhere else next year?"
Disagreeing with current version John Calipari about anything basketball related is the closest thing I know to a sure thing. Plus his comment is just so friggin selfish. Most folks who aren't good at their job try to offset that by being nice.

Agree with your larger point about getting experience via the portal. It does seem the more efficient and effective approach right now.
 
I have no inside knowledge but I would say that this off-season has at least given some indication that Duke plans to "get older" via the portal not by developing 15-30 players. That would be more in line with how college basketball is trending these days. As Cal so elegantly said a couple days ago about the players who would be like #9-#11 on your roster, "why should I spend time developing them when they are just going to end up going somewhere else next year?"

Here is a radical thought - outside of a top 5 recruit, why take any high schooler at all? Why shouldn't Jon go after the top 10 transfers every year? Unless there is a Zion or Paolo to come from HS, seems a top rated transfer will beat out a highly ranked HS player vast majority of the time.
 
Here is a radical thought - outside of a top 5 recruit, why take any high schooler at all? Why shouldn't Jon go after the top 10 transfers every year? Unless there is a Zion or Paolo to come from HS, seems a top rated transfer will beat out a highly ranked HS player vast majority of the time.

This is pretty much the debate for Duke given the current state. What is the magic number of recruits to recruit? Why spend countless hours, money and resources to recruit a kid in the ~15-30 if they are just gonna transfer when they don't play enough or are offered more by another school at the end of the year. You could make 1 phone call after the season and get a commitment from a grad transfer. I don't believe Gillis even visited. Easiest recruitment probably ever for Jon.
 
Here is a radical thought - outside of a top 5 recruit, why take any high schooler at all? Why shouldn't Jon go after the top 10 transfers every year? Unless there is a Zion or Paolo to come from HS, seems a top rated transfer will beat out a highly ranked HS player vast majority of the time.

Well, the problem is you don't know which high school recruits are going to pop and which ones are going to struggle a bit. Jared McCain was ranked very similarly to Sean Stewart according to the 247 composite (13 vs 17). One of them turned into a stud wing who was among the most dangerous players in college basketball, the other barely got regular minutes as a freshman. Caleb Foster (#19) and TJ Power (#20) were the same recruit in terms of rankings... not the same at all in terms of contribution both as freshman and as sophs.

And look at last year's Kentucky team. Justin Edwards (#3), Aaron Bradshaw (#4), and DJ Wagner (#6) seem like keepers... so why bother with #16 Robert Dillingham. Of course, Dillingham is likely to hear his name called in the top half of the lottery while the other guys are all shuffling off to new schools after decidedly mid freshman campaigns.

Don't even get me started on the best freshman in the country last year, Reed Sheppard... 247's composite has him as the #43 recruit in the class.

I suspect we will see something similar this year from the non-top 5 Duke freshmen. I bet a couple of them will pop and a couple of them will fall back a bit. But figuring out which will do which is pretty tough until they have at least been on campus for a few weeks.
 
This is pretty much the debate for Duke given the current state. What is the magic number of recruits to recruit? Why spend countless hours, money and resources to recruit a kid in the ~15-30 if they are just gonna transfer when they don't play enough or are offered more by another school at the end of the year. You could make 1 phone call after the season and get a commitment from a grad transfer. I don't believe Gillis even visited. Easiest recruitment probably ever for Jon.

This was the last year for which the 2020-2021 eligibility exemption applies, so there will not be any grad transfers unless there was a reshirt or they graduated in 3 years. That will change the equation a bit. Of course there are still unlimited undergrad transfers for those who have exceeded expectations and want to move up, provided Duke can accomodate their academic qualifications.
 
This was the last year for which the 2020-2021 eligibility exemption applies, so there will not be any grad transfers unless there was a reshirt or they graduated in 3 years. That will change the equation a bit. Of course there are still unlimited undergrad transfers for those who have exceeded expectations and want to move up, provided Duke can accomodate their academic qualifications.

There is lots of talk that the NCAA really likes the 5th year of eligibility rule and thinks it is something that goes hand in hand with their educational priorities as it allows more guys to graduate and get post0grad degrees. I will not be at all surprised if we soon hear that the NCAA is granting a 5th year of eligibility to anyone who graduates in 4 years and wants to continue their education in grad school.
 
There is lots of talk that the NCAA really likes the 5th year of eligibility rule and thinks it is something that goes hand in hand with their educational priorities as it allows more guys to graduate and get post0grad degrees. I will not be at all surprised if we soon hear that the NCAA is granting a 5th year of eligibility to anyone who graduates in 4 years and wants to continue their education in grad school.

Im not sure I’ve ever seen “NCAA” and “educational priorities” used in the same sentence. 😀

And I hope they don’t do this. Would mean a ton of school and national career records would fall to guys who played 5 years instead of 4, and those new “records” would be devalued, understandably.
 
Well, the problem is you don't know which high school recruits are going to pop and which ones are going to struggle a bit. Jared McCain was ranked very similarly to Sean Stewart according to the 247 composite (13 vs 17). One of them turned into a stud wing who was among the most dangerous players in college basketball, the other barely got regular minutes as a freshman. Caleb Foster (#19) and TJ Power (#20) were the same recruit in terms of rankings... not the same at all in terms of contribution both as freshman and as sophs.

And look at last year's Kentucky team. Justin Edwards (#3), Aaron Bradshaw (#4), and DJ Wagner (#6) seem like keepers... so why bother with #16 Robert Dillingham. Of course, Dillingham is likely to hear his name called in the top half of the lottery while the other guys are all shuffling off to new schools after decidedly mid freshman campaigns.

Don't even get me started on the best freshman in the country last year, Reed Sheppard... 247's composite has him as the #43 recruit in the class.

I suspect we will see something similar this year from the non-top 5 Duke freshmen. I bet a couple of them will pop and a couple of them will fall back a bit. But figuring out which will do which is pretty tough until they have at least been on campus for a few weeks.

Isn’t this kinda FastBreak’s point though? Because we don’t know what any of these non-Zion or Paolo HS recruits will do, just forget about em and focus just on the portal and the top 5 HS recruits? No you won’t hit 100% of even those top 5’s but you won’t miss many. Has Duke had a top 5 who wasn’t an excellent player as a freshman?

Im not advocating for this approach but a number of NCAA coaches have mused publicly about moving to the “not recruiting HS players anymore” model.
 
Isn’t this kinda FastBreak’s point though? Because we don’t know what any of these non-Zion or Paolo HS recruits will do, just forget about em and focus just on the portal and the top 5 HS recruits? No you won’t hit 100% of even those top 5’s but you won’t miss many. Has Duke had a top 5 who wasn’t an excellent player as a freshman?

Im not advocating for this approach but a number of NCAA coaches have mused publicly about moving to the “not recruiting HS players anymore” model.

My point is there are super valuable pieces to a championship puzzle that can be found outside the top 5 or so prospects in a high school class. Taking a flier on a few of them to see which ones pan out is still a very effective strategy. And even if they are not studs from day one, the one who are good but not OAD good can form the basis of a team's core in year's two or three (like Foster and Proctor are).

And it should not be overlooked that, at least for now, it appears the price tag on incoming freshmen is meaningfully cheaper than on established portal players. If your team is trying to figure out how to balance your NIL budget, having a couple/few relatively inexpensive freshmen can be a real boost.
 
My point is there are super valuable pieces to a championship puzzle that can be found outside the top 5 or so prospects in a high school class. Taking a flier on a few of them to see which ones pan out is still a very effective strategy. And even if they are not studs from day one, the one who are good but not OAD good can form the basis of a team's core in year's two or three (like Foster and Proctor are).

And it should not be overlooked that, at least for now, it appears the price tag on incoming freshmen is meaningfully cheaper than on established portal players. If your team is trying to figure out how to balance your NIL budget, having a couple/few relatively inexpensive freshmen can be a real boost.

5th year of eligibility? Maybe we could bring back an early incarnation of JJ, though I'm not sure we can afford him:

Langdon.jpg

Or maybe Duke tweeted out Trajan's photo since it was his birthday yesterday.

As for high school players, we're obviously going to recruit academically-eligible hs guys ranked #6-30 (as well as #1-5 and some of the guys 31-50). They are being recruited by every single team in the country. You don't think they'd be welcomed at UConn, Gonzaga, Virginia, and all of those other elite programs which tend not to successfully recruit first-level McD's A-A's? Sure, we can try to bring in elite seniors and "graduate students," (with quotation marks generally very much in bold), but there is also something to be said for recruiting the most talented players (who will be long out of college by age 21) and for trying to instill the local culture in freshmen (there's a reason boot camp is designed for 18 year olds). Interestingly, it seems that the 3 transfers we've brought in are not only excellent players and specific basketball fits, but they also bring with them a toughness that has been historically part of Duke's most successful teams--it's not that recent teams haven't been competitive and hard working, but I don't know that they've intimidated other teams. Depending on how things go, this team might be able to intimidate so that other teams play worse against us rather than better than their baseline. Though Duke's toughness has already been discussed ad nauseum by those of us sitting on our couches at home.

Anyway, I think we're just a little oversensitive about losing most of last year's freshmen--no reason to think that's going to be a Duke trend. If we hadn't recruited guys predicted to go 1 and 3 in the draft, we might not have lost any of the guys who'd been in line for rotation minutes. It's not like we're going to be recruiting guys like Boozer and Dybantsa every year!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top