Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1

    We do have a fan in ESPN--Heather Dinich

    Another headline Duke story by Dinich. Very nice.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/columns/story?id=3218060

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia
    Very nice (her termination notice just left the printer at ESPN headquarters).

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by wisteria View Post
    Another headline Duke story by Dinich. Very nice.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/columns/story?id=3218060
    And Heather writes coherent sentences. What a joy.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Atlanta, GA

    More love from Bristol

    Along with CBS Sportsline's Gary Parrish, ESPN's Joe Lunardi now has us projected as a #1 seed:

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bracketology

    I still haven't come all the way around to believing that this team will be a 1, but I'm starting to believe that it's at least distinctly possible. A 2, in my mind, is very reasonable.
    Lunardi has only 4 ACC teams in his projected field: Us, kuralonna, Climpsun, and Miami. BC and FSU both listed among the last teams to miss the field.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Durham
    The way we're playing right now, I don't think Lunardi had much of a choice. It is worth noting that Lunardi has said since November that he would not be surprised if Duke ended up as a 1 seed.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Central Arkansas
    Because a bracketology in late January is exactly what'll happen (ha!) a few thoughts about Lunardi's latest work:

    The light (awful) blue crowd down 15-501/751 will be frothing at the mouth that Joe has them going out west and Duke in Raleigh/Charlotte.

    I'm so glad we're matched up with Tennessee as the #2 seed in our region. I'd rather face them than UCLA. (Again, as if this is really what'll happen, AND as if you can project 4 games into the tournament). Actually, even the 8/9 teams we're paired with don't scare me the way they usually do.

    Frankly the best part of us being a projected #1 seed is that now I can look at what Lunardi has to say about us without being an espn insider.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Quote Originally Posted by wilson View Post
    We want Wagner.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by dukerev View Post
    The light (awful) blue crowd down 15-501/751 will be frothing at the mouth that Joe has them going out west and Duke in Raleigh/Charlotte.
    Technically UNC is in the west regional, but because of the pod system, they are slated (along with Duke) to play the first two round in Raleigh. You think that would be a tough ticket?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Central Arkansas

    Talking

    Yeah, I see where they'd be in the Raleigh pod. But they'll be upset about going out west for the regionals where we'd be in Charlotte. Again, this is all exceedingly speculative, but I'd bet that there are Heels who are unhappy about Joe Lunardi today precisely because of that.

    As an aside, assuming that Duke and UNC both do play in the Raleigh pod, that is not necessarily a good thing for Duke. I remember years past where there were a lot of anti-Duke folks in the crowd and really got going during tourney games. Of course, this year's squad seems to have that "it" factor I keep hearing Bilas and others talk about that makes them respond positively in hostile environments.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by mbd1mbd1 View Post
    Technically UNC is in the west regional, but because of the pod system, they are slated (along with Duke) to play the first two round in Raleigh. You think that would be a tough ticket?
    Something similar happened a few years ago when both UNC and Duke were in different regions, but both played the first two rounds in Charlotte. For Duke, it might as well have been in the Dean Dome. I'd prefer DC (as long as Maryland isn't playing there as well), or possibly even Tampa or Birmingham, to sharing the RBC Center with the Heels and 15-16,000 of their fans.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom B. View Post
    Something similar happened a few years ago when both UNC and Duke were in different regions, but both played the first two rounds in Charlotte. For Duke, it might as well have been in the Dean Dome. I'd prefer DC (as long as Maryland isn't playing there as well), or possibly even Tampa or Birmingham, to sharing the RBC Center with the Heels and 15-16,000 of their fans.
    I'd prefer 2004, when unc got stuck out in some other time zone as a six-seed and we had Raleigh all to ourselves

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tampa
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom B. View Post
    I'd prefer DC (as long as Maryland isn't playing there as well), or possibly even Tampa or Birmingham, to sharing the RBC Center with the Heels and 15-16,000 of their fans.
    Tampa would be nice!

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom B. View Post
    Something similar happened a few years ago when both UNC and Duke were in different regions, but both played the first two rounds in Charlotte. For Duke, it might as well have been in the Dean Dome.
    It was that quiet?

  14. #14
    alteran is offline All-American, Honorable Mention
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Durham-- 2 miles from Cameron, baby!
    Quote Originally Posted by billybreen View Post
    It was that quiet?
    Oh no -- UNC fans get quite loud for us. Sometimes, they even dial the amps to 11.
    Last edited by alteran; 01-28-2008 at 04:02 PM. Reason: quiet <> quite-- oops

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by alteran View Post
    Oh no -- UNC fans get quite loud for us. Sometimes, they even dial the amps to 11.
    As long as we don't have to smell the glove . . .

  16. #16

    #1 Seed in current "Bracketology"

    Lunardi has us as a #1...

    in the east bracket starting in Raleigh and moving through Charlotte...how nice would that be?

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bracketology

  17. #17
    I'd be more pumped about being paired against Tennessee than where we play. Obviously this is not what the bracket will look like (or, if recent history is an indicator, not even close), but you'd have to like Duke's chances against a team like Tennessee. UCLA, G-Town, and Wash St would all be much tougher draws, due to their style of play. Tennessee would be looking to run and gun against a team that, in my view, is better than them at running and gunning. But this is too far down the road. If I were a betting man, I would still say Duke ends up a 2 seed, although I must admit they've been surprising me. If we were, the question would then be - who would you rather play out of the "top four" (i.e. Kansas, UNC, Memphis, or UCLA)?

Similar Threads

  1. Bristol
    By Channing in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-16-2008, 07:22 PM
  2. Love
    By EarlJam in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-12-2007, 09:23 AM
  3. What's Love Got to do With It?
    By EarlJam in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-28-2007, 06:40 PM
  4. How Will I Know When It's Love?
    By EarlJam in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-13-2007, 04:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •