Two of the three "expert" attorneys quoted in the article actually say they DIDN'T think there was enough for probable cause to get a warrant. Only one did, an attorney named Hart Levin. I know him. He's a nice guy but when the question "who are the top DUI lawyers in LA" comes up, his name is not mentioned. Regardless, the opinions of attorneys as to whether there was enough to get a warrant are largely irrelevant. It's the judge to whom the warrant would be presented by law enforcement whose opinion matters. I have personally spoken to five or six Southern California judges (all of whom handle criminal cases every day) on this issue and not one of them said he/she would have signed the warrant in this case based upon the evidence in the public domain, including the empty unmarked pill bottle. Not one.