2024-25 DWBB Season

The TV graphics had the same picture for starters Jackson and Richardson. That's pitiful.
Did you not read my Chronicle link yesterday? 😜

“It's really funny because me and Ash, we somehow end up with the same hairstyle, and somehow the coaches continue to get us mixed up,” Richardson said...
Jackson is only an inch taller than Richardson, making mix-ups of the two players far too easy for their coaches and teammates. Aside from looking similar, Richardson and Jackson have formed a relationship built on a sisterly kind of love...“A lot of people call us twins, but no, that's literally my best friend on and off the court,” Jackson said

Did not have Jordan Wood as high scorer on my bingo card. I know it's not ACC-level competition, but if she has made a big sophomore leap this is a very, very pleasant surprise. Especially since we lost Arianna, Jordan is the tallest player on the team. If we can get a good 15-20 minutes from her every game that makes us a different team.
 
Did not have Jordan Wood as high scorer on my bingo card. I know it's not ACC-level competition, but if she has made a big sophomore leap this is a very, very pleasant surprise. Especially since we lost Arianna, Jordan is the tallest player on the team. If we can get a good 15-20 minutes from her every game that makes us a different team.
I don't know that she'll get 23 minutes every game, but it looks like she's a regular rotation player now. She was the second sub of this game, and was used exclusively as Jadyn Donovan's replacement until Toby Fournier picked up her fourth foul, moving Wood over to cover the five. I don't expect every game will feature happy whistles, but even just as Jadyn's replacement, I expect her to pick up substantial run time.

Of course, the other half of that equation is that Toby appears to be the primary replacement at center for Delaney Thomas. So evidently Coach Kara expects her to get quite a bit of run, too. Unfortunately, she only lasted about 10 minutes today before picking up that fifth foul (and while I thought that fifth foul was bogus, the others were not). But I think Toby will learn how to stay on the floor with more experience and with the coaching she's getting. She has good potential, but just isn't quite there, yet. It will come.

BTW, Toby got a steal at mid-court today, and turned it into a breakaway. The anticipation was huge. Unfortunately, the defender caught up with her and got her just enough off her stride that she had to settle for a layup. The crowd groaned, then cheered. Everyone - and I mean, everyone - wanted to see a dunk there.
 
BTW, Toby got a steal at mid-court today, and turned it into a breakaway. The anticipation was huge. Unfortunately, the defender caught up with her and got her just enough off her stride that she had to settle for a layup. The crowd groaned, then cheered. Everyone - and I mean, everyone - wanted to see a dunk there.
Except 1 defender, unfortunately. :)
 
I don't know that she'll get 23 minutes every game, but it looks like she's a regular rotation player now. She was the second sub of this game, and was used exclusively as Jadyn Donovan's replacement until Toby Fournier picked up her fourth foul, moving Wood over to cover the five. I don't expect every game will feature happy whistles, but even just as Jadyn's replacement, I expect her to pick up substantial run time.

Of course, the other half of that equation is that Toby appears to be the primary replacement at center for Delaney Thomas. So evidently Coach Kara expects her to get quite a bit of run, too. Unfortunately, she only lasted about 10 minutes today before picking up that fifth foul (and while I thought that fifth foul was bogus, the others were not). But I think Toby will learn how to stay on the floor with more experience and with the coaching she's getting. She has good potential, but just isn't quite there, yet. It will come.

BTW, Toby got a steal at mid-court today, and turned it into a breakaway. The anticipation was huge. Unfortunately, the defender caught up with her and got her just enough off her stride that she had to settle for a layup. The crowd groaned, then cheered. Everyone - and I mean, everyone - wanted to see a dunk there.

Toby highlights.
 
This is going to be a fun team to watch. Have we ever had so much speed? Though I know the women's game overall has progressed so much in athleticism.

BTW, The Chronicle has their preview up.


Finally, it's the only Duke mention in the article, but Toby gets Creme's nod for national Freshman of the Year.

 
Last edited:
Thoughts on the game off the court at Cameron today. Crowd was fun (I mean school kids on a field trip always have fun.) The scoreboard was pretty cool. Individual stats in the lower corners are pretty small but at least they seemed to be updated quickly. Yay for the public address announcer! As usual you cannot hear much in CIS but at least you could hear that he was talking and most of the time we could hear who was being subbed and who was scoring. The DJ… time will tell.. the kids seemed to enjoy him. The band looked confused/frustrated as if to say “who’s turn is it this time?” Like when football went to PA entertainment, they will figure it out.
Oh and the game on the court- great start. It’s going to be an exciting year!
 
Duke 89, Radford 36 (recap, box score, highlights, condensed game, full replay, presser)

The Blue Devils (1-0) finished the game with six players in double figures, led by sophomore Jordan Wood's 13 points and eight rebounds – both career bests. Classmate Delaney Thomas and senior Reigan Richardson were next in line, chipping in 12 and 11 points, respectively.

Sophomores Jadyn Donovan and Oluchi Okananwa and freshman Toby Fournier rounded out the Blue Devils' quintet of double-digit scorers with 10 points each. Donovan paced Duke on the glass with nine boards, finishing with a near double-double.


 
I watched the game from home (oh the joys of being retired!). My thoughts:
  • The defense is still smothering. Even if an opposing team does well early on - as in the second quarter - they eventually wear down. Everyone on this team is fully committed to defending well.
  • The offense, to my wholly naive eyes, appears better than the last two years. More flowing and less clunky. It seemed they were taking good shots, but sometimes not falling. Still, Duke scored almost 90 points!
  • Jordan Wood! Just, wow. She can play. I was not expecting that at all. 13 points, 2 blocks (!), 2 steals, and 8 (!) rebounds. I loved the play at the end of the quarter (I think the second quarter?) where she threw the ball at the basket to draw the shooting free throws.
  • It was so great to see Vanessa back on the floor doing her usual - paying attention to details.
  • Toby Fournier will be really good (once she stops fouling).
  • So cool to see ten members of the team play meaningful minutes.
  • We still need someone who can reliably shoot threes, but maybe it was first-game excitement.
Finally, I wish that interest in DWBB warranted more discussion and separate threads for each game. I guess I could post a thread myself... as well as a WOTM poll.

-ramdevil
 
I enjoy watching the women's games and usually manage to attend a few with our grandsons when we're in Durham. In the past, I posted frequently here on in-game and regular threads about the women's team. Although I felt my observations were fairly balanced, I found that any criticism of a player or coach, however slight, elicited a sharp rebuke. Because the persistence of these negative reactions eventually made me feel that my impressions were not welcome, I substantially reduced my participation in the women's game threads and parsed my comments accordingly. While I can't offer any supporting evidence, I suspect that others have likewise been discouraged from posting in the women's game threads for the same reason. It hasn't dampened my enthusiasm for the women's team or diminished my interest in their games; but I do miss the fun of sharing my thoughts about the games with other fans in real time.

(FWIW, based on the first game, I think this team, with mostly the same players as last season, appears to be dramatically improved without the two less-athletically-gifted centers who anchored the middle for the past two years -- quicker up and down the floor, fewer turnovers due to lapses in fundamentals of passing and catching, and better ball movement, spacing, and shot selection. I'm excited and enthusiastic about their potential!)
 
I enjoy watching the women's games and usually manage to attend a few with our grandsons when we're in Durham. In the past, I posted frequently here on in-game and regular threads about the women's team. Although I felt my observations were fairly balanced, I found that any criticism of a player or coach, however slight, elicited a sharp rebuke. Because the persistence of these negative reactions eventually made me feel that my impressions were not welcome, I substantially reduced my participation in the women's game threads and parsed my comments accordingly. While I can't offer any supporting evidence, I suspect that others have likewise been discouraged from posting in the women's game threads for the same reason. It hasn't dampened my enthusiasm for the women's team or diminished my interest in their games; but I do miss the fun of sharing my thoughts about the games with other fans in real time.

(FWIW, based on the first game, I think this team, with mostly the same players as last season, appears to be dramatically improved without the two less-athletically-gifted centers who anchored the middle for the past two years -- quicker up and down the floor, fewer turnovers due to lapses in fundamentals of passing and catching, and better ball movement, spacing, and shot selection. I'm excited and enthusiastic about their potential!)
Well said.

GoDuke!
 
Stats v. Radford

Here are the numbers from yesterday's season opener against Radford University at Cameron:


OFFENSE
Possessions: 78.7 (blazing, especially compared to last season)
oRtg: 1.131 (I mean, pretty good, but not great against this caliber team)
eFG%: 45.7% (this is really not good in context)
3pt%: 20.0% (bad)
2pt%: 52.0% (good, but consider the opponent)
%three: 28.6% (OK if you make some of them)
FT rate: 50.0% (really good, but see below)
OR%: 43.9% (fantastic, but an opponent we out-sized at every position)
TO%: 14.0% (solid)
a/to: 1.091 (good, especially by last year's standards)
%assisted: 40.0% (OK)
fast break pts: 23 (25.8%) (really, really good)

DEFENSE
dRtg: 0.458 (excellent)
deFG%: 26.7% (excellent)
3pt%: 17.6% (excellent)
2pt%: 26.9% (excellent)
%threes: 39.5% (pretty high, but shows they couldn't do anything in close)
FT rate: 41.9% (really high, but see below)
DR%: 81.8% (excellent)
TO%: 43.2% (incredible)
a/to: 0.147 (outstanding)
%assisted: 50.0% (high, but experienced team that wasn't going to get anything 1-on-1)
stl%: 24.2% (excellent)
blk%: 23.1% (excellent, but against a team that was much smaller)
fast break pts: 1 (2.8%) (only one way to do better)


We did a lot of things well in this game, but honestly, the difference in talent levels here was just huge, and that pretty clearly affected game management*, so there are a limited number of things we can really learn from this game. By way of an example, the pace of the game was very high. But Duke had 19 steals and forced 34 turnovers and completely dominated the ball. Of the nine Radford players that played 15 or more minutes, five of them (more than half) had at least 4 TOs, and all but two who played at all had at least one. That automatically speeds up the game. So are we going to play fast this year? Obviously, we want to. But it's hard to say what will happen against a team we can't completely dominate.

*How was game management affected? Well, for one thing, the five starters each got 20-22.5 minutes of playing time, and no more. (OK, since someone's going to check, Delaney Thomas actually got 19:58. Whatever.) The foul rates on both teams in this game were very high. The refs were constantly blowing the whistle. They called 46 total fouls in this game (24 on Radford, if you must know). Having said that, not one of the starters committed more than 2 fouls. Yet, Toby Fournier was allowed to foul out and Jordan Wood accumulated three, while Delaney Thomas rode the pine with just one foul. Kara was obviously testing combos and trying to get our bench significant time against a real opponent. I posted some conclusions from some of that earlier in the thread, and those are probably some of the most significant takeaways from the game (not counting the 19 steals).

I agree that our offense looked very good, even though our shooting was pretty terrible. We hoisted 20 threes and only hit four of them, one each by Mair, Richardson, Okananwa, and Koabel. Our best shooter from last year (Jackson) went 0-4. But most of the looks were wide open. We just seemed to be rushing them. Same with some of the inside shots. We rushed a lot of layups against a team that was not intimidating inside. I mostly think that was just a bit of nerves, and some forcing. And on the flip side of that, we really took care of the ball. We only committed 11 total turnovers, including the 3 Radford steals. Given what a bugaboo that was for us last year, that's encouraging.

Our defense didn't look that great in person, honestly. We had a number of positioning mistakes, and there are still players rotating too slowly or missing assignments. Our steals were great, but some of them were gambles that wouldn't have paid off against a better team, and we sped them up to the point of breakdown, so they were just throwing the ball out of bounds at times. But even with that said, I'm probably being overly critical, because the on-paper results are universally excellent. The worst part of the defense was the free throw rate, and as I mentioned, I think that was more about the officials and the game management than about the team.

It's a solid start to the season, no matter how you look at it.
 
Duke WBB plays at Liberty on Thursday 11/7 at 7pm ET on ESPN+ (streaming link, listen, live stats)

Coaches will say things like "We'll play anyone, anywhere", but Kara Lawson actually means it. She's taking the #11 Blue Devils to the 4,000-seat Liberty Arena in Lynchburg, Virginia for a game Thursday night. This is the first of three road games this season against teams outside the power conferences; Duke also plays at South Dakota State on November 17 and at South Florida on December 21.

So who are the Liberty Flames? On a national level, they are currently ranked 120th by Bart Torvik. They were picked to finish 2nd in the Conference USA preseason poll, while three of their returners were named to the 10-player All-Conference Preseason Team: 6-6 redshirt senior center Bella Smuda, 6-0 senior guard Emma Hess, and 5-8 sophomore guard Asia Boone. In their season opener, a 77-58 neutral court win against Valparaiso (recap, box score), they were joined in the starting lineup by 5-6 senior guard Jordan Hodges and 6-2 sophomore forward Elisabeth Aegisdottir. The Flames attempted 20 threes in the game and made 13 of them, with Hess hitting 6-of-7.

Carey Green is in his 26th season as Liberty's head coach, and he has seen the program grow from the Big South to the Atlantic Sun to Conference USA. Last year his team finished 11-5 in their first season in the league, tied for 2nd place. (The 1st place team, Middle Tennessee State, upset Louisville in the NCAA Tournament first round.) Coach Green and Hess represented the team a couple of weeks ago for the C-USA Media Day:


When I previewed Duke's season opener against Radford, I pointed out that the Highlanders lacked a core of experienced returners, size, and outside shooting, which can each be dangerous qualities in a mid-major opponent. Liberty has all three. Four of the five Flames who started on Monday against Valpo also started all 34 games last season, while Aegisdottir was a reserve who averaged 22 minutes and played every game as well. The starting frontcourt of Hess-Aegisdottir-Smuda has impressive size -- Smuda alone is a double-double machine -- and the roster shows six reserves who are each listed at 6-0 or taller. Finally, Hess' strong showing on Monday was no fluke; she's a career 39 percent shooter from beyond the arc. The backcourt of Hodges and Boone also shot about 37 percent from three last season.

Liberty would have been an interesting challenge for Duke if this game were in Cameron, but it's not, which will make a win on Thursday that much harder. Liberty Arena is a fairly new building, having opened in December 2020, and it's probably a significant home court advantage for the school's basketball and volleyball teams. According to Liberty's game preview, the women's basketball team is 52-8 in this arena, including 1-0 against the ACC. Virginia Tech went to Lynchburg three years ago, with a team that included junior Elizabeth Kitley and sophomore Georgia Amoore, and lost by 19. (Smuda, Hess, and Hodges were Liberty reserves in that game.)

The path to a Duke victory, in theory, is pretty much what you'd expect: continue to smother the opponent on the defensive end, but limit turnovers and maintain a good shot selection on offense. A couple of stats work in Duke's favor here: according to Basketball Reference, last season's Liberty squad was about average (164th nationally) at committing turnovers, but were among the worst at forcing them; opponents averaged the 4th fewest turnovers against the Flames. They're pretty good at blocking shots (40th) but are in the bottom 10 for steals (353rd).
 
Last edited:
I hope I'll be home in time to tune in at the tip, but possibly not. I'm also bummed that this one overlaps with the soccer semi-final. I'm not sure what to watch. Hopefully this one is a Duke blowout in the first half so I can turn my attention to the game at Wake Med. But I think this will actually be a good test, especially for our front court. We're going to be out-sized in the paint for most of the season, and it starts with this game.
 
I hope I'll be home in time to tune in at the tip, but possibly not. I'm also bummed that this one overlaps with the soccer semi-final. I'm not sure what to watch. Hopefully this one is a Duke blowout in the first half so I can turn my attention to the game at Wake Med. But I think this will actually be a good test, especially for our front court. We're going to be out-sized in the paint for most of the season, and it starts with this game.
With internet streaming and multiple monitors I often watch several games simultaneously. Pick only one for sound, the others muted, but with closed caption. Then have DBR, live stats and twitter in additional windows. Needs a good video card and high speed internet. Happy days with so many Duke teams in the top 10!
 
Duke WBB plays at Liberty on Thursday 11/7 at 7pm ET on ESPN+ (streaming link, listen, live stats)

It's Game Day.

wbb20241107.jpg

Here are Duke's PDF game notes and Liberty's PDF game notes. Noah Frary (bio) and former Liberty assistant coach Kelley Deyo (profile) will be announcing the game on TV.

Remember, this game will air exclusively on ESPN+ (streaming link), which requires a subscription separate from your TV provider's ESPN package. If you wish to subscribe to ESPN+, you can do so here. Keep in mind that free trials are not available, as far as I know, and there are no other games on the Duke WBB schedule that would benefit from this additional purchase.

You can also follow the game for free -- listen to the Varsity Network (Blue Devil Sports Network) and monitor the live stats. As an alternative, LFSN (Liberty Flames Sports Network) is streaming audio here.
 
Last edited:
With internet streaming and multiple monitors I often watch several games simultaneously. Pick only one for sound, the others muted, but with closed caption. Then have DBR, live stats and twitter in additional windows. Needs a good video card and high speed internet. Happy days with so many Duke teams in the top 10!
This is my set up
 

Attachments

  • merlin_157155117_7758257f-7b85-4645-a12c-56a98972580c-superJumbo.jpg
    merlin_157155117_7758257f-7b85-4645-a12c-56a98972580c-superJumbo.jpg
    380.3 KB · Views: 18
Duke's a "longshot", but we're mentioned.

5 teams that could win the NCAA women's college basketball title this season (and 3 long shots)

Duke Blue Devils

Head coach Kara Lawson has the defense, but can the Blue Devils consistently find enough offense to help itself out? Duke lost eight of its 12 games last year by single digits, including a Sweet 16 loss to UConn after upsetting Ohio State. Improving from the 3-point line and limiting turnovers could propel them through the tournament.

Senior guard Reigan Richardson is one of four starters to return as well as Sixth Player of the Year, sophomore forward Oluchi Okananwa. Lawson signed No. 9 ranked recruit Toby Fournier, a 6-foot-2 forward from Canada who became a dunking sensation at 14 years old.
 
Back
Top