Originally Posted by
JasonEvans
I'll go ahead and post it. He says he expects Roach, Keels, and Moore to all return. He later expands by saying:
https://twitter.com/devils_content/s...05507869794304
This is a twitter account with just 183 followers. Pretty much everyone who seems to have any real insight into the program has many hundreds of followers (I'm just under a thousand... this would be a good time for all of you to follow me:
https://twitter.com/JasonDukeEvans ). I looked through his timeline and though he has seemed confident about some recruiting matters, it does not feel like he is someone who has a lot of inside info or sources. Maybe, but it doesn't appear to be much more than just one of many Duke twitter accounts.
Frankly, most folks are projecting Roach and Keels to return at this point (Duke's portal activity, or lack thereof, clearly points toward this) so he is hardly going out on a limb to project that. His comment about Moore could be true, but runs somewhat counter to some other stuff I have heard lately.
Until these guys make some kind of announcement (or the NBA draft deadline passes without them entering their name) I would take a Tweet like that one as pretty sketchy.
Now, if Zion Olojede or one of the other apparently well connected accounts start talking about it, then we can start to get really excited.
For better or worse, social media acumen is important in all elements of life nowadays. As a scientist in academia, I was strongly encouraged to join Twitter soon after I began my postdoc because "Academic Twitter" is a big thing where people network, advertise their new results, promote jobs, etc. (FWIW, I'll shamelessly self promote my account like Jason, https://twitter.com/RichCompNeuro... since it's my "professional" account I rarely tweet basketball, but every once and a while I can't resist!). I've accumulated >1400 followers, which I'm pretty proud of in the small pond that is academia and neuroscience. Some things I've learned:
1) Follower count is a good indicator of whether you should pay attention, but not the be all and end all. If an account with ~100 followers posts something, it's likely someone's opinion and/or someone just trying to go viral with a weird take. But, followers do not equal reliability; a downside of social media is that the loudest voices, sometimes regardless of accuracy, can gather a following. So this is something of a necessary, but not sufficient, condition.
2) Be extra suspicious of low follower accounts whose profile pic is not of themselves. Again, not a hard and fast rule by any means, but indicative that someone is hiding behind anonymity.
3) Look at the account description, and see whether there are links... oftentimes this may be to a blog or another Twitter account that will give you more detail on who this account is.
4) Look at recent tweets when you aren't sure. For this account, scrolling down just a bit shows some rather inappropriate tweets that seem to just be meant to troll UNC fans. While we're all imperfect, that's something reputable journalistic sources aren't going to be doing, especially with NSFW language.
Social media is still a new frontier for many of us, so we have to be cautious as we approach it. It can be a great source of news... Zion Olojede has been an account I keep an eye on a lot, and would've have otherwise found without Twitter. But there's also a lot of people screaming into the void, hoping to get lucky, go viral, and make some easy cash. The critical thinking skills Duke taught us have never been more important than in this social media age.