CrazyNotCrazie
Member
I'm old fashioned. But I liked what I saw from the two remaining incumbents last year. I don't think we are in play for someone who is dramatically better than them. Or if we are, I would rather spend the money it would take to get such a player elsewhere. Reward loyalty. I know this concept is completely dead, but I think that's what we should do. If Arch Manning calls and says he will come for free, sure, take the call, but that's not happening. So reward loyalty.
Some people have commented on them not playing this year. Loftis played a lot last year. He knows what he is doing. We know what we are getting. We are not completely starting over. And he has now had a year practicing in Manny's system.
Seems like a no-brainer to me. But again, I'm still living in the dark ages.
And for full disclosure, last year I would have been just as happy if we had stuck with them and not taken Murphy. I am appreciative of what he has done for Duke this year. But I was OK with where we were. Perhaps that is an attitude that encourages mediocrity, but I am OK with it.
Some people have commented on them not playing this year. Loftis played a lot last year. He knows what he is doing. We know what we are getting. We are not completely starting over. And he has now had a year practicing in Manny's system.
Seems like a no-brainer to me. But again, I'm still living in the dark ages.
And for full disclosure, last year I would have been just as happy if we had stuck with them and not taken Murphy. I am appreciative of what he has done for Duke this year. But I was OK with where we were. Perhaps that is an attitude that encourages mediocrity, but I am OK with it.