Page 45 of 68 FirstFirst ... 35434445464755 ... LastLast
Results 881 to 900 of 1351
  1. #881
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    good article in the Times today about how Chinese consumers are falling out of love with foreign cars, and are heavily buying the local brands, electric and otherwise...

  2. #882
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    In the old days, this was true. An EV hobbyist would monitor individual cells and swap out dying cells as needed. Most modern battery packs have a lot of complex interconnections to spread the load as evenly as possible across the individual cells, adjusting draw to each cell as needed to preserve the life of the overall set for as long as possible without requiring individual cell replacement. Also, the packs are typically fairly buried and they are very heavy, so taking the pack out to work on it or swap cells is a pretty big job. In general, the progression has been from simple and easily replaceable individual cells toward complex circuitry leading to treating a collection of cells as a single unit. Never say never, but I don't know that a regression back to simple and swappable cells will be on the horizon any time soon.
    People all have their different moments, but *this* is what I come to DBR for (and the puns). Excellent sharing of knowledge that I wouldn’t have been likely to pick up somewhere else, unless it were mentioned in a news article or essay about EVs.
    Carolina delenda est

  3. #883
    It’ll be at least Q3 of 24 before you can get your hands on one, but the VW ID.7 (a roughly Passat-sized sedan) looks extremely promising.

    https://youtu.be/R3pg2__omKo

  4. #884
    A pretty brutal assessment of Tesla stock’s prospects. Aka “at last, a valuation that makes sense.”

    https://fortune.com/2023/04/20/tesla...price-outlook/

  5. #885
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Dur'm
    Quote Originally Posted by burnspbesq View Post
    A pretty brutal assessment of Tesla stock’s prospects. Aka “at last, a valuation that makes sense.”

    https://fortune.com/2023/04/20/tesla...price-outlook/
    Too bad it's paywalled.

  6. #886
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    Too bad it's paywalled.
    Does this Link work? MSN has a version of the story.

    MSN - Tesla's Coming Crash

  7. #887
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Dur'm
    Quote Originally Posted by camion View Post
    Does this Link work? MSN has a version of the story.

    MSN - Tesla's Coming Crash
    Indeed, it does. Thank you.

    And “Tesla’s really admitting that the car business won’t make the money Musk was projecting, and it’s clear that claims the ancillary business will supply the needed extra growth are a shell game.” Ouch. That's a harsh critique.
    Last edited by Phredd3; 04-21-2023 at 11:11 AM.

  8. #888
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    Indeed, it does. Thank you.

    And “Tesla’s really admitting that the car business won’t make the money Musk was projecting, and it’s clear that claims the ancillary business will supply the needed extra growth are a shell game.” Ouch. That's a harsh critique.
    Luckily Musk still has Twitter to fall back on to provide needed cash. Once the reorganization is complete they should have essentially $0 labor cost .

  9. #889
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Franklin TN
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    Indeed, it does. Thank you.

    And “Tesla’s really admitting that the car business won’t make the money Musk was projecting, and it’s clear that claims the ancillary business will supply the needed extra growth are a shell game.” Ouch. That's a harsh critique.
    If GM’s PE is less than 6, how can Tesla still sell for a 50 PE? It’s a car company. It’s now discounting almost every few weeks. All its models are long in the tooth. The crazy pickup is butt ugly.

    Having said all that, what Elon has done is amazing. No one else has started a new car company in decades, almost a century. But Tesla hasn’t cured cancer, turned water to gold, etc. It is a car company. On top of that Elon has done a lot of damage to Tesla with his bizarre behavior. I have friends who own Teslas who will not buy another one.

    Tesla has existed with no real competition. That will rapidly change over the next two years. This article will be the start of many to come over the next few months.

  10. #890

    EVs Fall Short of EPA Estimates by a Much Larger Margin Than Gas Cars

    ...in Our Real-World Highway Testing

    From Car and Driver

    While internal-combustion cars often match or exceed their EPA highway fuel economy numbers, a new paper using data from C/D's highway tests show that EVs are far worse at meeting expectations.


    BY CALEB MILLER PUBLISHED: APR 21, 2023

    https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4...s-sae-article/

  11. #891
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    And “Tesla’s really admitting that the car business won’t make the money Musk was projecting, and it’s clear that claims the ancillary business will supply the needed extra growth are a shell game.” Ouch. That's a harsh critique.
    But, Cathie says….

    https://ark-invest.com/articles/valu...e-target-2027/

    And, she even has a Monte Carlo simulation! Cathie knows the variables’ statistical dependencies.

  12. #892
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Dur'm
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffrey View Post
    But, Cathie says….

    https://ark-invest.com/articles/valu...e-target-2027/

    And, she even has a Monte Carlo simulation! Cathie knows the variables’ statistical dependencies.
    "Tesla’s prospective robotaxi business line is a key driver..." That amounts to saying that Tesla will have economically viable self-driving tech in four years. Uh-huh.

  13. #893
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    "Tesla’s prospective robotaxi business line is a key driver..." That amounts to saying that Tesla will have economically viable self-driving tech in four years. Uh-huh.
    I believe that in four years Tesla will have reliable self-driving tech within four years. And so on.

    At some point it will be true if Tesla survives long enough.

  14. #894
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    "Tesla’s prospective robotaxi business line is a key driver..." That amounts to saying that Tesla will have economically viable self-driving tech in four years. Uh-huh.
    Relying on vaporware leads to vapor valuations.

  15. #895
    Quote Originally Posted by YmoBeThere View Post
    ...in Our Real-World Highway Testing

    From Car and Driver

    While internal-combustion cars often match or exceed their EPA highway fuel economy numbers, a new paper using data from C/D's highway tests show that EVs are far worse at meeting expectations.


    BY CALEB MILLER PUBLISHED: APR 21, 2023

    https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4...s-sae-article/
    I would argue that steady-state 75 mph is not “real world.”

    It’s also an open secret that a certain EV maker, run by a narcissistic megalomaniac who’s never met a Federal law he didn’t want to violate, routinely games the EPA testing procedures.

  16. #896
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC area
    Quote Originally Posted by YmoBeThere View Post
    ...in Our Real-World Highway Testing

    From Car and Driver

    While internal-combustion cars often match or exceed their EPA highway fuel economy numbers, a new paper using data from C/D's highway tests show that EVs are far worse at meeting expectations.


    BY CALEB MILLER PUBLISHED: APR 21, 2023

    https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4...s-sae-article/
    There was a time the EPA gas MPG numbers were a complete joke, too. EVs are still relatively new. It takes time - and some stumbles - to get there.

    -jk

  17. #897
    Quote Originally Posted by YmoBeThere View Post
    ...in Our Real-World Highway Testing

    From Car and Driver

    While internal-combustion cars often match or exceed their EPA highway fuel economy numbers, a new paper using data from C/D's highway tests show that EVs are far worse at meeting expectations.


    BY CALEB MILLER PUBLISHED: APR 21, 2023

    https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4...s-sae-article/
    How are they taking into account the weather? I'm sure the EPA figures are from a moderate climate. Last I checked C/D's garage was in Michigan. EV's do worse in the cold.

  18. #898
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Kdogg View Post
    EV's do worse in the cold.
    So do gas-powered vehicles.

  19. #899
    Quote Originally Posted by CDu View Post
    So do gas-powered vehicles.
    True but at 75 mph it's less of an issue even with the increased air resistance. There's also the belief that fuel pumped in the cold is more energy dense so it would even out. While it might technically be true, I don't think it has a meaningful impact.

  20. #900
    Quote Originally Posted by Kdogg View Post
    True but at 75 mph it's less of an issue even with the increased air resistance. There's also the belief that fuel pumped in the cold is more energy dense so it would even out. While it might technically be true, I don't think it has a meaningful impact.
    Maybe *that’s* why I always get much better mileage driving from the cold Sierra Nevada in the winter to the warm SoCal coast compared to the trip up from the warmth to the cold.
    Carolina delenda est

Similar Threads

  1. Poll Skew 2: Electric Boogaloo
    By Acymetric in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-30-2008, 06:13 PM
  2. Electric Razor
    By ugadevil in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-19-2007, 03:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •