Page 80 of 1110 FirstFirst ... 30707879808182901301805801080 ... LastLast
Results 1,581 to 1,600 of 22200
  1. #1581
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Dur'm
    Quote Originally Posted by fisheyes View Post
    This is real folks.
    Deadly real.
    I suspect that the overwhelming majority on this board understand that.
    Since this was posted in response to me, I just wanted to clarify that my entire family went into self-quarantine as soon as my son said he had cold-like symptoms. All the signs point to this being just a common cold, not corona, but we aren't taking any chances with anyone else's lives. Meanwhile, the end of my post was serious. There are still many deniers. Do everything you can to NOT get sick, and pray you are successful at it.

    Thanks, fisheyes, for bringing us news from the front lines. Call a TV station. Get the story out.

  2. #1582
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Westport, CT
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    Since this was posted in response to me, I just wanted to clarify that my entire family went into self-quarantine as soon as my son said he had cold-like symptoms. All the signs point to this being just a common cold, not corona, but we aren't taking any chances with anyone else's lives. Meanwhile, the end of my post was serious. There are still many deniers. Do everything you can to NOT get sick, and pray you are successful at it.

    Thanks, fisheyes, for bringing us news from the front lines. Call a TV station. Get the story out.
    I didn't mean to imply anything about you personally but used your post as a jumping off point.
    Sorry if there was any confusion.

  3. #1583
    My small business has made the decision to close through the end of the month and reevaluate at that time. Also, we are paying staff 70% of average wages to stay home and reduce their personal risk and the risk of community health.

  4. #1584
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Winston-Salem
    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn.Devil.91.92.01.10.15 View Post
    My small business has made the decision to close through the end of the month and reevaluate at that time. Also, we are paying staff 70% of average wages to stay home and reduce their personal risk and the risk of community health.
    Just read that Trump wants to send folks $1k a month (excluding millionaires). That should help.

  5. #1585
    Quote Originally Posted by mattman91 View Post
    Just read that Trump wants to send folks $1k a month (excluding millionaires). That should help.
    Was actually Romney's proposal.

  6. #1586
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Winston-Salem
    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn.Devil.91.92.01.10.15 View Post
    My small business has made the decision to close through the end of the month and reevaluate at that time. Also, we are paying staff 70% of average wages to stay home and reduce their personal risk and the risk of community health.
    Also, feel free to send your employees over to me if they are interested in any temporary assignments

  7. #1587
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Winston-Salem
    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn.Devil.91.92.01.10.15 View Post
    Was actually Romney's proposal.
    Regardless, looks like it has bipartisan support. Somewhere Andy Yang is smiling 🧢

  8. #1588
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tampa
    Quote Originally Posted by swood1000 View Post
    • 80% of laboratory confirmed patients have had mild to moderate disease, which includes pneumonia
    • 13.8% have severe disease (dyspnea, respiratory frequency ≥30/minute, blood oxygen saturation ≤93%, PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300, and/or lung infiltrates >50% of the lung field within 24-48 hours)
    • 6.1% are critical (respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction/failure)

    Which group sounds good?
    Is the goal of the social distancing efforts to keep a larger percentage of the public from catching the virus at all or, rather, to spread out, over time, the same basic number of infections so as not to overwhelm limited health care resources? Or (hopefully) both? There seem to be conflicting signals, which, in my opinion, is clouding the urgency of the social distancing message, particularly among young adults.

  9. #1589
    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn.Devil.91.92.01.10.15 View Post
    My small business has made the decision to close through the end of the month and reevaluate at that time. Also, we are paying staff 70% of average wages to stay home and reduce their personal risk and the risk of community health.
    This is great. Hopefully your business will be rewarded!

  10. #1590
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Dur'm
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaDuke View Post
    Is the goal of the social distancing efforts to keep a larger percentage of the public from catching the virus at all or, rather, to spread out, over time, the same basic number of infections so as not to overwhelm limited health care resources? Or (hopefully) both?
    It's both. At some point, assuming immunity is lasting, which so far looks to be the case, we will start to get herd effects to reduce the total number of cases. If you delay infection for long enough, we may even have a vaccine to reduce numbers even further. But we have to get from here to there slowly enough to not choke the system and increase deaths, even if the basic number of infections ends up unchanged.

  11. #1591
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaDuke View Post
    Is the goal of the social distancing efforts to keep a larger percentage of the public from catching the virus at all or, rather, to spread out, over time, the same basic number of infections so as not to overwhelm limited health care resources? Or (hopefully) both? There seem to be conflicting signals, which, in my opinion, is clouding the urgency of the social distancing message, particularly among young adults.
    I think the theory is to spread it out, but the reality (if we believe the numbers from China) is that it actually can take the numbers way way down.

  12. #1592
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaDuke View Post
    Is the goal of the social distancing efforts to keep a larger percentage of the public from catching the virus at all or, rather, to spread out, over time, the same basic number of infections so as not to overwhelm limited health care resources? Or (hopefully) both? There seem to be conflicting signals, which, in my opinion, is clouding the urgency of the social distancing message, particularly among young adults.
    Well, of course if you adequately distance yourself from infected people you won’t become infected, so this would be ‘both,’ to the extent that the distancing falls short of perfection.

    The WHO China Joint Mission Report suggested that 80% of transmission occurred in the household, although this was in a context where interpersonal contacts were drastically reduced by the interventions put in place. Here’s how that report defined social distancing:

    Social distancing: At the national level, the State Council extended the Spring Festival holiday in 2020, all parts of the country actively cancelled or suspended activities like sport events, cinema, theatre, and schools and colleges in all parts of the country postponed reopening after the holiday. Enterprises and institutions have staggered their return to work. Transportation Departments setup thousands of health and quarantine stations in national service areas, and in entrances and exits for passengers at stations. Hubei Province adopted the most stringent traffic control measures, such as suspension of urban public transport, including subway, ferry and long-distance passenger transport. Every citizen has to wear a mask in public. Home support mechanisms were established. As a consequence of all of these measures, public life is very reduced.

  13. #1593
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Nrrrrvous View Post
    I have apparently maxed out my free WaPo articles. Can you give us the basics?
    Lots of media sites are waiving their paywalls for COVID-19 articles.

  14. #1594
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Steamboat Springs, CO
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaDuke View Post
    Is the goal of the social distancing efforts to keep a larger percentage of the public from catching the virus at all or, rather, to spread out, over time, the same basic number of infections so as not to overwhelm limited health care resources? Or (hopefully) both? There seem to be conflicting signals, which, in my opinion, is clouding the urgency of the social distancing message, particularly among young adults.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    It's both. At some point, assuming immunity is lasting, which so far looks to be the case, we will start to get herd effects to reduce the total number of cases. If you delay infection for long enough, we may even have a vaccine to reduce numbers even further. But we have to get from here to there slowly enough to not choke the system and increase deaths, even if the basic number of infections ends up unchanged.
    Quote Originally Posted by fidel View Post
    I think the theory is to spread it out, but the reality (if we believe the numbers from China) is that it actually can take the numbers way way down.
    I agree that the ultimate purpose of social distancing has not been crisply stated. I believe the answer is "both." Better medical care, which occurs if we can avoid a spike in cases, means fewer deaths. Fewer cases, if we can reduce the overall infection rate, mean fewer serious illnesses and deaths. The explanation has been more on the former -- government and health care leaders are in near panic that the number of cases will swamp the health care system in the next few weeks. (I could have written, "NEXT FEW WEEKS!") Less has been said about a lower infection rate resulting in fewer cases over, say, the next six-eight months. I suppose many are thinking that summer will bring some respite and that recurrence in the fall will be less consequential -- and that eventually we will have a vaccine.

    Another problem arrives after and if "social distancing" is done successfully now and in the next two weeks. Then the question is "For how long?" Are we prepared to fundamentally change our life and work for months and months?
    Sage Grouse

    ---------------------------------------
    'When I got on the bus for my first road game at Duke, I saw that every player was carrying textbooks or laptops. I coached in the SEC for 25 years, and I had never seen that before, not even once.' - David Cutcliffe to Duke alumni in Washington, DC, June 2013

  15. #1595
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    we've been asked to not get too into politics, but the WaPo and others have noted that for weeks the Fox luminaries like Hannity, Ingraham, Pirro et al (and Newt) have adamantly downplayed the threat of Covid 19, but that seems to be changing, Newt has done a 180...he's in Italy, his wife is ambassador to the Holy See ...and Tucker Carlson had a heart to heart with the Prez to the effect that the threat is real.

  16. #1596
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn.Devil.91.92.01.10.15 View Post
    Was actually Romney's proposal.
    everyone loves being bombarded with money, so the Gov sending out cash will be a hit, but seriously, a thousand bucks will not get me to spend more...I don't think the problem is that people are lacking money, they're fearful of the unknown.
    As such, much of the $$ would likely be saved, (maybe some bills paid). And by the way, I don't think Romney's proposal was $1k/month, it was just $1k (per family? person? not clear). I hope they have my correct address...

    https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2...an-andrew-yang

    edit: ok, Romney proposed $1k per adult...my dog will be three in a month, does that qualify?

  17. #1597
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.

    Now It's Getting Real

    Outer Banks to close to tourists: https://www.darenc.com/departments/e...nagement/entry

  18. #1598
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by budwom View Post
    everyone loves being bombarded with money, so the Gov sending out cash will be a hit, but seriously, a thousand bucks will not get me to spend more...I don't think the problem is that people are lacking money, they're fearful of the unknown.
    As such, much of the $$ would likely be saved, (maybe some bills paid). And by the way, I don't think Romney's proposal was $1k/month, it was just $1k (per family? person? not clear). I hope they have my correct address...
    it will help folks with paying some bills though if they are out of work or if their income is reduced even if working.

    The amount is not set, nor is the cut-off in income (if any) and whether there will be some phasing in between the "haves" (whatever that is) and the "have nots" (whatever that is). It won't be a quick process.

    (For those interested in the details of the Congressional workings on this and other bills, I highly recommend following Jake Sherman of Politico on Twitter. He has a lot up on this already.)

  19. #1599
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Winston-Salem
    Quote Originally Posted by budwom View Post
    everyone loves being bombarded with money, so the Gov sending out cash will be a hit, but seriously, a thousand bucks will not get me to spend more...I don't think the problem is that people are lacking money, they're fearful of the unknown.
    As such, much of the $$ would likely be saved, (maybe some bills paid). And by the way, I don't think Romney's proposal was $1k/month, it was just $1k (per family? person? not clear). I hope they have my correct address...

    https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2...an-andrew-yang

    edit: ok, Romney proposed $1k per adult...my dog will be three in a month, does that qualify?
    3 * 7 = 21. Buy that pup a beer!

  20. #1600
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Quote Originally Posted by OldPhiKap View Post
    it will help folks with paying some bills though if they are out of work or if their income is reduced even if working.

    The amount is not set, nor is the cut-off in income (if any) and whether there will be some phasing in between the "haves" (whatever that is) and the "have nots" (whatever that is). It won't be a quick process.

    (For those interested in the details of the Congressional workings on this and other bills, I highly recommend following Jake Sherman of Politico on Twitter. He has a lot up on this already.)
    yeah, it has hardly been settled yet. I am 100% in for helping out people whose jobs have been whacked, less enthusiastic about the carpet bombing approach. Target those who need it.

    p.s. how far off could a "401-K Rejuvenation Bill" possibly be?

Similar Threads

  1. Masters 2020
    By OldPhiKap in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 175
    Last Post: 11-20-2020, 09:24 PM
  2. 2020 NBA Playoffs
    By cato in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 1349
    Last Post: 10-17-2020, 11:29 PM
  3. Coronavirus - those we've lost
    By JasonEvans in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 05-08-2020, 09:42 PM
  4. FB: 2020 Schedule is out
    By nocilla in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 01-22-2020, 07:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •