And gets shut out every game.Nobody is taking that contract in a trade, so Jones will be on the market and my interest in the Giants' winning comes to an end. I hope they lose the rest of them.
Jones has two years remaining on his contract after 2024, with salaries of $30 million in 2025 and $46.5 million in 2026. None of that money is guaranteed at the moment, but $23 million of his 2025 salary is guaranteed against injury. That means if Jones were to suffer an injury that prevented him from being able to pass a physical next March, the Giants would owe him that $23 million whether or not he's on the team. This is the argument for sitting him down now -- to avoid a situation in which he does get hurt, putting the Giants on the hook for that money.
Jones' contract situation.Separate from the injury guarantee, if Jones is on the Giants' roster on the fifth day of the 2025 league year, $12 million of his salary for 2025 becomes fully guaranteed. This would be the argument for cutting him -- even if he's healthy -- before the start of the league year in March.
yeah, same page for me. He showed some real promise, then it faded. Happy he got his $80 million (I lost a bet on that, did not think he merited $40 million/yr as much as I liked him). My Duke football pals and I were quite stunned when the Giants took him sixth...In addition to the financial aspect, DeVito did an OK job last year and Lock may be looked at as more of the same as Daniel brought to the team.
Being a Giant's fan, I was shocked they took Daniel so high in the draft (even though I have been told by Washington fans that their GM was going to take him #17 that year). However, I have been a big defender of his because he never got to play behind a decent pass protecting line or with good receivers.
I can't do that anymore. Too many bad passes. Too many failures to avoid the rush when more nimble or aware quarterbacks would have been able to do so. Too many turnovers. And most of all, too many indecisive plays where there were receivers open and for some reason Daniel wasn't able to pull the trigger. Regrettably, it's time for a change.
Your Giants are facing an extended period of rot; just like my Deadskins prior to this year. Cutting Jones best for both parties.In addition to the financial aspect, DeVito did an OK job last year and Lock may be looked at as more of the same as Daniel brought to the team.
Being a Giant's fan, I was shocked they took Daniel so high in the draft (even though I have been told by Washington fans that their GM was going to take him #17 that year). However, I have been a big defender of his because he never got to play behind a decent pass protecting line or with good receivers.
I can't do that anymore. Too many bad passes. Too many failures to avoid the rush when more nimble or aware quarterbacks would have been able to do so. Too many turnovers. And most of all, too many indecisive plays where there were receivers open and for some reason Daniel wasn't able to pull the trigger. Regrettably, it's time for a change.
Except I hope they beat the Cowboys.Nobody is taking that contract in a trade, so Jones will be on the market and my interest in the Giants' winning comes to an end. I hope they lose the rest of them.
Interesting. Thanks. Though other than the 40% of snaps and possibly the first two passing incentives, the rest of those are extremely unlikely for Lock to hit this late in the season. But at this point, I am happy having DeVito. My kids have been begging to go to a Giants game and tickets might be really cheap - this could be our chance, though it will be really depressing.Why Tommy Devito (who is QB3) and not Drew Lock (who is QB2)? Lock's contract details.
View attachment 18666
Giants are tanking snd don't want to spend any money.
This year was particularly disappointing. The protection, particularly, though not exclusively, before Thomas got hurt was better than in the past, and there were lots of instances where there was time and open targets, and Jones either didn't go through his progressions to find the open guy, or simply couldn't effectively get the ball there for anything beyond 10-15 yards. Pretty rough position to be in when hitting the market.I can't do that anymore. Too many bad passes. Too many failures to avoid the rush when more nimble or aware quarterbacks would have been able to do so. Too many turnovers. And most of all, too many indecisive plays where there were receivers open and for some reason Daniel wasn't able to pull the trigger. Regrettably, it's time for a change.
I'll be happy with a tie.Except I hope they beat the Cowboys.
Your post got me wondering about Duke QBs in the NFL. Here's a list off of the top of my head of QBs who took at least one snap from under center, and the team the played for (as a QB)Former Duke QB Al Woodall had a very nice career backing up Joe Namath back in the day. And so did Don Strock backing up Dan Marino. Although I’m sure both would rather have been starters.
Given his competitive nature, I suspect that Daniel would also relish an opportunity to show the Giants and their fans that they sold him short, which he could do by demonstrating that he is a capable QB who can deliver wins if surrounded by teammates who are reasonably skilled and willing to play hard.Nice analysis, but he's made $100 million. Why go back to being a backup at a fraction of what he's been making? A good student, with courses in finance, he could do well investing his own money.
I expect him to continue playing, however. Football is in his blood.
You forgot Thad Lewis who started games for both Cleveland and Buffalo and won a couple of them too. I think he was also a backup in Philly when Chip Kelly was there.Your post got me wondering about Duke QBs in the NFL. Here's a list off of the top of my head of QBs who took at least one snap from under center, and the team the played for (as a QB)
Ace Parker (NY Yankees, Brooklyn Dodgers, Boston Yanks)
Sonny Jurgensen (Redskins)
Ben Bennett (Bengals)
Anthony Dilweg (Packers)
Dave Brown (Giants)
Daniel Jones (Giants)
Al Woodall (Jets)
Sean Renfree (Falcons)
Leo Hart (Falcons)
think that's it, maybe Quentin Harris??
Good point. And frankly why risk permanent brain damage...Nice analysis, but he's made $100 million. Why go back to being a backup at a fraction of what he's been making? A good student, with courses in finance, he could do well investing his own money.
I expect him to continue playing, however. Football is in his blood.