SkyBrickey
Member
I don't think we will sell out to stop Love. We will defend everyone like we have all year.I'd like to follow up again on MChambers' Brendan Marks quote & use some of Brevity's data above:
Caleb Love stats
In 5 wins: 20.8 points, 4.6 assists, 3.4 rebounds, 44% FG, 36.4% from 3, 96.3% (!!) on FTs
In 4 losses: 9.8 points, 3.8 assists, 3.3 rebounds, 28% FG, 14.8% from 3, 58.3% on FTs
AZ Stats
82.2 ppg average
Duke Stats
83.2 ppg average
I've seen a lot of posts suggesting we gear defense to stop Caleb Love. Was wondering if it's insane to do the opposite-- let Caleb get his, but limit everyone else. Caleb averages about 17ppg, which leaves about 65 points for the rest of the team.
Caleb has a career high of 35 points (Against Oregon on 1/27/24: 12-18 with 5 3s). Even if we let him get his career high, but limit everyone else's scoring, maybe we'd be better off? I'm guessing if we focused on stopping everyone but Love, we could hold the rest of the team to 33 points (reduce their output by 50%) and they'd only score 68 (keep in mind their whole team only scored 55 against us in November, although I'm aware these are not the same two teams). Also, allowing Caleb the relative freedom to become the "I'm the man watch me shoot an off-balance 28 footer" Caleb is like giving a drunk an open bar-- he's bound to get carried away with himself and shoot them into trouble. It might also further undermine the rest of the team if they start Caleb-watching b/c they know they're not going to get the ball.
I know it's dangerous because Caleb is not limited to his career high and my math is extremely far from rigorous, but I'm thinking out loud. Have at it and tell me why I'm dumb.
The one big question is what kind of coverage do we play on the big man screens for Love. Jon has employed all strategies this year. With Maliq out it's not as simple as just switching 1-5.