
Originally Posted by
clinresga
Not sure I see what makes his decision dumb. Are you saying that he's somehow worse off now than if he'd stayed at Duke another year, as regards his NBA prospects?
It was never clear that Keels could be a full-time NBA player. That's still very much in question--he's played, what, two games with the Knicks? So how would having stayed another year at Duke made things better? The Keels we see today, barely holding onto a 10 day contract, is Keels after a year of doing nothing but playing basketball--competing with NBA-quality opponents over 50 games, getting NBA-level coaching and training. How in the world would another year at Duke, with fewer than 30 games against mostly mediocre (far short of NBA-grade) college players, while having to handle a full academic load, resulted in Keels playing better basketball than he is now? No way.
Keels after two years of college would be inevitably worse than Keels after a year in the G League. At best, he'd end up the same place, as a second round choice without a guaranteed contract. By leaving, he gave himself the best possible chance to maximize his basketball skills this year, though the final outcome remains TBD.
That's not dumb for Keels. He may have hurt our feelings as Duke fans, but why should he have jeopardized his career chances just to make us happier?