Page 77 of 125 FirstFirst ... 2767757677787987 ... LastLast
Results 1,521 to 1,540 of 2490
  1. #1521
    I’m sure the next TV rights deal for the SEC and B1G will be very different than the ones they currently have. Although I don’t totally buy in to the idea most people think the cable model will be out in the near future. The B1G pushing their network onto anyone and everyone will no longer be the guaranteed cash cow of the past. It will be replaced by over the top subscription models that will require fans to fork over something like $10-$20 a month. A Super Conference needs to increase its audience mass to attract as many subscribers as it can. The old cable subscriber that never watched sports but still subsidized college sports won’t be around. That’s where adding a team like Clemson and FSU becomes valuable. They grow the pot in this new model for the SEC. For the B1G, they grow the pot now and later as would UNC, UVA and GTech. By creating a monopoly or duopoly Super conferences would also attract casual college football fans by creating the only place for marquee matchups. The SEC approved a temporary 8 game conference for the first year with Texas and Oklahoma. You can be sure that become nine games pretty soon and ten games if they expand further. The era of games against third tier teams will be all but over. The new system requires big names and big games all the time. We all talk about sharing the pie with more teams means less for everyone but I think we have seen max pie shares. I think in the future is was always going to be less pie (at least in the near term.) It’s going to be about maximizing your audience.

  2. #1522
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Quote Originally Posted by Kdogg View Post
    I’m sure the next TV rights deal for the SEC and B1G will be very different than the ones they currently have. Although I don’t totally buy in to the idea most people think the cable model will be out in the near future. The B1G pushing their network onto anyone and everyone will no longer be the guaranteed cash cow of the past. It will be replaced by over the top subscription models that will require fans to fork over something like $10-$20 a month. A Super Conference needs to increase its audience mass to attract as many subscribers as it can. The old cable subscriber that never watched sports but still subsidized college sports won’t be around. That’s where adding a team like Clemson and FSU becomes valuable. They grow the pot in this new model for the SEC. For the B1G, they grow the pot now and later as would UNC, UVA and GTech. By creating a monopoly or duopoly Super conferences would also attract casual college football fans by creating the only place for marquee matchups. The SEC approved a temporary 8 game conference for the first year with Texas and Oklahoma. You can be sure that become nine games pretty soon and ten games if they expand further. The era of games against third tier teams will be all but over. The new system requires big names and big games all the time. We all talk about sharing the pie with more teams means less for everyone but I think we have seen max pie shares. I think in the future is was always going to be less pie (at least in the near term.) It’s going to be about maximizing your audience.
    I pretty much agree, I just have no way of knowing whether the new subscriber model, should it come to pass, would provide more or less revenue than the current cable model...it sure does help revenue when a bunch of people who don't even care about sports pay for a channel they never watch...I do agree the pie is unlikely to get much bigger unless a conference or two manages to seize control of the playoffs and expands them...

  3. #1523
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New Bern, NC unless it's a home football game then I'm grilling on Devil's Alley
    So we've been vetted?

    According to longtime reporter Jim Williams, 10 programs have been "vetted" by the Big Ten for possible membership. This list includes, in no particular order, Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Washington, Georgia Tech, Virginia, North Carolina, Duke, Utah and Miami
    .
    https://www.si.com/college/ohiostate...s-dissovlement
    Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."

  4. #1524
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Bring us ALL in, then, and we can fight Northwestern for, maybe, 24th place. I'm sure there's room for all of us on the BigTen Network to watch bball games on January weekends. Woops, maybe not.

    Or maybe they can set up a relegation system like English soccer, so every year the bottom 3 teams get kicked down to, maybe the remains of the ACC or the Big East, and Villanova can move up for a while.

    I really hate all of this. But give me the BigTen I think before the SEC if it comes to that.

  5. #1525
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    hey, Northwestern has won the less difficult western division in recent years, even though they have had some bad seasons. I think getting into the Big 10 would be a tremendous coup for Duke...get us away from the delusional schools intent on wrecking the ACC. Duke could compete in the Big 10...the SEC is another and irrelevant story...

  6. #1526
    Not to be negative Nancy, but I think “vetted” and “proven economically viable” are wildly different things. I’m pretty sure we “vetted” 50k+ kids last year for undergrad and took less than 10%

  7. #1527
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hot'Lanta... home of the Falcons!
    Quote Originally Posted by RoseBowl1942 View Post
    Not to be negative Nancy, but I think “vetted” and “proven economically viable” are wildly different things. I’m pretty sure we “vetted” 50k+ kids last year for undergrad and took less than 10%
    True, but I would rather be in the "vetted" camp than to be where NC State and Wake are today.
    Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?

  8. #1528
    I wonder if this information was purposely leaked by the Big Ten, like in politics, to see what kind of response it got from the schools as well as the public.

  9. #1529
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    The People's Republic of Travis County
    Quote Originally Posted by Maged View Post
    I wonder if this information was purposely leaked by the Big Ten, like in politics, to see what kind of response it got from the schools as well as the public.
    Definitely.

  10. #1530
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Quote Originally Posted by JasonEvans View Post
    True, but I would rather be in the "vetted" camp than to be where NC State and Wake are today.
    Yep, and if the Big Ten "vetted" Duke, Ga Tech, and UVA, but not Clemson and FSU, perhaps the Big Ten is considered a particular way to differentiate themselves once major college sports is reduced to two superpower conferences. If the Big Ten wants to position themselves as the more academically minded of the two superpowers, Duke may have a slimmer of hope.

    Of course, the Big Ten would also need to see value in expanding well beyond 20 teams for Duke to make the cut.

  11. #1531
    Quote Originally Posted by CameronBornAndBred View Post
    What even does "vetted" mean? Anyone who follows sports and knows of academic selectivity and research standing could list those schools from top of mind without any investigation.

    Of course, the B10 isn't adding ten schools in one fell swoop or perhaps ever, and most if not all of those schools would lower per team payout, which we have been told is the Most Important Thing Ever.

    If things went kabluey, though, those ten would make a nice football (if we must keep playing it) and basketball conference, with regional conferences for non-revs: nice academics and research, all AAU, care enough about athletics without being CFP insane, and preserves some rivalries.

  12. #1532
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New Bern, NC unless it's a home football game then I'm grilling on Devil's Alley
    Quote Originally Posted by LeadingEdge View Post
    What even does "vetted" mean?
    In my mind, "vetted" means communication between the two parties (as well as parties associated with the target entity), beyond just reviewing what is publicly available.
    Last edited by CameronBornAndBred; 06-08-2023 at 10:23 AM.
    Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."

  13. #1533
    Quote Originally Posted by House P View Post
    If the Big Ten wants to position themselves as the more academically minded of the two superpowers, Duke may have a slimmer of hope.
    I suppose that "positioning themselves as the more academically minded" of the power conferences is a PR move to justify some perceived disappointment.

    But I could be wrong. Perhaps they truly value scholastic endeavors over football strength and $$$.

  14. #1534
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Quote Originally Posted by CameronBornAndBred View Post
    In my mind, "vetted" means communication between the two parties (as well as parties associated with the target entity), beyond just reviewing what is publicly available.
    yes, I take this as good news, even though it doesn't necessarily portend anything. I have zero inside knowledge, but would be stunned if Nina King hasn't been making some discrete inquiries in Big Ten Land. We find ourselves in a conference where literally half of it would be thrilled to leave us behind, so it's time to explore options. A bit surprising to hear that hoops may have SOME value in all this (fully recognizing TV football money is the center of the universe)...the troika of Duke, unc and UVA would have academic appeal to the Big 10, as would the other schools from out west...

  15. #1535
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.

    Well

    Quote Originally Posted by CameronBornAndBred View Post
    Let's hope the B1G didn't discover DBR!

  16. #1536
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mechanicsburg, PA
    Quote Originally Posted by budwom View Post
    yes, I take this as good news, even though it doesn't necessarily portend anything. I have zero inside knowledge, but would be stunned if Nina King hasn't been making some discrete inquiries in Big Ten Land. We find ourselves in a conference where literally half of it would be thrilled to leave us behind, so it's time to explore options. A bit surprising to hear that hoops may have SOME value in all this (fully recognizing TV football money is the center of the universe)...the troika of Duke, unc and UVA would have academic appeal to the Big 10, as would the other schools from out west...
    I agree and clearly the Big Ten is a better fit than the SEC if the ACC collapses.

  17. #1537
    Are we sure all this B1G stuff isn't just Scott working behind the scenes so he can get an annual Duke-Michigan basketball game?

  18. #1538
    Quote Originally Posted by budwom View Post
    yes, I take this as good news, even though it doesn't necessarily portend anything. I have zero inside knowledge, but would be stunned if Nina King hasn't been making some discrete inquiries in Big Ten Land. We find ourselves in a conference where literally half of it would be thrilled to leave us behind, so it's time to explore options. A bit surprising to hear that hoops may have SOME value in all this (fully recognizing TV football money is the center of the universe)...the troika of Duke, unc and UVA would have academic appeal to the Big 10, as would the other schools from out west...
    Yes, and Georgia Tech, the best engineering school in the South, which would fit nicely with the big honkin' tool schools of the B10.

  19. #1539
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Quote Originally Posted by LeadingEdge View Post
    Yes, and Georgia Tech, the best engineering school in the South, which would fit nicely with the big honkin' tool schools of the B10.
    fine by me! Yeah, you mention how big those schools are...I think a lot of folks may not appreciate the massive size of many of the Big 10 schools, and therefore the extent to which they have massive alumni bases (who watch football on TV) that dwarf the size of the typical ACC school. I'm too lazy to run the numbers, but if the average undergrad population of Big 10 schools is twice that of the average ACC school, I wouldn't be surprised in the least.

  20. #1540
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Quote Originally Posted by budwom View Post
    fine by me! Yeah, you mention how big those schools are...I think a lot of folks may not appreciate the massive size of many of the Big 10 schools, and therefore the extent to which they have massive alumni bases (who watch football on TV) that dwarf the size of the typical ACC school. I'm too lazy to run the numbers, but if the average undergrad population of Big 10 schools is twice that of the average ACC school, I wouldn't be surprised in the least.
    Here you go. I did this a while ago, so I don't remember exactly where I got the numbers (probably Wikipedia).

    Big Ten School Undergrads ACC School Undergrads
    Rutgers University 49,359 Florida State University 33,486
    Ohio State University 47,106 Virginia Tech 29,300
    Penn State 39,809 NC State University 25,973
    Michigan State University 39,176 Clemson University 20,195
    Purdue University 37,101 University of North Carolina 19,743
    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 34,559 University of Pittsburgh 19,200
    Indiana University - Bloomington 34,253 University of Virginia 17,011
    University of Wisconsin 33,506 Georgia Tech University 16,651
    University of California - Los Angeles 32,121 University of Louisville 15,641
    University of Michigan - Ann Arbor 31,329 Syracuse University 14,479
    University of Maryland - College Park 30,762 Boston College 9,445
    University of Minnesota - Twin Cities 30,734 Notre Dame 8,731
    University of Iowa 21,608 University of Miami 7,007
    University of Southern California 20,790 Duke University 6,789
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln 19,552 Wake Forest University 5,441
    Northwestern 8,327
    Total 510,092 Total 249,092
    Median 32,814 Median 16,651

Similar Threads

  1. Conference Realignment - Not Dead Yet
    By ChillinDuke in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-20-2016, 01:50 PM
  2. The Conference Realignment Vigil- Update: Terps to Big10?
    By A-Tex Devil in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 2015
    Last Post: 11-19-2012, 10:30 AM
  3. Baseball Realignment
    By SoCalDukeFan in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 07-06-2011, 11:36 PM
  4. Big East Realignment
    By johnb in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-23-2011, 09:29 PM
  5. NCAA Conference Realignment
    By A-Tex Devil in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 03-04-2010, 05:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •