Yeah, true. Still it was ballsy to use the slinky. I never could get those things to go straight. Chessboard was innovative too.
Yeah, true. Still it was ballsy to use the slinky. I never could get those things to go straight. Chessboard was innovative too.
Bummer to go from Starter, to Danny Ferry (one of the first Duke players I can remember cheering for), to Starter so quickly.
With the LTE lagging a bit of late, I think it's time for us to remember the thread's heritage. In that spirit, I offer the following question:
Would you rather have a 10-inch tail or a duck that followed six feet behind you everywhere you went?
Neither of the above, I don't use GEICO or AFLAC for anything. GEICO is merely Progressive with better marketing(see their recent move into Boat and Motorcycle insurance)and worse pricing skills. AFLAC, well they are just great marketing, in products that are nearly impossible to price = lots o' profits.
Shoot, I was taking the easy way out. In that case, if I ever find myself in a situation, I would rather eat duck...
What type of duck? Cold duck? A mallard? Or one of those goofy white ducks with a yellow bill? If it was a very handsome mallard, then maybe the duck. Is a cormorant a duck? Those birds are awesome.
What is the angle of dangle of the tail? Does it stick out perpendicular to the spine, or is it parallel to spine? This matters a great deal for fashion. A tail that protrudes perpendicularly requires a hole in the pants (or skirt) and a hole in the undergarments. A parallel tail could be neatly tucked down along one leg.
I'm leaning toward the tail but really need a great deal more information.
viaduct?
vi not a goose?
just posting extra to stay ahead of Fish80 on the thread
The duck would be a "wild card" duck. It might be one of your handsome mallards, but it might be a white one. You won't find out until after you choose the duck.
As for the tail, it would stick straight out from the body, but it would also be of sufficient heft that it would hang down pretty quickly after that. It could be tucked, but with a perpendicular portion at its base...does that make sense? There would be a slight protuberance in your pants/skirt. Not overtly obvious, but definitely noticeable should one's eyes pass over it. It would also have light hair...much like on, say, your forearms (if your forearms are of the hairier variety, then your tail would be too).
So in sum, there would be definite drawbacks to both situation, but also, if you're twisted enough (*cough* EarlJam *cough*), a certain charm to each.