It already is. It was called correctly as roughing the passer. Unless you mean it should be a targeting type penalty with ejection? Or is it already if the refs think there was intent to harm? I believe that’s what it is in the NFL. I’m not very familiar with the ejection rules in college football.
I wasn't watching the game; just saw a replay and didn't see that a penalty was called. Thanks for this extra information.
Given how often quarterbacks end up with significant shoulder injuries from this type of play, it might not be a bad idea to treat it the way they treat targeting, although that might also open a can of worms.
Frost and Freeman sounds like a good law firm. Both need asbestos pants now. Saw ND fans invade O’Hare like lions Saturday and skulk out like lambs on Sunday
Frost is done—stick a fork in him.
As for Freeman—ND likely will have to ride this out for at least 3 years, unless he completely implodes the program and the broader [conference] sands shift more rapidly around them. I wouldn't write him off just yet though—it's only been 3 games.
ND's QB Buchner is now out for most of the season. Stinks for them but that might give Freeman a nice excuse if this turns out to be a real stinker.
https://www.espn.com/college-footbal...-miss-4-months
This hit was worthy of much more than a 15 yard penalty. Even ejection is an insufficient consequence. The hit resulted in tremendous pain and will have a 4-6 week recovery time, a big setback to the QB and the team's whole season. There should be a suspension option for illegal hits that result in significant physical damage resulting in not only loosing the player for a game but for several weeks. Saban at least should suspend the player instead of having no comments about the incident and saying only his team played poorly. What if a Texas player had done this to his Heisman candidate QB?