With the caveat that it's really early, I'd say it's starting 5 (gap) the old men and the 3 (big gap) Evans and Harris.History is on your side for sure, but I guess a lot depends on how big the dropoff is from those eight to the last two.....
With the caveat that it's really early, I'd say it's starting 5 (gap) the old men and the 3 (big gap) Evans and Harris.History is on your side for sure, but I guess a lot depends on how big the dropoff is from those eight to the last two.....
undeniably true. But that conflicts with Jon's stated desire for more continuity.....if guys nine and ten don't get to play,they'll get tons of offers to leave....so I'm a bit hopeful Jon finds a way to keep them happy.It isn't so much that James and Gillis are a lot better than Evans and Harris. It's the fact that in CBB, you have so little time to get your team to blend and gel. You need every rep you can get with your top guys on the court. And 8 core guys are a perfect number to win a championship.
Let's just blow out 90% of the teams we play and they should get plenty of minutes.undeniably true. But that conflicts with Jon's stated desire for more continuity.....if guys nine and ten don't get to play,they'll get tons of offers to leave....so I'm a bit hopeful Jon finds a way to keep them happy.
Kedsy used to try to narrow the number of games counted for "rotation/significant minutes" purposes, focusing on "highly competitive" and "conference" games. I was/am in the school of "all minutes at Duke are meaningful," given the intensity of effort.Yes, when we have comfortable leads. But I will bet we only go 8 deep for the highly competitive games.
Yes, PackMan, I read that like you meant it - "Sun Devils".I found the Devils to be uninspiring on offens and defense. There is definitely much growth for this team. I shudder to think what will happen when they play an experienced team.
Kedsy used to try to narrow the number of games counted for "rotation/significant minutes" purposes, focusing on "highly competitive" and "conference" games. I was/am in the school of "all minutes at Duke are meaningful," given the intensity of effort.
I expect 9-10 players to average 10 or so minutes per game. Our recruiting and roster composition clearly point in this direction. And, yep, that means it's a whole new world, Aladdin.
Now, of course, my "hedge factor" is that, although I hope not, there will likely be injuries that mean that more players are called into action.
We could always do UNC’s “Blue Line” and just sub in a whole second team.Moreover, since Jon says he wants more continuity, he simply can't be letting highly rated recruits languish on the bench or they will likely be gone....from what little we saw last night, players 1-10 at this point all merit some court time.
Because you think Jon will sacrifice a bit of winning to keep Evans and Harris happy?
This is the way. The Celts and Mavs were first and second in the NBA in 3-pt attempt rate last season. The Celts led the NBA at 47.1%.Will we play faster and attempt more 3s? It's hard to judge based on two blowout exhibition wins, but we are trending in the right direction.
First 2 years under Scheyer
Field goals attempted per game - 57.75
3s attempted per game - 20.65
% of FGs from 3 - 35.7%
First 2 exhibition games this year
Field goals attempted per game - 71
3s attempted per game - 35.5
% of FGs from 3 - 50%
For reference sake, the best teams with high % of shots from 3 last season were BYU at 50.4, Creighton at 48.5 and Alabama at 46.5.
I'm not so sure about this. K had a philosophy/idea that the longer the time your top players spent playing together, the more they starred to play as a unit, rather than as a collection of players, and the more they began to intuitively know where their teammates were going to be at any given time in the game.Yeah, this is the thing. I never had the feeling even with K that the philosophy was "we have a short bench because it is always optimal to have a short bench." It's dictated by personnel.
i think it largely depends on the style of play that gives the team the best chance of winning. If the style we saw vs. ASU is most effective, then it seems likely that 10 guys will play. If the team needs to slow down and play more conservatively, fewer guys will play. Which doesn't differ much from what you said...I do not think Scheyer is going to sacrifice any equity this season for the sake of maybe pleasing players 8-12 enough that they come back next year, particularly not in the Cooper Flagg year. He is going to play the players that give him the best chance to win any given game, with a secondary consideration to seasonal development. I don’t think K was any different.
Thank you for the information and game link! I had seen something online prior to the game that they were airing the interview at halftime so that's why I said that. I appreciate your help!There was a brief interview, but I don't think it took place at halftime. I checked, and ESPN's full replay doesn't show it then. What I saw took place in the first half; you can find it at about the 11:30 mark of this YouTube full replay.
Duke MBB finally has an Every Bucket video for the ASU game. I'm sure it took a while to put together.
And some reactions...
![]()
Kon Knueppel’s heater, observations from Duke basketball’s exhibition vs Arizona State
Here are six observations from Duke basketball's exhibition game against Arizona State on Sunday night at Cameron Indoor Stadium.www.fayobserver.com
Jon Rothstein: Duke drills Arizona State 103-47 in Durham. Blue Devils were elite defensively. And Kon Knueppel? Looks like he'll be this team's second-leading scorer behind Cooper Flagg.
Adam Zagoria: Bobby Hurley said he’s most impressed with Cooper Flagg’s will to to win: "He looks like the real deal to me"
Jamie Shaw: Khaman Maluach and Jayden Quaintance has been an interesting matchup in this one.Maluach’s size has caused consistent issues at the rim, but the twitchy athleticism of Quaintance has led to his own production.
Trilly Donovan: Exhibition overreaction: Kon Knueppel might end up being better than Reed Sheppard was last year.
I don't think we played 10 guys extended minutes last night because of style of play. We did it because it was an absolute blowout. All of our starters played about 20 min each.i think it largely depends on the style of play that gives the team the best chance of winning. If the style we saw vs. ASU is most effective, then it seems likely that 10 guys will play. If the team needs to slow down and play more conservatively, fewer guys will play. Which doesn't differ much from what you said...
You mean the Kon Knueppel year?I do not think Scheyer is going to sacrifice any equity this season for the sake of maybe pleasing players 8-12 enough that they come back next year, particularly not in the Cooper Flagg year. He is going to play the players that give him the best chance to win any given game, with a secondary consideration to seasonal development. I don’t think K was any different.
I think you are low on Khaman. Once DLII got his fouling under control, he was routinely playing north of 25 minutes. It's early, but Khaman seems to be good at limiting his fouls. That being said, prepare yourself for him fouling out before the first media timeout when Duke plays at UNC.I don't think we played 10 guys extended minutes last night because of style of play. We did it because it was an absolute blowout. All of our starters played about 20 min each.
I think during super competitive games, we are going to see Kon, Cooper, Caleb, Tyrese on the floor for a lot of minutes. Here's my refresh on what I expect to see:
Cooper - 35
Kon, Caleb, Tyrese - 30
Khaman - 25
Sion - 20
Maliq, Mason - 15