ND /Texas A&M how many synonym phrases are there for poetic justice?

Both transfers are fine. Both kids did what they felt was in their best interests... as would we all. I wish both of them nothing but success—they represented Duke admirably while they were here. While I don't know either personally, they both seem like wonderful individuals.
Yeah, some of the posters on these boards seem a little...unsophisticated? Like I really LOL'd as you kids say a couple of seasons ago when one poster wanted to know why basketball games couldn't be scheduled a week or so in advance between two major teams because then you would know who's good. Apparently this individual believed that major stadiums sit idle with security personnel, vendors, parking, traffic plans, legal agreements, cleaners and supplies of food, ready to schedule any random comers. Similarly, everyone loved Elko to death, wanted to pay him millions, and then he left and they were all like the girl in the famous meme who sees her date staring at another girl. So a lot of them, I guess kind of vaguely aware that almost everyone takes a better job when offered, focused their hurt on "I don't like the way he left." LOL again, do they really think Elko had any control over that part of the process? Whatever he may have wanted to do at that point you can be sure that in the real world the Duke administration wasn't like "Please stay around a bit and recruit some of our players, hire away some more staff and be sure and download as much of the playbooks as you like." Nope. DUKE was the ones going GTFO and if you so much as like one of player's posts as the coach another team we'll report you to the NCAA.
 
LOL again, do they really think Elko had any control over that part of the process?
Elko was being recruited; he absolutely had enough control to say "I cannot go with you tonight, I need enough time to close out my current job with tact and class." He did not have the stones to do that.
DUKE was the ones going GTFO and if you so much as like one of player's posts as the coach another team we'll report you to the NCAA.
I have seen no reports of this, what am I missing?
 
Yeah, some of the posters on these boards seem a little...unsophisticated? Like I really LOL'd as you kids say a couple of seasons ago when one poster wanted to know why basketball games couldn't be scheduled a week or so in advance between two major teams because then you would know who's good. Apparently this individual believed that major stadiums sit idle with security personnel, vendors, parking, traffic plans, legal agreements, cleaners and supplies of food, ready to schedule any random comers. Similarly, everyone loved Elko to death, wanted to pay him millions, and then he left and they were all like the girl in the famous meme who sees her date staring at another girl. So a lot of them, I guess kind of vaguely aware that almost everyone takes a better job when offered, focused their hurt on "I don't like the way he left." LOL again, do they really think Elko had any control over that part of the process? Whatever he may have wanted to do at that point you can be sure that in the real world the Duke administration wasn't like "Please stay around a bit and recruit some of our players, hire away some more staff and be sure and download as much of the playbooks as you like." Nope. DUKE was the ones going GTFO and if you so much as like one of player's posts as the coach another team we'll report you to the NCAA.
This is total nonsense, sorry. Departing FBS coaches meet with the team they’re leaving. Elko and a UConn coach 15 or so years ago—who both got roasted by fans and the media—are the *only* known exceptions.
 
I get why Elko took the A&M job. As much as it pains me to write it, it is a better job than Duke. He will be better compensated and have more resources than he would ever had at Duke. That being written, A&M is more than likely a job where you are hired to be fired. He had a chance to create something special at Duke. The bar is so much more reasonable at Duke. How many here would be ecstatic with annual bowling and an occasional run at an ACC title? I know I would. I'd imagine the bar is set a tad differently at A&M.

As for Riley, it's the environment. It stinks and I wish he chose a less travelled path, but it is what it is.
 
I get why Elko took the A&M job. As much as it pains me to write it, it is a better job than Duke. He will be better compensated and have more resources than he would ever had at Duke. That being written, A&M is more than likely a job where you are hired to be fired. He had a chance to create something special at Duke. The bar is so much more reasonable at Duke. How many here would be ecstatic with annual bowling and an occasional run at an ACC title? I know I would. I'd imagine the bar is set a tad differently at A&M.

As for Riley, it's the environment. It stinks and I wish he chose a less travelled path, but it is what it is.
This is the biggest roadblock for Duke football. A game at Duke (a handful of exceptions notwithstanding) feels more like a high school environment than a Big Time environment.

Clemson last year was amazing. But far far more games are on a Saturday in the sun and heat with lots of empty hot seats.
 
I get why Elko took the A&M job. As much as it pains me to write it, it is a better job than Duke. He will be better compensated and have more resources than he would ever had at Duke. That being written, A&M is more than likely a job where you are hired to be fired. He had a chance to create something special at Duke. The bar is so much more reasonable at Duke. How many here would be ecstatic with annual bowling and an occasional run at an ACC title? I know I would. I'd imagine the bar is set a tad differently at A&M.

As for Riley, it's the environment. It stinks and I wish he chose a less travelled path, but it is what it is.
I don't think anyone here doesn't "get" why Elko took the Aggy job. The (wrong) point that we're wrestling with today is the resurrected notion that it was totally OK for him to flee into the night without meeting with his team.
 
Elko was being recruited; he absolutely had enough control to say "I cannot go with you tonight, I need enough time to close out my current job with tact and class." He did not have the stones to do that.

I have seen no reports of this, what am I missing?
I agree with Rocketeli. The AD at A&M was under a lot of heat. Elko had been hired, and this was his new boss. He said "Jump" and Mike asked, "How high?"

The military term is FYGMO. As in, to the current commander, but spoken sotto voce "Eff you, I've got my orders."

This fast departure is a big nothing.
 
I agree with Rocketeli. The AD at A&M was under a lot of heat. Elko had been hired, and this was his new boss. He said "Jump" and Mike asked, "How high?"

The military term is FYGMO. As in, to the current commander, but spoken sotto voce "Eff you, I've got my orders."

This fast departure is a big nothing.
No, it isn't. It is vanishingly rare, it is dishonorable, and it is rightly worthy of derision.
 
I don't think anyone here doesn't "get" why Elko took the Aggy job. The (wrong) point that we're wrestling with today is the resurrected notion that it was totally OK for him to flee into the night without meeting with his team.
How anyone can think it is okay for a professional to skulk off in the middle of the night is beyond me. Elko set a flamethrower to much of the goodwill he built up with his exit.
 
Well, he's the starting QB on a national championship contender, so there's that.

His runs against aTm might have seemed labored because they have one of the better defensive front 7 in college football and ND replaced their entire offensive line from last season, starting 2 freshman and 3 sophomores—five guys who had a total of 6 combined starts prior to Saturday. To say that they were concerned about the ability of that green line to hold against perhaps the most talented defensive front they will face this season is an understatement. Leonard threw 30 passes, only 3 of which were longer than 10 yards downfield. Most passes were quick, short routes that didn't require that green offensive line to hold a pocket for very long—Leonard held the ball on average for just over 2 seconds before throwing to a receiver. ND ran the ball a tad more than they threw it.

In other words, Marcus Freeman and his new OC, Mike Denbrock, wanted to simplify the game for their OLine, focusing the offense on quick dink-and-dunk passing and straightforward runs, understanding that Kyle field is a nightmare for opposing teams (highly ranked LSU and Alabama teams have both lost there in recent years, among others) and gets extremely loud, so best to make things as easy as possible for brand new starters. Knowing that ND also has one of the best defenses in the country this season, they likely concluded that in all likelihood the game would require both teams to manage field position and patiently take advantage of any scoring opportunities that came their way, which is exactly how the game played out.

Who knows how the season will play out in the end, but their OLine will never be as inexperienced and in a back-against-the-wall situation as they were on Saturday night. Leaning on their D and being opportunistic on O was the right strategy for the context. They'll be able to open up the offense more as that OLine matures throughout the season.
I watched the whole game. This is a great write-up. It's a big win for Riley and ND in that environment. He has a chance to have a special season there. Great kid. I wish he were still in Durham but I'm happy for him.
 
Elko was being recruited; he absolutely had enough control to say "I cannot go with you tonight, I need enough time to close out my current job with tact and class." He did not have the stones to do that.

I have seen no reports of this, what am I missing?

I will defer to you, since you were clearly there during the negotiations, given assertive nature of your comment. As for me, having not been present for any of the negotiations, I prefer not to cast aspersions.
 
I will defer to you, since you were clearly there during the negotiations, given assertive nature of your comment. As for me, having not been present for any of the negotiations, I prefer not to cast aspersions.
I wasn't there either, but who cares.... Some on this board think Mike Elko should burn in hell-- right next to the Heels collective -- not because he left for A&M, but because he failed to say goodbye properly nine months ago.

I mean, get a grip. Bosses leave; coaches leave. Circumstances differ, but life goes on. Except maybe here....
 
I wasn't there either, but who cares.... Some on this board think Mike Elko should burn in hell-- right next to the Heels collective -- not because he left for A&M, but because he failed to say goodbye properly nine months ago.

I mean, get a grip. Bosses leave; coaches leave. Circumstances differ, but life goes on. Except maybe here....
I don't think anyone should lose any sleep over it, but the way Elko left without even meeting with his players does reflect negatively on his character IMO.

I definitely don't judge any Duke football fans who choose to call him Midnight Mike for the next 30 years. 😁
 
He’s Midnight Mike forever. I try not to engage in too much morose delectation (stupid Catholic school education making me use that term), but watching him with his dumb glasses stare at the play sheet in complete astonishment as Riley beat A&M felt great

It hurts that Riley left. And if Elko didn’t go, maybe I’d be more bitter about it. But Elko leaving after using his kids education as a recruiting tactic (literally telling recruits he’s not leaving because he doesn’t want his kids to move again until end of high school) is just too slimey for me to ever feel anything but anger

Won’t comment on some of the other less savory rumors out there that appear to be hinted at in this thread as well, but they don’t sit well with me either
 
I wasn't there either, but who cares.... Some on this board think Mike Elko should burn in hell-- right next to the Heels collective -- not because he left for A&M, but because he failed to say goodbye properly nine months ago.

I mean, get a grip. Bosses leave; coaches leave. Circumstances differ, but life goes on. Except maybe here....
I find your perspective dumbfounding.
 
I will defer to you, since you were clearly there during the negotiations, given assertive nature of your comment. As for me, having not been present for any of the negotiations, I prefer not to cast aspersions.
For balance, I think it’s justified for people to think this is really bad decorum on the part of Mike (regardless of the circumstances) and cast aspersions given the actions may not live up to their own personal moral code. Some people might not care, others will

It’s not worth re-litigating, but personal view, he definitively could have told his new employer “I need to talk to my team” at a minimum. And if he did and A&M said no, my personal view is that he should have told them to pound sand. Thats not the type of person you should be doing business with. And money wise, Mike was getting paid well (he’s only getting $7mm at A&M, and while the details aren’t public, speculation is that we were close to $4-5mm), and other high profile opportunities would come if he wanted. Mike just demonstrated that he didn’t care enough about his players (or was too selfish) to do the right thing. Thats my personal view
 
Back
Top