Wait, that’s ambiguous. Do you like making American girls disappointed or do you like American girls that are disappointing?I like disappointing American girls.
Wait, that’s ambiguous. Do you like making American girls disappointed or do you like American girls that are disappointing?I like disappointing American girls.
I mean, they are not concerned about it because the party they support is the one that is trying to subvert democracy. As far as they are concerned, the "good guys" (to them) are going to seize power, hold onto it, and enact the policies it wants outside the normal give-and-take of our governing tradition. Why should Republicans be upset about holding onto power and getting to do whatever they want?As it relates to the threat to democracy, I am as baffled as you are but polls consistently show that it is not a high priority issue for the broader electorate (generally 10% or less of voters) and that those who do prioritize it are split roughly equally along party lines, with Republicans citing “lawfare”, media censorship, etc.
I think you’re missing the bigger point, which is that polling indicates that ~90% of DEMOCRATS also don’t seem to think “threats to democracy” are a high priority issue in this election. And that is truly baffling.I mean, they are not concerned about it because the party they support is the one that is trying to subvert democracy. As far as they are concerned, the "good guys" (to them) are going to seize power, hold onto it, and enact the policies it wants outside the normal give-and-take of our governing tradition. Why should Republicans be upset about holding onto power and getting to do whatever they want?
If Democrats were doing that I'm pretty sure I would not be nearly as worked up about it** as I am right now, know what I mean?
**- To be clear, I would find it wrong and would vocally call out Democrats who were doing this, but it wouldn't feel like nearly as much of an existential threat.
You got that right!In Austin, the three-syllable pronunciation is “Gawd-dam Dawgs.”
To be fair, when I saw a supposed debunking of the 'man of the year' award, the article said that they actually gave him 'man of the decade,' instead.There has to be a picture of her in her McDonalds uniform. I'd wish someone would find it and release it so we could get past this stupid talking point. How is it that people complain about this McDonalds working record when Trump still claims that he won "Man of the Year" in Michigan despite it being debunked numerous times? I almost forgot, what about the "I won the election". It's like we live in a universe in which one person can lie about anything and people believe him and anything the other person says is thoroughly investigated.
I think they meant “man of the decadent”To be fair, when I saw a supposed debunking of the 'man of the year' award, the article said that they actually gave him 'man of the decade,' instead.
So while it was untrue he got man of the year, isn't man of the decade even better? Isn't a decade longer than a year? It would be like Kamala saying that Trump was right, she never worked at McDonald's, but she worked at Five Guys.
Fun fact... while I was text-posting this, by autocorrect changed man of the decade to man of the facade. You can't make this stuff up.
Well, I haven't kept count, but I believe that he has been crucified several times.Leaving this out there to add to the Christianity discussion.
To be fair, he claimed to have been called Michigan Man of the Year more than 10 years ago. He was named Man of the Decade last year by some minor county in Michigan. Big differenceTo be fair, when I saw a supposed debunking of the 'man of the year' award, the article said that they actually gave him 'man of the decade,' instead.
So while it was untrue he got man of the year, isn't man of the decade even better? Isn't a decade longer than a year? It would be like Kamala saying that Trump was right, she never worked at McDonald's, but she worked at Five Guys.
Fun fact... while I was text-posting this, by autocorrect changed man of the decade to man of the facade. You can't make this stuff up.
That's the 30% I dismissed. The other 18% aren't low information voters. They are the voters who know who he is but are choosing to look the other way. This 18% includes anyone with a college degree who is still voting for Trump with all that we know about him.Because Trump is killing it with the low info voter. They have no idea who the people are that you listed, not even Pence. And they don’t care. Stuff was cheaper when the orange guy was President. And they’ll show up thinking they are voting for that, above all else.
That's the 30% I dismissed. The other 18% aren't low information voters. They are the voters who know who he is but are choosing to look the other way. This 18% includes anyone with a college degree who is still voting for Trump with all that we know about him.
Don't know if you can prepare any better if the threat was a real "war"... Just amazing that this is necessary. So sad...
Given that nobody has ever done as much as he has for the Jews, he's now got two of the four major world religions.Leaving this out there to add to the Christianity discussion.
Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and...Rastafarianism?Given that nobody has ever done as much as he has for the Jews, he's now got two of the four major world religions.
Buddhists giggle at you.Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and...Rastafarianism?