DevilHorse
Member
I haven't seen anything to indicate training techniques have changed for the TBreds. However, I think that advances in veterinarian related things has improved dramatically. I imagine that trainers are smarter about chemical things (thanks to Vet input), as well as diagnostic techniques. I think surgeries now for things like a flipped palate and leg injuries have advanced quite a bit.Thanks for the links. The article on handicap races and weights is another reminder of how much the game has changed over the fifty years I have been sporadically watching it. Some think the horses are more fragile, but similar changes have occurred in human sports too. I remember when Mike McGee was coaching Duke football and he went with three a day practices. That would be an NCAA infraction today. But on the flip side at least with human athletes the strength and conditioning trainers and routines are far superior to the old days. Have horse training techniques changed that much over the last few decades?
I may have mentioned long ago how Ruffian's sire Reviewer had many leg problems, and his progeny suffered from leg problems significantly more than the average TBred. So problems can be propagated. In contrast, a Standardbred (SBred) named Good Time is recognized as having his progeny much less prone to injury than the average SBred; you see quite a few inbreds to Good Time. So there is hope that when a potent sire that is sound and fast, can pass on those traits to the TBred genome.
Additionally, there are different training techniques that go in and out of vogue. For example, interval training is a training philosophy that is popular in europe. It can be done for TBreds and SBreds. In fact, several SBred training facilities in North America have built interval training tracks (they are different than ovals) to help foment more training.
Larry
DevilHorse