Originally Posted by
Stray Gator
I think the Beatles will forever be admired most by those of us who were contemporaries of their emergence as a musical influence, and who experienced firsthand the cultural phenomenon they created. Context is always important in analyzing the historical impact of personalities and events.
For Boomers, one of our most prominent generation-defining events was the assassination of President Kennedy. If you go back and examine the Billboard Top 50 on the day after that tragedy, you'll see that the state of American popular music was pretty much a wasteland. The Number 1 record -- back then, sales were measured based on the sales of 45 rpm singles -- was "I'm Leaving It Up To You," by Dale and Grace. The Top Ten was populated by such memorable toe-tappers as "She's A Fool" by Leslie Gore, "Bossa Nova Baby" by Elvis Presley, and "Dominique" by The Singing Nun. Seriously; you can look for yourself. Just 10 weeks later, the Beatles reached Number 1 for the first time with "I Want To Hold Your Hand" -- a song that had vaulted 42 spots to #3 the week before. Also on the Billboard chart for February 1, 1964 was "She Loves You," which had jumped an incredible 48 spots to #21 in one week.
The Beatles brought a fresh sound, a fresh look, and a fresh personality to an American youth that was hungry for a new fad. They weren't surfer boys or hot rod racers or hootenanny folkies who happened to pick up instruments and harmonize a two-and-a-half-minute rhythmic rhyme. They were talented musicians, who looked and acted a bit funny, and spoke with charmingly different -- but not too different -- accents. In addition, they produced a seemingly endless series of songs in quick succession that didn't sound alike, but all of which had catchy tunes and easily memorable lyrics. Unlike other artists, their 45 records had no "B" sides; both sides were typically hits. But most importantly -- and this is what I believe ultimately elevated them to a special plateau -- both they and their music continued to evolve, introducing innovations in sound and style that created trends for others to follow. But I digress . . .
Include me in the group that never found Bruce Springsteen's music to be particularly notable or enjoyable. As for country music, I don't care for the commercially successful Nashville sound or Bakersfield sound; but I really like a lot of the older country and bluegrass music -- for example, I consider my copy of "Will The Circle Be Unbroken" by the Nitty Gritty Dirt Band, with a star-studded cast of country and bluegrass artists, to be a treasure. Regarding Dylan, I have similar mixed feelings -- I certainly admire his songwriting throughout his career, and I rate "Blood On The Tracks" as one of my Top Ten albums; but other than that album and occasionally "Nashville Skyline," I don't really much enjoy listening to his records.
Finally, since this thread seems to invite expressions of opinion about favorite musicians or, more broadly perhaps, most respected musical artists, allow me to cast a vote for a singer/songwriter/guitarist who, I believe, has demonstrated extraordinary versatility by succeeding as a songwriter and performer across multiple genres, both solo and with a number of well-known groups, over a period of six decades: Neil Young.