FB: Duke 26, UConn 21

The biggest "what if" scenario is if Murphy's pass isn't batted in the air and then ran back for a pick 6, how the rest of the game goes. Duke was on the UConn side of the 50 and moving the ball pretty well.
This play is more indicative of the questionable decisions made by Murphy on his throws. Yes it was a freak play that it bounces to the guy that could run it back untouched. However, the ball should never have been thrown. The guy doing the "batting" didn't really do that. Murphy basically bounced it off of the guy. I don't think the ball was even out of his hand before it contacted the defender.

On another topic, I was finding Steve Addazio, who also was on the Elon broadcast, a bit annoying with things he was saying that I knew were factually wrong. However, he did make some good points about things in the game that most don't notice. The most insightful one was that, while having an excellent rushing game, Star Thomas needs to improve his pass protection skills. I'm sure the coaching staff will see it on the film and address it with him if they didn't already do it in game.
 
But as Budwom pointed out, if the receiver runs the wrong route, he often won't be within 10 yards of the pass. If you notice something in the defensive alignment and audible to a different set of routes to take advantage of it, success depends upon both the QB and receiver(s) knowing exactly what you're switching to. So, for example, If the QB thinks the receiver will be switching to a post or a slant but the receiver runs a dig or a curl or an out, then the ball will look like it's sailing into the wheat fields way over the receiver's head. If you watch NFL QBs who are really good passers, they're usually making the throw before the receiver cuts in anticipation of where the receiver is going. If they wait to make sure the receiver makes the correct cut [runs the correct route], it's already too late. QBs who do that end up throwing behind their receivers because the ball gets there too late.
thank you sir, that is exactly right. On such a play, it is not at all unusual for the ball and the receiver to be many yards apart.
 
My recollection which isn’t that good is that neither Leo Hart or Ben Bennet were very good at running. I didn’t see Bennet play in person much so maybe wrong. Leo definitely didn’t run much. The point is if Murphy has the success of either, we don’t need to worry about whether he can run. He certainly appears to have a hell of an arm. I get excited every time he launches a long pass. Also noteworthy that neither Leo’s or Ben’s teams had much of a defense. Our defense is looking pretty good this year considering all the loses of stud players from last year.
 
Somewhat off topic here (maybe I should post it in the Duke football thread) but, so far, I like what I see of Manny Diaz as the coach. I can't speak to his abilities with X's and O's but from what I have seen in the first three games, he seems to have a likeable enthusiasm for the game and the players. Maybe this will change once Duke begins to lose more games but so far he seems to have a very positive and caring relationship with his players and to be happy to be the Duke coach. I know we can't criticize Midnight Mike for his above-average record in his three years here (he definitely overachieved), but I always though he looked to be extremely unhappy on the sidelines, like he was severely constipated. Plus, he was always dressed so badly with not exactly a svelte body.
MIkey was only here for two seasons, not three. And yeah, his profile looks too much like mine. Constipation has nothing to do with it, although many feel that I'm full of it.....1726512970140.gif
 
I remain steadfast that a top D1 QB athlete should be able to run the ball when needed. No excuses. Does he fumble? Correct it. Does he lack confidence? Get our sports psychologist in to help. Does he need skills training?? Maybe he needs to have his QB1 status challenged. Maalik needs to run outside his comfort zone. Really, this is frustrating and even embarrassing.

Also, as CB&B noted, there are times when Maalik throws to wide open, Wyoming-like open spaces. What's with that? I haven't seen a QB for a while whose delta between laser like dimes and moonshots [I know, I'm changing metaphors here] is so great.

While it seems there has been more of a trend in recent years towards dual threat QBs, a QB absolutely does not need to be a run threat for your offense to be successful, and some QBs simply aren't good runners and should live and die in the pocket throwing the football. Whether we like it or not, it seems like Maalik is just such a QB—he's a pocket passer, not a dual threat guy who can easily tuck and run.

Also, while I agree that running the ball can probably be taught to an extent so that the individual improves in that department, doing so requires that you take focus away from refining other techniques (and also creates the possibility that the QB becomes even more uncertain in live game-day situations—When should I stay in the pocket? When should I tuck it and run?). Given a pure pocket passing QB, I'd be far less inclined to waste the effort trying to teach him how to run the football and more inclined to use that time and energy to refine his passing skills and work on improving the communication between him and his receivers. Placing my focus there will prevent those throws to 'wide-open, Wyoming-like spaces' because receivers and QB will be more likely to be on the same page regarding passing routes, timing, and ball placement.

As someone else stated upthread, our offense thus far has suffered somewhat from not having quite the right guys at the skill positions to take advantage of the fact that Maalik is more of a pro-style pocket passer. We need more speed on the edge, we need a stronger RB room, and we need a better offensive line. Maalik had all of these things at Texas, and posted two 100+ QBR victories in his two starts there. So he's demonstrated that when surrounded with the right talent, he's a really good QB. The challenge for our coaching staff is twofold:
  1. Long term, recruit the right talent to populate the offense around Maalik so he can shine in the coming couple of seasons, and [in the meantime]
  2. Build up an offensive playbook and weekly game-plans that effectively emphasizes the strengths of the guys we currently have available while minimizing their weaknesses as much as possible
We have seen thus far that the OL has shown improvement in their run blocking (they slightly regressed in pass blocking against UConn, but sometimes that will happen when you emphasize run blocking in practice to improve in that area—you have to take the bad with the good), which led to improved rushing from our RBs. We still need to see more improvement in communication and timing between Maalik and his receivers, more improvement from the receiving corps in blocking on short routes, and more improvement in blitz pickup and correctly reading and following blocks by the RBs (this will naturally improve when Jaquez is back in the lineup). I'm hopeful that we continue to improve in these areas offensively so that we can move the ball more consistently to give our D the ability to catch their breath in-game, because I really think our D is good enough to keep us close in pretty much every game we play.
 
While it seems there has been more of a trend in recent years towards dual threat QBs, a QB absolutely does not need to be a run threat for your offense to be successful, and some QBs simply aren't good runners and should live and die in the pocket throwing the football. Whether we like it or not, it seems like Maalik is just such a QB—he's a pocket passer, not a dual threat guy who can easily tuck and run.

Also, while I agree that running the ball can probably be taught to an extent so that the individual improves in that department, doing so requires that you take focus away from refining other techniques (and also creates the possibility that the QB becomes even more uncertain in live game-day situations—When should I stay in the pocket? When should I tuck it and run?). Given a pure pocket passing QB, I'd be far less inclined to waste the effort trying to teach him how to run the football and more inclined to use that time and energy to refine his passing skills and work on improving the communication between him and his receivers. Placing my focus there will prevent those throws to 'wide-open, Wyoming-like spaces' because receivers and QB will be more likely to be on the same page regarding passing routes, timing, and ball placement.

As someone else stated upthread, our offense thus far has suffered somewhat from not having quite the right guys at the skill positions to take advantage of the fact that Maalik is more of a pro-style pocket passer. We need more speed on the edge, we need a stronger RB room, and we need a better offensive line. Maalik had all of these things at Texas, and posted two 100+ QBR victories in his two starts there. So he's demonstrated that when surrounded with the right talent, he's a really good QB. The challenge for our coaching staff is twofold:
  1. Long term, recruit the right talent to populate the offense around Maalik so he can shine in the coming couple of seasons, and [in the meantime]
  2. Build up an offensive playbook and weekly game-plans that effectively emphasizes the strengths of the guys we currently have available while minimizing their weaknesses as much as possible
We have seen thus far that the OL has shown improvement in their run blocking (they slightly regressed in pass blocking against UConn, but sometimes that will happen when you emphasize run blocking in practice to improve in that area—you have to take the bad with the good), which led to improved rushing from our RBs. We still need to see more improvement in communication and timing between Maalik and his receivers, more improvement from the receiving corps in blocking on short routes, and more improvement in blitz pickup and correctly reading and following blocks by the RBs (this will naturally improve when Jaquez is back in the lineup). I'm hopeful that we continue to improve in these areas offensively so that we can move the ball more consistently to give our D the ability to catch their breath in-game, because I really think our D is good enough to keep us close in pretty much every game we play.
The vast majority of successful pocket passing quarterbacks will run when they see a good opportunity. A QB who never runs is pretty unusual. To be successful, such a QB needs a very good OL. Good skill players to distribute the ball to are also important, but not nearly as important as the OL. Any offense that tries to be successful with a pocket QB without a very good OL will fail, especially if that QB really can't run at all. Unless our OL somehow improves, Murphy is going to struggle badly in ACC play. But if it somehow improves quite a bit, he'll be okay even if he never runs.
 
The vast majority of successful pocket passing quarterbacks will run when they see a good opportunity. A QB who never runs is pretty unusual. To be successful, such a QB needs a very good OL. Good skill players to distribute the ball to are also important, but not nearly as important as the OL. Any offense that tries to be successful with a pocket QB without a very good OL will fail, especially if that QB really can't run at all. Unless our OL somehow improves, Murphy is going to struggle badly in ACC play. But if it somehow improves quite a bit, he'll be okay even if he never runs.
Hey, maybe Murphy is the next Dan Marino
 
Back
Top