Against my better judgement I’m going to post this reply, but I’m not going to get into a long drawn out debate. Just offering this opinion while, respectfully, acknowledging those here that may not agree with me.
To be clear, I was not trying to place any blame on anyone who is obese by posting that link, just pointing out the facts, as determined by the CDC, on who this virus is the most dangerous for.
Blaming anyone other than those who allowed the virus to spread in the first place is pointless and not productive to facing the issue at hand.
Not sure how it goes from me posting a CDC study, to me defending my compassion for others, but I guess it is the internet after all.
You stated, “The obesity did not put them in the hospital, or flood their lungs with pus or cause coagulopathies”.
That’s true, the COVID 19 virus initiated that. But to ignore, or not focus on, obesity as a huge contributing factor as to why our hospitals are overwhelmed and death rates are high is not facing an unpleasant problem directly.
I don’t think we’ve, as a society, put enough emphasis on the elevated dangers of being overweight and COVID was my sole point by sharing that study link.
I feel as compassionate as you for those facing severe health issues, all races and weights, due to this virus, and wish I had the answer on to how to stop it.
A client of mine is an infectious disease doctor, PHD at an Ivy League school. He’s in the forefront studying COVID and how it relates to blood types. He made a comment to me that, at some point, he thinks everyone will get, or has had, COVID…it’s that infectious.
We can’t stop it.
If that’s the case, it seems to me that maybe we should accept that fact as a country, and change how we approach dealing with COVID. We need to become more laser focused on protecting those most at risk, like the elderly, the obese, and those with these co-morbidity issues while building natural immunity, along with the help of vaccines, with the rest of society as they go about daily life.
We need to go forward with living as best we can.
In case there is any doubt, I believe we should all get vaccinated. I believe we should all quarantine if we don’t feel well.
But we have to move forward with no fear.
The studies show most adults and kids are not at great risk of death. We should take confidence from that fact. Let’s be optimistic, not pessimistic all the time.
Unfortunately, life is not fair, and we can’t eliminate all risk.
We also can’t shut this entire country down. We just can’t. It’s not a practical solution to this Covid problem we all face and we are creating other huge problems by attempting this course of action.
Let’s drop the political nature of all this, from both sides of the aisle, and totally focus on helping those that the science has shown are at the greatest risk. Let’s accept that we simply can’t protect everyone from this virus and just do the best we can.
In short, let’s try to work together and focus on the heart of the problem…those most at risk from something we can’t control…and get society back on track.
Last edited by Wheat/"/"/"; 08-26-2021 at 08:51 PM.
Thanks for your explanations. Let's find some areas where we agree
1. Everyone should get vaccinated. If for no other reason, then to show compassion to others by limiting our risk to others during our interactions in a normalizing society
2. Certain risk factors make COVID more dangerous for some. Some of these are unknowns- such as possible unknown genetic conditions like Von Willebrand, or G6PD Deficiency, some are unavoidable medical phenomenon- cancer, asthma, autoimmune disorders, familial hypertension, and some might be issues that the medical community have tried for decades to address, such as obesity, smoking, alcohol use. I would propose that Primary care has been obsessed with finding answers for these "preventable" conditions long before COVID arrived
3. As a nation, and an economic people, we will overcome this better when we can control the inevitable waves that threaten our medical resources as COVID reaches out and touches every person. When ICU care is overwhelmed, we as a compassionate society should respond, or predict a response, and do everything we can to limit the effect of that wave, which may include increased use of masks, or other preventive measures.
Would this seem like common ground?
I would just state that many of us feel that COVID is not "something we can't control" as we see different responses in various states that have widely effects regarding the new Delta variant. I would propose that we can protect those at risk best, by doing everything we can to limit its spread to any of us, including those at most risk until 1. Hospital resources, including staff, can adequately respond and 2. further therapeutics are developed. As always, we probably share more ideas in common than we realize.
Thanks for the reasoned reply. We’re not that far apart, and have plenty of common ground.
We all want what’s best for everyone. It’s finding the acceptable balance between how we respond to a serious issue like Covid, and the unintended creation of even more problems that’s the difficult part for us all.
I agree with most of what to say. But I would classify "living in fear" as very politicized language. It insinuates thst being careful and following science is fearful. And supposes reckless behavior is somehow "brave."
Not wearing a mask isn't brave. I see a lot of indignant folks out there who take great pride in not being intimidated into wearing masks. That's just dumb and/or ill-informed.
Calling people who are being careful with their own health and the well-being of loved ones "scared" is wildly myopic.
BMI should never be used to label a person overweight or obese on an individual level and we all keep doing it. It was designed to be a population measure. The levels used to determine the labels "overweight" and "obese" were normalized to young males in the first place.
Overweight is not obese (and the 80% was people who were overweight or obese). There have been enough studies where overweight people fared better than underweight people (yeah, I want to see most of them reproduced, but that finding has happened and it's happened more than once). The CDC report included overweight with obese in the 80%.
So, when I see results reporting that overweight and obesity this or overweight and obesity that, first of all, I want to see if they used BMI to determine who is overweight/obese, then if they did that - which they shouldn't - I want to see if they age adjusted the definitions of overweight and obese, which they should. If they didn't do either of those things, then one must take the results with a grain of salt and not make sweeping statements because, as I said in a previous post, there are other factors that are associated with obesity as defined by BMI and it is high time we started looking at those factors instead of deciding that everything is linked to obesity instead of trying to parse out the factors that are associated with obesity.
Quality of care for obese people lags behind the non obese. We do not, in general, provide the same level of medical care to the obese. We don't know all the reasons. Addressing the problem is a relatively new area of quality of care research, but a fairly significant problem seems to be bias on the part of the doctors who care for them. Medical professionals expect the obese to do worse and consequently do not give as much time/attention to their cases. (More research is needed.)
Back to studying covid, given the distribution of hospitalizations and death by age, any study that tries to look at obesity alone is flawed. You cannot look at obesity alone, you have to adjust for age unless you are looking only at a cohort of people who are roughly the same age.
Saying people are living their lives because there aren't stay at home orders isn't saying that much. I guess everyone can gauge what they're comfortable with and act accordingly, but I'm looking forward to the time again when my 4 year old is allowed to talk at lunch and stick his tongue out for the first snowfall. Let alone taking them to restaurants and traveling like I used to love to do...I agree that there is a balance and we cannot stop living our lives forever. I think once vaccines are approved for the kiddos, I hope to live my life again...I admit I do live in some "fear" despite being fully vaccinated, young and healthy. It's not always the most logical but is hard to have a mindset shift. And my local community is 85% vaccinated...(most everybody was still wearing a mask and the town started mandating it this week, with the state following up with its own mandate starting next week).
Hi All!
I have a school project…
Anybody have thoughts on the decline trust in important institutions like the government, the media, the medical establishment, business (big and small), the Internet, and on and on.
Thoughts on why, psychologically, this has happened and, more important, the impact it has on ourselves and our society. Any thoughts on how trust can be rebuilt?
Suggestions welcome!!
Last night's Seth Meyers A Closer Look on Ivermectin was pretty darn funny...
Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?
I'd say that everything outlined in that sentence is BECAUSE of the internet. A whole lot of people who don't have a clue what they are talking about were given a voice, which led to more people not knowing anything about what they are listening to believing the words of the first group.
Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."