I don’t know if this is necessarily true. Graham only takes 3.5 two-point shots per game (and makes 1.3 of them). That’s a small sample size.
He shoots 38% from 3-pt range, which is pretty good. He gets 5 assists per game in only 30 mpg, not great, but not bad, particularly because he’s the one taking most of the 3-pt shots. He can’t get an assist by passing to himself.
Perhaps we should see what he does for at least one season with New Orleans before pronouncing it a bad move.
I might have missed some deals for such players, but I saw Doug McDermott got a 3 year $42 mil deal from the Spurs as a shooting specialist. I'm not sure one could expect to get Graham for much cheaper. TJ McConnell got 4/36 as a definite backup PG (who can't shoot a lick). I agree that Graham as a starter is bad news, but I am not sure one should expect a player who averaged 18 points and 7.5 assists in his second year as a pro with a good 3 point shot to make under $10 mil a year these days.
Well, the Lakers just got Malik Monk (40.1% from 3 last year) for the minimum. And I like both of the players you mentioned significantly more than Graham, so paying Graham more than both of them seems pretty bad. If you think Graham can hold up as a starting PG, then it's worth it. But I have no confidence in him and I think it's a bad contract.
The point isn't "Graham could be good." It's that Graham is WAY worse than Lonzo Ball, who they could have kept. I don't care 1 bit if he's not happy or even if he sits out every game until he gets traded. Satoranksy, Temple and a 2nd rounder is literally garbage. Nothing from that trade is going to help this team keep Zion.
I don't know much about Graham, but I am persuaded by this argument.
I follow the Pelicans because I'm local and I like Zion. Historically the Pelicans have made a number of low-cost, low-risk trades and free agency moves that seem kind of smart but kind of safe as well. I was worried they would retain Lonzo Ball or break the bank on the ancient Kyle Lowry, and so I was relieved that neither happened. But this Graham move doesn't make a lot of sense if they wanted to make a really big move -- like trading for Damian Lillard, who is restless in Portland but is also guaranteed more future money than anyone else in the league.
But I'm not sure the Pelicans ever want to make a really big move. There's a small market mentality here, plus a New Orleans mentality that is uninterested in alpha behavior. People seem happy with what they have. Even Saints fans, who are more passionate than Pelicans fans, have mentally prepared for an inevitable slide back to mediocrity.
FWIW, advanced metrics do not support the statement bolded above. Graham was better this past season in terms of EPM (+2.5/91st percentile vs. +2.1/89th for Lonzo) and win shares per 48 (0.99 vs. 0.89), while Lonzo had a higher PER (15.2 vs. 14.6). Which suggests a wash, if not a slight edge overall to Graham, especially when $$$ are taken into account ($47mm vs. $85mm over 4 years).
Monk is a clearly inferior player to Graham. He didn't get close to Graham's minutes when they were teammates. Neither player can really defend, but Graham offers the ability to be a primary ballhandler and contribute in starter-level minutes (5.4/1.8 A/T ratio on his career) and shoots the ball just about as well as Monk on higher degree of difficulty (i.e. he does more than just catch and shoot while Monk does not). McDermott is also getting paid more per year than Graham, so I guess I don't see it as Graham getting paid more even if the total is higher. However, I do like McDermott given his longer track record as a shooter. However, Graham has a lot more upside as a younger player who can do more with the ball than just shoot.
Looking at some Hornets fan sites, it seems they feel the Pels got a steal paying Graham just under $12 mil per year. In terms of the overall move, I don't love Graham as a starter, but I like the idea of keeping cap flexibility in the absence of a huge move. Signing a mediocre player like Lonzo for nearly twice the money seems like an awful move. Lonzo is worse than Graham in the half court. He's a better defender and is great in transition, but I don't think that is worth an extra $9 mil a year. In addition, let's not forget that the Pelicans offloaded two awful contracts before the draft and got a better fit, offensively at least, at center in Valanciunas. I think they are overall in better position than they were before all these moves, but they definitely have a long way to go.
Looks like Hill is going to Milwaukee. Makes sense. He is getting up there in age and doesn't have a ring yet. Probably not starting caliber anymore at the point, but he is definitely a solid bench player for the reasons you mention. Definitely an upgrade on Jeff Teague for the Bucks from what we saw from Teague in the playoffs.
To add to the personnel problems for the Pels... Jaxson Hayes was arrested last week for resisting arrest while police were responding to a domestic dispute call. Additionally there is an investigation into police use of force against him during the altercation.
https://www.foxla.com/news/nbas-jaxs...ief-moore-says
There is chatter that Zion could be the first to turn down a max extension, take his qualifying offer, and become a free agent earlier.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mortenj...h=625e8ea5177a