Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Watching carolina Go To HELL!
    Quote Originally Posted by watzone View Post
    Multiple offenses ... that would be different. Drunk driving, that would be different. But underage drinking -- well, I'm glad the drinking age was 21 when I was in college.
    .
    You mean 18, right? I thought us old schools fellas benefited from the law being under 18.
    I'm sure as heck glad the drinking age for beer and wine was 18 when I was in school (hard liquor was 21), and now that I'm not in the running for AD, I'm with FDA in believing it should be lowered, if not to 18 then 19 or 20. Drunk driving deaths are up again, not because of underage drinking (which does occur and the 21 age limit doesn't seem to inhibit kids indulging), but mostly because of illegal aliens driving drunk. Three more dead in one accident in Raleigh last month. But that's not pertinent to this conversation.

    Both our athletes are 20 and "blew" 0.3, well below the federally mandated age 21 limit of 0.8 for DWI/DUI. Under 21, the illegal limit for blood alcohol level is 0.1 (anything over 0.0). But these guys were walking on Franklin St., not driving, so I don't understand what the offense is, other drinking under age and/or carrying an open containers in chapel hill.

    If I were AD, my recommendation to Coach Cut on punishment would be for the entire team to run steps, a lot of steps, as group punishment so everyone on the team wouldn't want to repeat the stupidity of public drinking again. The players should also be counseled on the evils of drinking at all, just to make (at the risk of moving this to the PP board) all the "do gooders" happy (which I think is a waste of time).
    Ozzie, your paradigm of optimism!

    Go To Hell carolina, Go To Hell!
    9F 9F 9F
    https://ecogreen.greentechaffiliate.com

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by OZZIE4DUKE View Post

    Both our athletes are 20 and "blew" 0.3, well below the federally mandated age 21 limit of 0.8 for DWI/DUI. Under 21, the illegal limit for blood alcohol level is 0.1 (anything over 0.0).
    Isn't the federal DUI limit for highway funds 0.08%, not 0.8? I think you might be dead at 0.8%. Similarly, if our guys blew 0.3%, they'd be passed out drunk, or worse.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Watching carolina Go To HELL!
    Quote Originally Posted by cspan37421 View Post
    Isn't the federal DUI limit for highway funds 0.08%, not 0.8? I think you might be dead at 0.8%. Similarly, if our guys blew 0.3%, they'd be passed out drunk, or worse.
    Yes, you are right, 0.08 and 0.03. My typo, repeated several times.
    Ozzie, your paradigm of optimism!

    Go To Hell carolina, Go To Hell!
    9F 9F 9F
    https://ecogreen.greentechaffiliate.com

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Quote Originally Posted by davekay1971 View Post
    Heck, the drinking age was 21 when I was at Duke, and I spent most of my freshman year blasted. Sure, Coach K begged me repeatedly to come out for the team ("Hurley?!" Coach K said to me, "Hurley?! You think I can win a national championship with Hurley running the point? I need ya, Dave! Duke needs ya!"). But I turned him down so that I could continue to swill alcohol in a consequence-free environement.
    So it is your fault we didn't win three or four National Champioships in a row!
    Bob Green

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by OZZIE4DUKE View Post
    Yes, you are right, 0.08 and 0.03. My typo, repeated several times.
    I prosecute minors in possessions as part of my job (and may lightning not strike me for doing so). 0.03 is a beer. 0.3 is walking comatose.

    OK, so it's the offseason and they had a beer or two. If this is the biggest problem we have all year, it will be one hell of a year.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    stuck in NJ lol
    Quote Originally Posted by OldPhiKap View Post
    I prosecute minors in possessions as part of my job (and may lightning not strike me for doing so). 0.03 is a beer. 0.3 is walking comatose.

    OK, so it's the offseason and they had a beer or two. If this is the biggest problem we have all year, it will be one hell of a year.
    Totally agree this is very minor stuff. I think Cut might just make a statement with this and make them run bleachers or something like already stated here. Just to send a warning as prevention, so more serious issues don't come up. Better to nip it early before folks forget or think it's okay to bend rules.

  7. #27

    a win, win proposition, Ozzie alluded to

    Quote Originally Posted by OZZIE4DUKE View Post
    I'm sure as heck glad the drinking age for beer and wine was 18 when I was in school (hard liquor was 21), and now that I'm not in the running for AD, I'm with FDA in believing it should be lowered, if not to 18 then 19 or 20. Drunk driving deaths are up again, not because of underage drinking (which does occur and the 21 age limit doesn't seem to inhibit kids indulging), but mostly because of illegal aliens driving drunk. Three more dead in one accident in Raleigh last month. But that's not pertinent to this conversation.

    Both our athletes are 20 and "blew" 0.3, well below the federally mandated age 21 limit of 0.8 for DWI/DUI. Under 21, the illegal limit for blood alcohol level is 0.1 (anything over 0.0). But these guys were walking on Franklin St., not driving, so I don't understand what the offense is, other drinking under age and/or carrying an open containers in chapel hill.

    If I were AD, my recommendation to Coach Cut on punishment would be for the entire team to run steps, a lot of steps, as group punishment so everyone on the team wouldn't want to repeat the stupidity of public drinking again. The players should also be counseled on the evils of drinking at all, just to make (at the risk of moving this to the PP board) all the "do gooders" happy (which I think is a waste of time).
    background - politicos talk about doing more for our troops, for kids reaching the age of 18, who are old enough to enlist in the military and vote.

    In the context of supporting the troops, and pointing out the irony that 18 years olds may die for their country but cannot buy a drink, congress may pass an amendment to whatever highway act to de-link the availability of federal matching highway funds for states with the requirement that they maintain an 21 year old drinking age.

    To combat the notion that 18 means 16 (I bought alcohol when 16, when the drinking age was 21 where I grew up - never lowered to 18), install a national tamper proof high tech id for all who reside legally in the US. Have homeland security handle this. It will help with the enforcement of labor and immigration laws, and help prevent underaged drinking.

    as part fo the amendment to de-link, require all states to establish .08 as the BAC threshold for drunk driving (if it is not already so). I can drink beer all night and blow a .05 (did it twice), so .08 is not too onerous, particularly for beer drinkers who have carried forward in life some of the training, ability to handle beer, that a Duke (with keg parties) education give you.

    I think the problem with TL and Wright was that they were carrying with them alcoholic drinks (in hand). Open container laws / ordinances probably do not change even with a lowered drinking age.

    Punishment - we lost Delle Donne to another school after being pulled over and blowing a .03 and after Roof suspended him for a game. Seems to me that a game suspension is too much, not knowing what Goldberg did to get suspended, but Goldberg wont miss a game next season.

Similar Threads

  1. Test your reaction time...
    By BlueDevilJay in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-13-2008, 02:50 PM
  2. Please help test the new Snrubchat
    By Deslok in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-09-2007, 01:45 PM
  3. Seinfeld Test (another time waster!)
    By knights68 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-20-2007, 09:42 AM
  4. This is a test.
    By DBRTech in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-26-2007, 04:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •