While I don't understand how K comes in fifth place, well behind Roy, I don't have a problem with Greenberg's win. While there are a host of ways to look at the coaching award, one legitimate way is to ask the question "who achievest the best results with the least talent." From that perspective, Greenberg is a solid and respectable choice, regardless of the relative quality of his team's conference schedule. Of course, if that was the only criteria ever applied, guys like K and Roy would never win, which seems wrong, though semi-understandable on a year-year basis. In any event, I can respect the Greenberg decision.
"Just like you man. I got the shotgun, you got the briefcase." Omar Little