Originally Posted by
UNCfan
From an outsiders perspective, playing more players may have been the correct play to allow guys to heal and other guys to develop.
On the other hand, looking at the schedule and scores, you guys didn't blow anyone out. Your coach had to ride your best players to win those close games or you would've been a much lower seed in the tournament.
just my thoughts.
My take on the subject: in a world with higher roster turnover thatn previously, two things seem like a correcvt r5esponse:
(1) Recruit more players each year -- which we have done.
(2) Play a deeper rotation, so that the loss of OAD's and transfers is not so devastating.
I suppose the "play Harry more" move helps, in that, on an inexperienced team, it may be better to give more people playing time to increase the options on the the team. But Harry was always a OAD, so playing him more doesn't build a cadre of experienced players for the next season.
Sage Grouse
---------------------------------------
'When I got on the bus for my first road game at Duke, I saw that every player was carrying textbooks or laptops. I coached in the SEC for 25 years, and I had never seen that before, not even once.' - David Cutcliffe to Duke alumni in Washington, DC, June 2013