Page 42 of 74 FirstFirst ... 32404142434452 ... LastLast
Results 821 to 840 of 1469
  1. #821
    Agree that he runner on third should have scored but to say one play caused State to lose is false. State had 27 outs and 9 innings to score a run and failed 27 times. It’s was a team loss and a great team win for duke.

  2. #822
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New Bern, NC unless it's a home football game then I'm grilling on Devil's Alley
    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleBlue View Post
    It was mentioned, and it ended up costing them the game... or a tie at the time. The announcers really let him have it about such an obvious inexcusable mental error.
    Good analysis from the announcers. They said no coach likes an error, but (to sum up) "Physical ones are excusable. Balls bounce out, gloves miss. But a coach will jump over you all day long on a mental error. Those are inexcusable. Know the game."
    Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."

  3. #823
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Quote Originally Posted by richmclean View Post
    Agree that he runner on third should have scored but to say one play caused State to lose is false. State had 27 outs and 9 innings to score a run and failed 27 times. It’s was a team loss and a great team win for duke.
    It was just a monumentally boneheaded play, nothing more or less, but it obviously cost them a run and an opportunity to win...

  4. #824
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New Bern, NC unless it's a home football game then I'm grilling on Devil's Alley
    Quote Originally Posted by budwom View Post
    It was just a monumentally boneheaded play, nothing more or less, but it obviously cost them a run and an opportunity to win...
    mqdefault.jpg
    Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."

  5. #825
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by CameronDuke View Post
    Good showing in Charlotte from the team. Way to go on the first league tournament title since 1961.

    I’m seeing Duke projected as a 3 or 4 seed in the Greenville, North Carolina regional hosted by East Carolina in lots of places I’m reading.

    1. East Carolina
    2. Old Dominion
    3. Duke
    4. Virginia Commonwealth
    I assume you mistyped. No way Duke is a 4 seed. Four seeds are teams from low-major, one-bid conferences. Duke's RPI is in the low 20s, maybe upper teens after today. So, on merit Duke deserves to be a 2 seed. Remember, in theory the two seeds are the teams from 17 through 32. Not only is Duke in that bracket, they are in the top end of that bracket.

    But the NCAA has not done Duke baseball any favors and there's no reason to think anything will change tomorrow.

  6. #826
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsumner View Post
    I assume you mistyped. No way Duke is a 4 seed. Four seeds are teams from low-major, one-bid conferences. Duke's RPI is in the low 20s, maybe upper teens after today. So, on merit Duke deserves to be a 2 seed. Remember, in theory the two seeds are the teams from 17 through 32. Not only is Duke in that bracket, they are in the top end of that bracket.

    But the NCAA has not done Duke baseball any favors and there's no reason to think anything will change tomorrow.
    Duke's RPI is now 19, and as ACC Champions, they should be an upper 2 seed.

  7. #827
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleBlue View Post
    Duke's RPI is now 19, and as ACC Champions, they should be an upper 2 seed.
    Qualifier duty noted. "Should be."

  8. #828
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsumner View Post
    I assume you mistyped. No way Duke is a 4 seed. Four seeds are teams from low-major, one-bid conferences. Duke's RPI is in the low 20s, maybe upper teens after today. So, on merit Duke deserves to be a 2 seed. Remember, in theory the two seeds are the teams from 17 through 32. Not only is Duke in that bracket, they are in the top end of that bracket.

    But the NCAA has not done Duke baseball any favors and there's no reason to think anything will change tomorrow.
    That was what I read yesterday on D1Baseball.com, but it will change with Duke winning the ACCT. I see them as a 2-3 seed, hopefully a 2.

    And Virginia Commonwealth is the hottest team in the country. They have won 21 in a row and are 37-14. They just won the A10 tournament in Richmond and haven’t lost since April 11th. Their RPI is not as high as Duke’s since VCU plays in the A10 with some terrible teams, but their RPI is 31st in the country. I think they should be a 2 seed, too. They swept UVa this season (RPI of 39) in a pair of midweek games, beat Central Michigan (RPI of 52 and won the MAC Tournament), split with Virginia Tech on the road (RPI of 70) in a pair of midweek games, and split with ODU in a pair of midweek games (RPI of 9). I’d watch out for them in the regionals, it is hard to win 21 games in a row at any level. The last regional they played in was in 2015 when they won the A10 Tournament and went to the Dallas Baptist regional. They ended up winning that regional before losing a pair of games at Miami (Florida) in the super regionals. They’re a legitimate program that I think should be a 2 seed somewhere, too.

  9. #829
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Like I said, the projections are changing on D1Baseball.com.

    Right now, Duke is a projected 3 seed in the Eugene regional:

    1. Oregon
    2. Nebraska
    3. Duke
    4. North Dakota State

  10. #830
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mechanicsburg, PA
    FWIW, BaseballAmerica has Duke as a 2 seed in Arizona’s pod

  11. #831
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Here are your 16 Regional hosts:

    Austin, Texas (Texas) — 42-15
    Columbia, S.C. (South Carolina) — 33-21
    Eugene, Oregon (Oregon) — 37-14
    Fayetteville, Ark. (Arkansas) — 45-10
    Fort Worth, Texas (TCU) — 39-17
    Gainesville, Fla. (Florida) — 38-20
    Greenville, N.C. (East Carolina) — 41-15
    Knoxville, Tenn. (Tennessee) — 45-15
    Lubbock, Texas (Texas Tech) — 36-15
    Nashville, Tenn. (Vanderbilt) — 40-15
    Oxford, Miss. (Ole Miss) — 41-19
    Ruston, La. (Louisiana Tech) — 40-17
    South Bend, Ind. (Notre Dame) — 30-11
    Stanford, Calif. (Stanford) — 33-14
    Starkville, Miss. (Mississippi State) — 40-15
    Tucson, Ariz. (Arizona) — 40-15

  12. #832
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by CameronDuke View Post
    That was what I read yesterday on D1Baseball.com, but it will change with Duke winning the ACCT. I see them as a 2-3 seed, hopefully a 2.

    And Virginia Commonwealth is the hottest team in the country. They have won 21 in a row and are 37-14. They just won the A10 tournament in Richmond and haven’t lost since April 11th. Their RPI is not as high as Duke’s since VCU plays in the A10 with some terrible teams, but their RPI is 31st in the country. I think they should be a 2 seed, too. They swept UVa this season (RPI of 39) in a pair of midweek games, beat Central Michigan (RPI of 52 and won the MAC Tournament), split with Virginia Tech on the road (RPI of 70) in a pair of midweek games, and split with ODU in a pair of midweek games (RPI of 9). I’d watch out for them in the regionals, it is hard to win 21 games in a row at any level. The last regional they played in was in 2015 when they won the A10 Tournament and went to the Dallas Baptist regional. They ended up winning that regional before losing a pair of games at Miami (Florida) in the super regionals. They’re a legitimate program that I think should be a 2 seed somewhere, too.
    I'm sorry but you must have misread. I follow this stuff pretty closely. An ACC team being seeded fourth would be analogous to an ACC basketball team being seeded 15th in an NCAA Tournament regional. D1 baseball had Duke as a three seed going into the ACCs and certainly nothing that happened in Charlotte or anywhere else would have dropped Duke to a four.

  13. #833
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsumner View Post
    I'm sorry but you must have misread. I follow this stuff pretty closely. An ACC team being seeded fourth would be analogous to an ACC basketball team being seeded 15th in an NCAA Tournament regional. D1 baseball had Duke as a three seed going into the ACCs and certainly nothing that happened in Charlotte or anywhere else would have dropped Duke to a four.
    Yes I agree, I’m pretty sure I saw them projected as a 3 and not a 4 going into the ACCs.

  14. #834
    At this point, it seems the most likely outcome is that Duke ends up as a two seed in either Columbia or Greenville—bur I have plenty of Duke masks in case they get sent to Austin or Fort Worth. Lubbock might be too far to go.

  15. #835
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by burnspbesq View Post
    At this point, it seems the most likely outcome is that Duke ends up as a two seed in either Columbia or Greenville—bur I have plenty of Duke masks in case they get sent to Austin or Fort Worth. Lubbock might be too far to go.
    Baseball America updated their projections about 10 minutes ago. Duke wasn’t projected in either the Columbia or Greenville regional.

    Columbia regional

    1. Old Dominion (traveling 1 seed since they can’t host a regional)
    2. South Carolina
    3. Virginia
    4. Samford

    Greenville regional

    1. East Carolina
    2. North Carolina State
    3. Liberty
    4. Norfolk State

    Duke is projected as a 2 seed in the Tucson regional most recently:

    Tucson regional

    1. Arizona
    2. Duke
    3. Fairfield
    4. Grand Canyon

  16. #836
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    For some perspective, the NCAA has sent recent Duke teams to Columbia, Athens and Morgantown. I'd like to keep the trend going and stick reasonably close to home. But, as someone stated upthread, somebody is going to be packing the bags and going out west and I fear it may be Duke's turn.

    It will be interesting to see which Triangle school gets sent to ECU. One would think that Duke earned that right this week. Then again, Duke's two outings against the Pirates did not go well for Duke, so maybe we don't want that. Then again, part2, those games were pretty early in the season and Duke is a much better team now.

  17. #837

    Analytics be damned?

    I didn't see where anyone mentioned this (apologies if I just missed it), but analytics have repeatedly shown that taking an out to bunt a guy over is not the higher percentage play. And to attempt a bunt with your CLEANUP hitter, a guy that clearly doesn't feel all that comfortable bunting?! I mean, they had the crowd and the momentum, leadoff runner on, and the manager took the bat out of one of their best hitter's hands. I still can't believe it. To me, that was almost more egregious than the baserunning error.
    T '05, SOM '10

  18. #838
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    I moved. Now 12 miles from Heaven, 13 from Hell
    Quote Originally Posted by coldriver10 View Post
    I didn't see where anyone mentioned this (apologies if I just missed it), but analytics have repeatedly shown that taking an out to bunt a guy over is not the higher percentage play. And to attempt a bunt with your CLEANUP hitter, a guy that clearly doesn't feel all that comfortable bunting?! I mean, they had the crowd and the momentum, leadoff runner on, and the manager took the bat out of one of their best hitter's hands. I still can't believe it. To me, that was almost more egregious than the baserunning error.
    I believe a successful sacrifice bunt increases the chance that ONE run scores, but decreases the chance that MULTIPLE runs score. So if you just need one run, it does make sense.

    It does have to be successful, so having a batter who is not good at bunting decreases the chance, and therefore the benefit, of scoring a run.

  19. #839
    This morning, BA has Duke as the two seed in Greenville. D1baseball.com has Duke as the two seed in Austin.

  20. #840
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Lewisville, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by CameronDuke View Post
    Here are your 16 Regional hosts:

    Austin, Texas (Texas) — 42-15
    Columbia, S.C. (South Carolina) — 33-21
    Eugene, Oregon (Oregon) — 37-14
    Fayetteville, Ark. (Arkansas) — 45-10
    Fort Worth, Texas (TCU) — 39-17
    Gainesville, Fla. (Florida) — 38-20
    Greenville, N.C. (East Carolina) — 41-15
    Knoxville, Tenn. (Tennessee) — 45-15
    Lubbock, Texas (Texas Tech) — 36-15
    Nashville, Tenn. (Vanderbilt) — 40-15
    Oxford, Miss. (Ole Miss) — 41-19
    Ruston, La. (Louisiana Tech) — 40-17
    South Bend, Ind. (Notre Dame) — 30-11
    Stanford, Calif. (Stanford) — 33-14
    Starkville, Miss. (Mississippi State) — 40-15
    Tucson, Ariz. (Arizona) — 40-15
    7 SEC teams as hosts and only one ACC team hosting

Similar Threads

  1. Can we just move to 2021 right now?
    By dudog84 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 242
    Last Post: 01-09-2021, 09:26 AM
  2. 2021 Duke Football Recruiting
    By chrishoke in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 217
    Last Post: 01-01-2021, 07:29 PM
  3. 2020-2021 Roster
    By Jaks19 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-12-2020, 09:04 AM
  4. Duke Sports Hall of Fame Induction Banquet moved to 2021
    By jimsumner in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-02-2020, 09:43 PM
  5. Dear Class of 2021,
    By duke_blue2010 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-27-2018, 11:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •