To address a few points from above:
1. Duke’s NIL doesn’t mean our guys are not student athletes. They’re going to classes and graduating. I’m irritated that we’re condemning 85 guys because some are getting significant paychecks.
2. Tampering rules are vague and toothless. The NCAA is reeling from its own greedy ineptitude, so it seems that it’s okay to freely flirt as long as you don’t do it publicly/embarrassingly and don’t engage in (financial) intercourse; I know some marriages like that.
3. If I were writing the 2-year Mensah contract, I’d want to back-load the payment if I were Duke; if he’s as good as touted, I want him back for that year before he’s eligible for the draft.
4. The NIL money might come from some billionaire or selling lots of novelty t-shirts, but the money could come straight from Duke as part of a decision to do what it can to win the next musical chair conference realignment. We can’t win the SRO Big Ten Stadium sweepstakes, but we’re a unique national brand that could be appealing if the football team is nationally competitive.
5. Stanford’s football admissions are clearly the toughest among P5 schools, but they’ve been historically very successful. In the last decade, they’ve almost always out recruited Duke, and have had multiple years where they were ranked about #15 overall. Transfers haven’t been as good.
In the next decade, Duke will vastly out recruit everyone (or almost everyone) by combining NIL with shrewd talent evaluation and the reality that many excellent football players would love a Duke education.
6. Colorado yanked scholarships from hard-working players. That strikes me as unethical. Duke may have told some guys that they weren’t going to get as much NIL as they’d gotten last year, or told them about the recruitment of a competitor; that strikes me as reality. I don’t think Maalik could have beaten out Mensah, though that would have been a nice problem for Duke to have.
As for Grayson, he did manage games successfully for us last year, but he didn’t show me he could be a successful ACC qb. I don’t see the problem. We’re going to recruit a freshman qb every year, and I’m sure we’d try to get the best one possible. Hasn’t that always been the case?