Originally Posted by
scottdude8
This is fascinating to me, and seems like a huge overreaction by UNC to losing GG last year. Yes, if Cadeau was dead-set on reclassing and UNC didn't have the PT for him, losing him would be a bad look in light of losing GG last year. But like Jason and UC, I just don't see the fit here at all, especially with how Hubert had admirably reshaped his roster via the transfer portal. The pieces he brought in fit, at least on paper, with the lead duo of Davis and Bacot. But Cadeau's fit alongside Davis is a huge question mark.
If Cadeau is OK being a sixth man or he plans on being in school two years this might make more sense... but I see no evidence that's the case. In fact, given the perceived weakness of the 2024 draft class, this decision seems to only make sense if he plans on being OAD, which means he plans on getting to showcase himself with major minutes.
This undoubtedly makes UNC more talented this upcoming season, and perhaps that's a good thing for the strength of the ACC. But it wouldn't surprise me if perhaps they start out fast, but as teams learn how to exploit a Davis/Cadeau combo defensively they tail off. All the scouting on Cadeau seems to emphasize that he's a pass-first guy with a decent shot that's never emphasized as a strength, so I'm not sure how he'll help with the floor spacing issues that plagued UNC last year.
Finally, one has to wonder how a guy like Seth Trimble feels about this. How is he going to get minutes this year now that Cadeau is on the roster?
Cadeau may make UNC better in the short term, but it could be the very short term (i.e., only part of the 2023-24 season), and makes their 2024 outlook much cloudier assuming he's OAD.
EDIT: Cadeau didn't just say the quiet part out loud in the ESPN article, he shouted it:
He maybe leaves he door slightly ajar for a two year Tar Heel career, but barely. I have zero problem with guys wanting and planning to be OAD, but one can't help but contrast this to Tyrese Proctor, for instance.