I wasn't going to jump back into this, but here I am. The evidence I provided in NO way supported your statement that Tre's shooting suffered after the injury. I haven't run a full statistical analysis, but given the sample sizes involved, Tre's shooting was virtually identical before and after the injury. It did not suffer at all. That evidence does not suggest you were right. Period.
Here's the thing about this one, does anybody remember Tre taking closely guarded shots before the injury? My recollection is he only took open shots, before and after. The fact that nobody guarded him beyond the three-point line is undoubtedly why he attempted almost twice as many threes per game after the injury than before. But unless someone can show me evidence that before the injury he took a significant percentage of closely guarded shots, I don't think the "they stopped guarding him" argument would have affected his success percentages in any significant way.
I don't recall what your point was, but Tre's two-point percentages were virtually identical before and after his injury.
I don't have these stats available now, but at some point mid-season I checked his two-point jumper percentage (which would probably include a fair percentage of floaters in the lane), and it was much worse than I thought it would be. Less than 30%, if I remember correctly, which I'm pretty sure I do.
My eyes also told me that Tre's defense was not quite as good post-injury. The problem is it's so difficult to assess how much that affected our team defense. It's clear our forced turnover percentage decreased, starting with that Syracuse game, and I'm sure some of that decrease was due to injuries, but when I say that I mean key defenders missing games. Tre missed three, Cam missed two, Zion missed six, Marques missed three. With all those missed games, it's really hard to pin the problem on Tre playing post-injury. Especially since our competition was so much better in the latter part of the season vs. the early season. And by the time the post-season rolled around and we had two major turnover clunkers (UNC in the ACCT and Mich St in the NCAAT), Tre had been back on the court for two months. So sure, maybe Tre not being fully healthy (assuming he wasn't mostly healthy) contributed to our lack of forced turnovers, but there's no reason to believe it was a major contributor, compared to other factors.