ND /Texas A&M how many synonym phrases are there for poetic justice?

Paterno versus Rupp?

I'll confess something: I really don't understand the negative vibes toward Riley Leonard unless you plan to do the same for Jeremy Roach, and I don't think you do. What's the difference? That Duke football lost to Notre Dame last season, but Duke basketball beat Baylor? That Roach wasn't injured in that game? That Leonard moved up to a bigger football program, while Roach's transfer was more lateral? That Roach was at Duke for 4 years, while Leonard was here for 3? That we somehow care more that Leonard pulled a Sam Hartman, while Roach pulled a RayJ Dennis? That we don't know any cute stories about how Mama Roach motivates her son with ironic criticism?

Please don't take this as a call to be equally negative toward Jeremy Roach. As you can probably tell, I see the two transfers as somewhat similar, and am okay with both. I just get the impression that Leonard's departure is seen as a betrayal, while Roach's move is natural, or just business, or something.
Riley's departure was unfortunate, but maybe to be expected. I watched the 2d half, and I don't remember any problems with pass protection by the OL. That could have been an issue with staying at Duke.
 
Paterno versus Rupp?

I'll confess something: I really don't understand the negative vibes toward Riley Leonard unless you plan to do the same for Jeremy Roach, and I don't think you do. What's the difference? That Duke football lost to Notre Dame last season, but Duke basketball beat Baylor? That Roach wasn't injured in that game? That Leonard moved up to a bigger football program, while Roach's transfer was more lateral? That Roach was at Duke for 4 years, while Leonard was here for 3? That we somehow care more that Leonard pulled a Sam Hartman, while Roach pulled a RayJ Dennis? That we don't know any cute stories about how Mama Roach motivates her son with ironic criticism?

Please don't take this as a call to be equally negative toward Jeremy Roach. As you can probably tell, I see the two transfers as somewhat similar, and am okay with both. I just get the impression that Leonard's departure is seen as a betrayal, while Roach's move is natural, or just business, or something.
I suspect part of it is that our basketball program isn't struggling for relevance. When one "gets away" it's frustrating.

But I'm with you. I don't wish ill will on folx who lined up on the court or field wearing a Duke jersey.

Except for Rasheed Sulaimon. That's my personal issue.
 
I still don't see how Leonard is considered a national championship-caliber QB.

In his last three games at Duke, his completion percentages were 44.4, 43.8 and 39.1.

He can run, sure, but then he takes open-field hits. His runs against A&M seemed labored -- we can't forget that he had a decent offensive line at Duke. (People often forget that one of the keys to Spurrier's last season was that he had an offensive line made up of talented upperclassmen.)

He's fun to watch, and I'll be rooting for him whenever they're not playing USC. But I don't think he'll get the Irish very far in the playoffs. I actually wouldn't be at all shocked if they lost to Georgia Tech.
 
I still don't see how Leonard is considered a national championship-caliber QB.

In his last three games at Duke, his completion percentages were 44.4, 43.8 and 39.1.

He can run, sure, but then he takes open-field hits. His runs against A&M seemed labored -- we can't forget that he had a decent offensive line at Duke. (People often forget that one of the keys to Spurrier's last season was that he had an offensive line made up of talented upperclassmen.)

He's fun to watch, and I'll be rooting for him whenever they're not playing USC. But I don't think he'll get the Irish very far in the playoffs. I actually wouldn't be at all shocked if they lost to Georgia Tech.
Riley is a good young man and great running QB but I don’t see NFL potential. Notre Dame needs him to be a game manager, but it is hard to see that offense being enough to win against the top teams. The rest of Notre Dame’s schedule is very favorable to get to the playoffs though, so the Irish have a chance to have a great season…
 
Riley is a good young man and great running QB but I don’t see NFL potential. Notre Dame needs him to be a game manager, but it is hard to see that offense being enough to win against the top teams. The rest of Notre Dame’s schedule is very favorable to get to the playoffs though, so the Irish have a chance to have a great season…
Well, I never pegged Daniel Jones as NFL talent. Make of that whatever you will.
 
I can't think of any transfers upon whom I wish ill. I remained a huge fan of Jamal Boykin.

For this year's transfers, I don't root for any of the schools to which they transferred. I like Roach. I don't like Baylor.
 
I can't think of any transfers upon whom I wish ill. I remained a huge fan of Jamal Boykin.

For this year's transfers, I don't root for any of the schools to which they transferred. I like Roach. I don't like Baylor.
It's difficult to be as emotionally invested (positive or negative) when there's this massive flood of transfers. It feels different than it did 20 years ago.

But then what doesn't?
 
Paterno versus Rupp?

I'll confess something: I really don't understand the negative vibes toward Riley Leonard unless you plan to do the same for Jeremy Roach, and I don't think you do. What's the difference? That Duke football lost to Notre Dame last season, but Duke basketball beat Baylor? That Roach wasn't injured in that game? That Leonard moved up to a bigger football program, while Roach's transfer was more lateral? That Roach was at Duke for 4 years, while Leonard was here for 3? That we somehow care more that Leonard pulled a Sam Hartman, while Roach pulled a RayJ Dennis? That we don't know any cute stories about how Mama Roach motivates her son with ironic criticism?

Please don't take this as a call to be equally negative toward Jeremy Roach. As you can probably tell, I see the two transfers as somewhat similar, and am okay with both. I just get the impression that Leonard's departure is seen as a betrayal, while Roach's move is natural, or just business, or something.
I did not mention Leonard. ND tampered.
 
Paterno versus Rupp?

I'll confess something: I really don't understand the negative vibes toward Riley Leonard unless you plan to do the same for Jeremy Roach, and I don't think you do. What's the difference? That Duke football lost to Notre Dame last season, but Duke basketball beat Baylor? That Roach wasn't injured in that game? That Leonard moved up to a bigger football program, while Roach's transfer was more lateral? That Roach was at Duke for 4 years, while Leonard was here for 3? That we somehow care more that Leonard pulled a Sam Hartman, while Roach pulled a RayJ Dennis? That we don't know any cute stories about how Mama Roach motivates her son with ironic criticism?

Please don't take this as a call to be equally negative toward Jeremy Roach. As you can probably tell, I see the two transfers as somewhat similar, and am okay with both. I just get the impression that Leonard's departure is seen as a betrayal, while Roach's move is natural, or just business, or something.
Are you suggesting there is logic involved in reactions?
 
I still don't see how Leonard is considered a national championship-caliber QB.

In his last three games at Duke, his completion percentages were 44.4, 43.8 and 39.1.

He can run, sure, but then he takes open-field hits. His runs against A&M seemed labored -- we can't forget that he had a decent offensive line at Duke. (People often forget that one of the keys to Spurrier's last season was that he had an offensive line made up of talented upperclassmen.)

He's fun to watch, and I'll be rooting for him whenever they're not playing USC. But I don't think he'll get the Irish very far in the playoffs. I actually wouldn't be at all shocked if they lost to Georgia Tech.

Well, he's the starting QB on a national championship contender, so there's that.

His runs against aTm might have seemed labored because they have one of the better defensive front 7 in college football and ND replaced their entire offensive line from last season, starting 2 freshman and 3 sophomores—five guys who had a total of 6 combined starts prior to Saturday. To say that they were concerned about the ability of that green line to hold against perhaps the most talented defensive front they will face this season is an understatement. Leonard threw 30 passes, only 3 of which were longer than 10 yards downfield. Most passes were quick, short routes that didn't require that green offensive line to hold a pocket for very long—Leonard held the ball on average for just over 2 seconds before throwing to a receiver. ND ran the ball a tad more than they threw it.

In other words, Marcus Freeman and his new OC, Mike Denbrock, wanted to simplify the game for their OLine, focusing the offense on quick dink-and-dunk passing and straightforward runs, understanding that Kyle field is a nightmare for opposing teams (highly ranked LSU and Alabama teams have both lost there in recent years, among others) and gets extremely loud, so best to make things as easy as possible for brand new starters. Knowing that ND also has one of the best defenses in the country this season, they likely concluded that in all likelihood the game would require both teams to manage field position and patiently take advantage of any scoring opportunities that came their way, which is exactly how the game played out.

Who knows how the season will play out in the end, but their OLine will never be as inexperienced and in a back-against-the-wall situation as they were on Saturday night. Leaning on their D and being opportunistic on O was the right strategy for the context. They'll be able to open up the offense more as that OLine matures throughout the season.
 
Back
Top