Speculation from many Virginia fans has been that the timing was done to give Ron Sanchez a chance to prove himself as interim coach. Tony was set up in a good situation at Washington state and essentially handed a head coaching job he wouldn’t have gotten otherwise by his father. He clearly wanted to pay it forward with having one of his assistants replace him and had remarked as such many times. Unfortunately, the Uva athletic director had nixed any sort of “coach in waiting” or succession plan.With due respect that's an arrogant take. Yes he could do it for one more season. He "could do it" for five more seasons probably. That is NOT THE STANDARD. He said, and we should take him at his word, that he was no longer the right person to coach UVa. If you don't think you are THE MAN to coach a team, you should not coach the team. If you've ever coached, you understand that. Coaching at this level is not about "trying hard" or even "giving it your all" - if you don't believe with a passion that the job should be yours.....you cannot bring to it what it requires.
Also, this is all very disrespectful of the current UVa staff and players......like we're trying to protect all of them from the life changing horror of Bennett retiring. Do we hear ourselves???
Had he retired in March/April after the season ended, no matter what year it is, the AD would have had to make a permanent 3-4 year hire so that the new coach would be able to recruit the portal and high school players and/or current players to stay. If that is an outside coach, which it appears likely it would have been after a national search, then we are looking at a total rebuild with pretty much all new players and coaches and we are probably back to NC state level mediocrity at best at least at first.
We can’t compete with the big boys in NIL money and we have significant portal issues relating to qualifying academically, transfer credits and being able to graduate from Uva as a transfer (warley who transferred to Uva this year is not going to be able to and has to use his Virginia credits from his time here to send back to Florida state and he will graduate there). Even with Tony here, we did not get five star recruits, and did not recruit very well by the numbers until he was well established here. What he was able to do here was not easy and not any coach can do it when they are starting from scratch. In fact no other Uva coach prior to tony was ever able to come close. Four years of Ralph Sampson was as close as we ever got to this level of success.
Long story short, if we don’t leverage our brand and continue the program that Bennett built, we likely can’t come close to continuing to be the third best program in the ACC and sometimes challenging Duke and unc as the number one program on a given year.
Tony notably said on the first day of the job back in 2009 that he “wants to build something that lasts.” What he meant by that is that it lasts beyond his stay here.
My understanding of Duke’s situation is coach K basically handpicked Scheyer as his successor and the AD did not go out and interview guys like calipari and chris beard and Scott drew before settling on scheyer. If that had been the plan, and the duke AD refused to commit to hiring Ks successor and basically said they would take it into consideration but would make no promises, would anyone here have been surprised had coach k retired in October when an outside hire would be impossible so that Scheyer would at least be able to audition for the job by taking over the team for one season?
Tony did not get to pick his successor with the backing If the athletic department, and quite frankly the Uva bball program is in a more precarious situation than Duke’s was. No matter whom duke hires and how badly they fail, the program will remain a behemoth in the sport and you can just hire a new guy and move on. Not so with Uva. If we screw this hire up, we will be back to the years of making the tournament once every five years and it will be hard to climb out of that for a number of reasons.
The players like Ron Sanchez, he was the lead recruiter for many of them, and he had already taken over many day to day operations of the team. You can spin it that Bennett is screwing over his players but what do you think the players would rather have done - continuity from a coaching staff they are comfortable with with just the leader being replaced, or an entirely new staff that you have no relationship with and may not fit in terms of personality or playing style and where you may not be welcome and likely will have to portal somewhere else?
If ron Sanchez exceeds what are fairly modest preseason expectations this season, and it looks like there won’t be a rush to the portal from the guys we have going into next year, he is likely to get hired on a four year deal or more in the spring. To do otherwise would be very bold from our AD whereas it would not have been bold to go with an outside hire had Ron not been given that chance. Much of UVAs fan base is angered by this and wants an outside hire, by the way (they don’t believe Ron Sanchez is qualified or as good as other coaches - I am not part of that group btw).
Because we only graduate two players after this season - taine Murray and jalen warley - and are poised to have a very talented and experienced roster for 2025-26 that would be reminiscent of some of the old Bennett teams and it is unlikely the AD and big donors would want to throw that away just to hire an outside coach to start from scratch that had coaching success somewhere else, but for as to whom there is no idea whether they can compete with duke and Carolina and others in the acc.
Last edited: