Originally Posted by
House P
Sam going all-in was a sub-optimal bet and cost him the game last night (but would have won him the game if he had the correct response). I wonder what would happen if Amy and Sam end up in a similar scenario again. Would Amy take the same approach next time, or would she "bet to cover with a correct response", knowing that Sam went all-in once. In this sense, due to the nature of the multi-day competition between the same competitors, FJ betting seems a bit like a game of rock-paper-scissors (Amy knows that Sam chose "rock" last night, but would he do it again?).
She bet to cover Andrew (more or less) and ended up losing despite going in with a lead and getting FJ correct. I still maintain that has to be the worst feeling - to go into FJ with the lead, get the question right, and still lose because the bet was not high enough. I’d rather lose because I bet too much and got it wrong than lose because I got it right but didn’t bet enough.
Just be you. You is enough. - K, 4/5/10, 0:13.8 to play, 60-59 Duke.
You're all jealous hypocrites. - Titus on Laettner
You see those guys? Animals. They're animals. - SIU Coach Chris Lowery, on Duke