Well, that is certainly true.
Hey, I like Vernon Carey and wish him well. In fact, I like him so much that for my own selfish reasons I would love for him to stay at Duke for four years. I’m just not optimistic about his chances of making it as a starter in the NBA, that’s all.
It’s a whole new world for big men trying to make it in the modern NBA. I hope Vernon proves my skepticism about his chances to be 100% wrong. That would make me happy. 😊
Well darn it all, if it is indeed true that Carey has more skills than he has been exhibiting at Duke what in the heck are he and K waiting for?
Are they planning to spring a surprise in the Regional Finals and finally unleash his full arsenal on an unwitting (and therefore, doomed) opponent? I don’t understand.
VC will be fine. He can shoot and he can run. He’s big and strong with good footwork without being a tall loafing center. He’s also tough and has an edge. He’s actually perfect for the NBA as a team guy. Again look at Draymond Green. There are more guys that VC matches well to in the NBA than we are giving him credit for. Whether he is ever a starter or 2nd team depends on how prepared he is coming into the league. Staying at Duke won’t help. He has to go this year. And Duke, Coach K especially, has to get their BLEEP together mentally and start kicking arse And winning. These bad losses are hurting VCs stock more than he is.
This is an interesting issue....I don't know if his game per se has been changed, but I do know in high school he played more on the perimeter, at least by reputation. It is very unusual for this to happen...a guy moves inside in college instead of outside. Now, has he "lost" his outside game? I doubt it. I think it's more likely he has found an inside game, and having both will help him.
Now, will this utilization help Duke in March, hopefully April? Jury still out.
I think a big part of it was team composition and competition in high school. He played with Scottie Barnes, one of the top prospects in next year's class. That meant that he could coast a bit more. While I don't think he's ever been a great perimeter shooter, he's a capable perimeter shooter. And in high school, that was probably enough. The question with Carey coming in was going to be the "want to." A big chunk of that was how willing he would be to do the dirty work inside. Clearly, he's shown that willingness on this team.
Man, I don't have the answers you are wanting me to give, sorry. I am not sure what you are insinuating.
Maybe we have only one strong tall player so we use him under the basket? Are you suggesting that the reports of him playing on the perimeter in high school are lies?
I'm sure K has good reason to use Carey as he does, whether it's need or perceived skillset.
You just said he was an "old school" back to the basket guy, and I told you what I've heard repeatedly on in-game broadcasts. I wasn't trying to call you a liar or start a fistfight.
Maybe Carey completely lost his handles and outside shot. Maybe K is waiting to unleash his mad perimeter game the second weekend of the tournament. Maybe he turned into a Tim Duncan old school big when he got to Durham. I don't know.
on the offensive side of the ball, i can't imagine that anyone on this board is seriously concerned about Vernon's development nor that he isn't showing something that he can in fact do.
It's on the defensive side of the ball that Big Vern has issues. He's a fine defender against other bigs, it's when he gets isolated on guards/wings that are good at finishing at the rim that he has become a real liability and one that teams are picking up on.
It is K's responsibility to recognize this and design a different defensive scheme to limit this sort of exposure. Every single team that has strong, powerful guards that are good at driving have exposed the lack of defensive scheme to control it and burned Duke badly with it. K's legendary stubbornness is costing this team (as it did in 2014). I hope K and the coaches are flexible enough to come up with a different scheme or allow the players to utilize a different one within games so that this team can achieve it's potential. Cuz it sure ain't gonna achieve the potential if we continually allow the opponents' guards to get isolated on Vernon and drive to the rim. And none of this is to say that Vernon is at fault for this, he shouldn't be tasked with staying in front of fast guards.
I think we could and perhaps should open up Carey's game a bit more on occasion. Flash him out to the perimeter once in a while. Let him take more mid-range jumpers. Then on the next trip down, post him up and let him use his new-found "old-school center" skills.
If he's Inspector Gadget, I think we should utilize all facets of his gadgetdom. Whatever it takes to gain an advantage works for me.
"We are not provided with wisdom, we must discover it for ourselves, after a journey through the wilderness which no one else can take for us, an effort which no one can spare us, for our wisdom is the point of view from which we come at last to regard the world." --M. Proust
For those currious, here is Vernon's shot chart. He's not as bad from three as I thought I remembered; especially from the top of the key. The top number is FG% in that specific zone (top of key 3, top of key 2, restricted area, etc.) and the second number is points-per-shot (FG% * number of points the shot is worth.) Screen Shot 2020-02-28 at 5.01.59 PM.jpg
Edit: for some reason I can't figure out how to make the image more hi-res. So here is the imgur link for better viewability: https://i.imgur.com/ghAn3mB.jpg
Perhaps, but your assertion still seems off to me. Below is a table showing our adjusted dRating against every opponent this season:
Look at the teams with adjusted ppp above 1 (top of the chart) and the teams with adjusted ppp below 0.9 (middle and bottom of the chart). Now tell me again that "every single team [with] strong, powerful guards that are good at driving" punished our defense. Or even that the teams that punished our defense all had strong, powerful guards that are good at driving.Code:Team unad dR adj dR W Forest 2 1.184 1.132 NCSU 1.155 1.080 Clemson 1.075 1.062 Syracuse 1.148 1.053 Pitt 1.049 1.041 UNC 1.031 1.003 SF Austin 1.011 1.000 Wofford 0.950 0.935 Va Tech 1 0.950 0.923 Winthrop 0.940 0.919 L'Ville 1.020 0.898 Mich St 0.991 0.888 Ga Tech 0.894 0.887 Va Tech 2 0.882 0.855 FSU 0.916 0.828 W Forest 1 0.865 0.813 Ga St 0.850 0.810 BC 2 0.779 0.809 Cal 0.791 0.807 G-town 0.905 0.806 Miami 1 0.854 0.788 Miami 2 0.827 0.761 C Ark 0.671 0.715 N Dame 0.795 0.710 BC 1 0.664 0.694 Kansas 0.820 0.689 Brown 0.734 0.676 Col St 0.719 0.657
(note that the table above does not adjust for home/away/neutral; it merely adjusts by taking into account each team's KenPom oRating vs. defensive performance in that game)