Yep, and as I stated in my post, I was using the term "convict" loosely but in accordance with generally recognized usages. Per Merriam-Webster,
Convict: to find or prove to be guilty. The word 'convict' is not solely and exclusively a legal term. If you need more examples, I can get them. They are readily available.
Are we having a discussion with wide-ranging viewpoints or are we attempting to score points on word usage in a debate?
Your original post on the lawsuit was to question whether the announcement of Trump's finances (undefined) would hurt his political future (presumed to be the 2024 campaign). I was not aware that you had already applied the damages and fine to a case not yet heard.
Heck, I haven't even had time to read it all - it's 222 pages long - much less decide it is a slam-dunk win for AG James.
I'm not sure what the reaction of the undecided middle will be. I could make a case either way, helping and hurting each party. However, that would be pure speculation, nearing fiction, were I to try.