Originally Posted by
laxbluedevil
Forgot to mention White also extended Bob Davie's contract then fired him the next season, so he hired/rehired 4 bad football coaches at Notre Dame in 5 years. Is that an NCAA record? Seems that most people who wanted a proven AD wanted Wellman or Yow or someone similar. Who were the candidates that were interviewed?
Duke has won 3 of 14 mens basketball final fours, and 1 of 21 final fours in other team sports (mens soccer in 1986). And that doesn't count when Duke was #1 and didn't even make the final four like 98, 02, 06, in mens basketball, and 04, 05, 07 in womens basketball. Surely there must be others. So 10% winning percentage instead of 25-50% considering Duke is often #1 and not just top 4. Less than 5% for Duke coaches not named Krzyzewski.
It seems to me that isn't "good enough". Duke's prestige has gotten amazing players for the same reason as perennial #1 Stanford, heck even better without the tough admissions of Stanford. But then Duke often gets outcoached in the postseason. Womens golf has 4 national titles to equal all other sports combined because Duke's great golfers don't really need coaching or even heavy recruiting to flock to Duke and dominate. Former AD Butters hired some great coaches including all 3 that won national titles for Duke. Alleva hired some bad ones. I think Yow or Wellman would get winners that could win 25-50% of the final fours instead of 4-10%. Maryland has 17 national titles since Yow took over in the 90s, despite rarely having the best players.
Don't Duke's best players and best fans deserve great coaches and ADs, even the best? Duke athletics isn't acting like it wants to be #1 as they claim. White was the Alleva of ND and their fans seem pleased he left kind of like Mich St fans when McCallie left. How is that good enough?
I just think Duke can do better with Yow or Wellman or maybe the AD of SMU, Florida, Kansas, or Louisville. Duke is one of the top athletic programs and easiest to win at along with perennial #1 Stanford.