FB: Duke 26, UConn 21

Two good things happened on Thomas last run where he slid down at the 4 yard line. That allowed Duke to run out the clock with the V-formation... essentially no risk. He prevented himself from being viciously tackled and possibly fumbling.
He/Diaz also earned the praise of UConn's coach. Recognizing UConn doesn't have the talent to win a bunch of games and he has to say something nice, it was still nice to hear. I would have equally frustrated with a 33-21 score given the start.

Jim Mora, Jr. link: https://goduke.com/documents/2024/9/14/UConn_Quotes.pdf
 
Also… the possibility that Duke scores… 33-21… then uconn scores and then a 2 point conversion… final score 33-29. Probably even more frustrating. Stranger things happen.
 
Part of me wonders that in the age of analytics and where winning margin matters, whether the calculus has changed and scoring that touchdown (and introducing the 0.1% chance that UConn can drive the field, TD, onside kick, and TD again) is outweighed by the benefit of beating them by a margin much closer to Vegas's expectation.
I hear what you’re saying but, when a single play can knock out a star defender etc, why even let all those extra plays happen.
 
Without a real RPO threat or really any threat of QB to run, we don't have the number of tools needed to win against good competition.
Not sure if the OC doesn't want to use QB run threat, Murphy doesn't want to, or Diaz doesn't want to.
Murphy doesn't need to be Mike Vick. But we need to make defenses respect the QB run threat.
 
Well, we won. Those of us who remember the bad old days will celebrate every win we can get. But man, that was close to catastrophe.

The Good:

- We started really well. 17-0 out of the gate and it looked like we were headed for another 41-7 kind of game. Perhaps, if not for that really unlucky pick six, things would look rosier.

- We found at least the first signs of a running game. 142 on the ground might be enough with our pass heavy offense, though 3.6 ypc isn't anything to get excited about. Nice work from Star Thomas, who finally had some room to run.

- Despite the 3rd quarter, we were the better team. The SP+ win expectancy was 93%. We survived a crazy fluke turnover and some adversity in the 3rd quarter. Maalik has now led two fourth quarter comebacks as a Blue Devil. For all his inconsistency, he does not seem to lack for confidence late in games. 6

- Have a day, Que'sean Brown! 11 catches for 87 yards including the game winner and a huge 3rd down catch late. I really like this kid's game. Duke never seems to be able to get big physical receivers, but we have had good luck with small shifty ones. Perhaps most importantly, those jet sweep passes around the edge are a nice way to stretch defenses when we aren't running the ball well.

- Special teams were great. The Toddfather knocked in two long ones, and our young punter has been really good. Brown had a nice punt return or two as well.

- The WRs had a bounce back day after all the drops last week. I'm not sure we dropped anything yesterday. Special shout out to Nicky Dalmolin, who was a forgotten man most of the day, but caught his only target and made a nice move to pick up a key 3rd down.



The Bad:

- We were dreadful out of halftime. What on earth happened? We had time to regroup after the pick six, got the opening kickoff, and had the chance to set the tone. On both sides of the ball we were bad in the 3rd quarter.

- I have to say, I'm not all that impressed with our offensive schemes. We don't seem to fool anybody. Our running game is vanilla and if a play isn't well blocked, it just goes nowhere. I am completely flabbergasted at our complete refusal to use the QB in the running game. I know it's not Maalik's strength. But it feels like we're playing 10 on 11 in our running game. The passing game shows promise: Maalik throws a pretty good deep ball and has the arm strength to zip balls in, which is nice. But it feels like we are so dependent on his accuracy to move the ball.

- This team hasn't been good at getting the "tough yards" on offense. It's a huge contrast to the last two years, where we were so good in short yardage. It seemed like with Riley back there, he could always create a few yards when we really needed it. Having a great running QB and two NFL draft pick OL make a big difference, it turns out. This year's offense can't power run and hasn't shown any "ad-lib" ability at all. And all the failed deep balls on third and short... yikes.

- The defensive front had a tough game. After 8 sacks in game one, we've had just one sack in the last two games. UConn ran the ball well on us. They outrushed us 4.8 ypc to 3.6, which is not an acceptable number against a far inferior opponent.



The Statistical:

- All TDs count the same, but I'm fascinated that we are scoring so many through the air this year. Under Cut and Elko, we ran for way more scores than we passed (under Cut, it felt like half our TDs were QB runs from inside the 5). In 2023, we ran for 26 TDs and passed for 14. In 2022, we ran for 31 and passed for 20. In 2021 we passed for 9 and ran for 21. This year, we have 8 passing TDs and just 1 on the ground.

- Speaking of TD's through the air, Eli Pancol has 4 of them through 3 games. In Duke history, only 3 players have had at least 10 in a season (Clarkston Hines x3, Chris Castor, Cedric Jones). 6 more TDs in the next 9/10 games seems at least possible.

- When was the last time we won a football game without a rushing TD? Okay, it was last week. But before that? I'm thinking it was a 9-7 win over BC in 2015. I can't imagine it's happened many times in recent memory, and now it's happened in back to back weeks.

- Are we destined to score 26 every game?



The Realistic:

- Last night's effort simply would not have been good enough to win in the ACC. We get one more tune up and then the road gets much tougher. My expectation is that we should beat MTSU, but it may be a big challenge to win two in ACC play to get to 6 wins. There's still time to improve and for more twists in the tale, of course.

- One good thing is that our schedule looks easier than expected. FSU, NC State, VT, UNC, and SMU have all looked worse than expected. While some of the upstarts in the ACC (Cal, Pitt, BC) aren't on the schedule.
 
Well, we won. Those of us who remember the bad old days will celebrate every win we can get. But man, that was close to catastrophe.

The Good:

- We started really well. 17-0 out of the gate and it looked like we were headed for another 41-7 kind of game. Perhaps, if not for that really unlucky pick six, things would look rosier.

- We found at least the first signs of a running game. 142 on the ground might be enough with our pass heavy offense, though 3.6 ypc isn't anything to get excited about. Nice work from Star Thomas, who finally had some room to run.

- Despite the 3rd quarter, we were the better team. The SP+ win expectancy was 93%. We survived a crazy fluke turnover and some adversity in the 3rd quarter. Maalik has now led two fourth quarter comebacks as a Blue Devil. For all his inconsistency, he does not seem to lack for confidence late in games. 6

- Have a day, Que'sean Brown! 11 catches for 87 yards including the game winner and a huge 3rd down catch late. I really like this kid's game. Duke never seems to be able to get big physical receivers, but we have had good luck with small shifty ones. Perhaps most importantly, those jet sweep passes around the edge are a nice way to stretch defenses when we aren't running the ball well.

- Special teams were great. The Toddfather knocked in two long ones, and our young punter has been really good. Brown had a nice punt return or two as well.

- The WRs had a bounce back day after all the drops last week. I'm not sure we dropped anything yesterday. Special shout out to Nicky Dalmolin, who was a forgotten man most of the day, but caught his only target and made a nice move to pick up a key 3rd down.



The Bad:

- We were dreadful out of halftime. What on earth happened? We had time to regroup after the pick six, got the opening kickoff, and had the chance to set the tone. On both sides of the ball we were bad in the 3rd quarter.

- I have to say, I'm not all that impressed with our offensive schemes. We don't seem to fool anybody. Our running game is vanilla and if a play isn't well blocked, it just goes nowhere. I am completely flabbergasted at our complete refusal to use the QB in the running game. I know it's not Maalik's strength. But it feels like we're playing 10 on 11 in our running game. The passing game shows promise: Maalik throws a pretty good deep ball and has the arm strength to zip balls in, which is nice. But it feels like we are so dependent on his accuracy to move the ball.

- This team hasn't been good at getting the "tough yards" on offense. It's a huge contrast to the last two years, where we were so good in short yardage. It seemed like with Riley back there, he could always create a few yards when we really needed it. Having a great running QB and two NFL draft pick OL make a big difference, it turns out. This year's offense can't power run and hasn't shown any "ad-lib" ability at all. And all the failed deep balls on third and short... yikes.

- The defensive front had a tough game. After 8 sacks in game one, we've had just one sack in the last two games. UConn ran the ball well on us. They outrushed us 4.8 ypc to 3.6, which is not an acceptable number against a far inferior opponent.



The Statistical:

- All TDs count the same, but I'm fascinated that we are scoring so many through the air this year. Under Cut and Elko, we ran for way more scores than we passed (under Cut, it felt like half our TDs were QB runs from inside the 5). In 2023, we ran for 26 TDs and passed for 14. In 2022, we ran for 31 and passed for 20. In 2021 we passed for 9 and ran for 21. This year, we have 8 passing TDs and just 1 on the ground.

- Speaking of TD's through the air, Eli Pancol has 4 of them through 3 games. In Duke history, only 3 players have had at least 10 in a season (Clarkston Hines x3, Chris Castor, Cedric Jones). 6 more TDs in the next 9/10 games seems at least possible.

- When was the last time we won a football game without a rushing TD? Okay, it was last week. But before that? I'm thinking it was a 9-7 win over BC in 2015. I can't imagine it's happened many times in recent memory, and now it's happened in back to back weeks.

- Are we destined to score 26 every game?



The Realistic:

- Last night's effort simply would not have been good enough to win in the ACC. We get one more tune up and then the road gets much tougher. My expectation is that we should beat MTSU, but it may be a big challenge to win two in ACC play to get to 6 wins. There's still time to improve and for more twists in the tale, of course.

- One good thing is that our schedule looks easier than expected. FSU, NC State, VT, UNC, and SMU have all looked worse than expected. While some of the upstarts in the ACC (Cal, Pitt, BC) aren't on the schedule.
Great summary. I will also add we threw very deep on 3rd and 1 and 3rd and 4 (I think) in the 2nd half. I could understand that strategy if we intended to go for it on 4th down. But we didn’t and possible drives ended.

I like that we throw deep often, just think we should be smarter on the timing.
 
Great summary. I will also add we threw very deep on 3rd and 1 and 3rd and 4 (I think) in the 2nd half. I could understand that strategy if we intended to go for it on 4th down. But we didn’t and possible drives ended.

I like that we throw deep often, just think we should be smarter on the timing.
Yeah, agree. On the 3rd and 1, I thought we had earned a 1st down on the previous play, but then was shocked to see it was indeed 3rd down and we were throwing long.

My .02 on the long ball for this team -- we are really close to having an effective, more consistent weapon. Maalik throws an accurate, catchable long pass that is just missing by inches, mostly a little long, but also some where the WR could have made the catch. I don't know if Jordan Moore has pro aspirations, but he could help his chances considerably by closing on the ball better and making some finger tip catches. And same for other WRs.
 
Yeah, agree. On the 3rd and 1, I thought we had earned a 1st down on the previous play, but then was shocked to see it was indeed 3rd down and we were throwing long.
Mark Newton and myself were complaining about the spot at the game. It appeared to be a horrible spot but our old eyes were a long ways from the action.

As big as Murphy is we should be able to execute a QB sneak in that situation.
 
Great summary. I will also add we threw very deep on 3rd and 1 and 3rd and 4 (I think) in the 2nd half. I could understand that strategy if we intended to go for it on 4th down. But we didn’t and possible drives ended.

I like that we throw deep often, just think we should be smarter on the timing.
ya, that was bewildering and did not seem like good decision making at all.
 
Hey, I'm fine with the fact that Nina and Company are trying a lot of new things...Rachel Demita, the DJ thing, not particularly my cups of tea, but I give them credit for trying stuff...one good ramification though is Shouting Scoreboard Man speaks less now; on the slightly down side the band's been relegated to secondary status....lot of other stuff going on when they used to get to play...I fine with that, too, but if you're in the band hauling heavy instruments around I imagine you'd want to play more...
 
Yeah, agree. On the 3rd and 1, I thought we had earned a 1st down on the previous play, but then was shocked to see it was indeed 3rd down and we were throwing long.

My .02 on the long ball for this team -- we are really close to having an effective, more consistent weapon. Maalik throws an accurate, catchable long pass that is just missing by inches, mostly a little long, but also some where the WR could have made the catch. I don't know if Jordan Moore has pro aspirations, but he could help his chances considerably by closing on the ball better and making some finger tip catches. And same for other WRs.

I question the accurate part. There were too many times yesterday when he was not close, that may be partly on the receiver? It happens too often
 
there appeared to be several times where Murphy and the receiver were not on the same page at all. Growing pains.
I blame that far more on Maalik. While rewatching last night, there were two stand out plays. He throws to NOBODY. Ok, fine, if you don't see your guy where he's supposed to be, then adjust, but don't launch the ball to flat out empty space and expect anything good to happen.

I know they practice routes, but if something is amiss, you still have your eyes guiding you. If your target isn't where you expect him to be, then why are you still throwing the ball to that spot?
 
As big as Murphy is we should be able to execute a QB sneak in that situation.
I definitely agree with this, Bob. Maalik is a pretty big, solid guy. I would hope that he could occasionally get us a 1st down in very short yard situations via the ol' sneakaroonie at least. However, maybe he's been prone to fumbling practicing this, and he and the staff don't have much confidence in the play, who knows? But whatever the case, I would love to see what he can do in such scenarios.
 
I definitely agree with this, Bob. Maalik is a pretty big, solid guy. I would hope that he could occasionally get us a 1st down in very short yard situations via the ol' sneakaroonie at least. However, maybe he's been prone to fumbling practicing this, and he and the staff don't have much confidence in the play, who knows? But whatever the case, I would love to see what he can do in such scenarios.
Maybe Belin can come in to do this... or even Loftis. Some might say that this telegraphs the play, but bunching up for a QB sneak does the same thing. And we did have the Connette play :cool: and I bet everyone in the stadium knew what was coming...
 
Maybe Belin can come in to do this... or even Loftis. Some might say that this telegraphs the play, but bunching up for a QB sneak does the same thing. And we did have the Connette play :cool: and I bet everyone in the stadium knew what was coming...
The only other time that everyone knew what the play was going to be was when Zack Asack took the field. (Of course he'd be out there for a whole series and that was the call for every single snap.)
 
Back
Top