Page 9 of 30 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 180 of 588
  1. #161
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by Neals384 View Post
    Whoa there, Reilly. I hate to crash your Sooner Schooner, but it would be 1 Ohio State; 2 Clemson; 3 LSU; and 7 Oregon. Go Ducks!
    (i.e. “Okay, Boomer Sooner”)

  2. #162
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    1. LSU
    2. Ohio State
    3. Clemson
    4. Oklahoma
    Bob Green

  3. #163
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Green View Post
    1. LSU
    2. Ohio State
    3. Clemson
    4. Oklahoma
    The Committee got it exactly right, IMO.

  4. #164
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Quote Originally Posted by Stray Gator View Post
    The Committee got it exactly right, IMO.
    I agree.
    Bob Green

  5. #165
    Quote Originally Posted by Stray Gator View Post
    The Committee got it exactly right, IMO.
    Well, that's no fun.

  6. #166
    Quote Originally Posted by OldPhiKap View Post
    (i.e. “Okay, Boomer Sooner”)
    Clever.

    Gosh, I really do not like that expression. Probably because a friend of mine continually uses it against me, even though I am too young to be a baby boomer. Soooo annoying.

    By the way, LSU is going to beat Oklahoma by double digits. Not exactly a hot take, I know. I have no clue about Ohio State versus Clemson. It should be a truly great game — worthy of being a the National Championship game.

  7. #167
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Quote Originally Posted by Steven43 View Post
    Clever.

    Gosh, I really do not like that expression. Probably because a friend of mine continually uses it against me, even though I am too young to be a baby boomer. Soooo annoying.
    Boomer Sooner has nothing to do with baby boomer. Two unrelated terms.
    Bob Green

  8. #168
    No, Bob, OPK wrote “Okay Boomer” (and added “Sooner” to be clever). You have heard this phrase recently, no? I assumed that’s what he was doing. Maybe I incorrectly gave him credit. If so, my bad.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OK_Boomer

  9. #169
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Quote Originally Posted by Steven43 View Post
    No, Bob, OPK wrote “Okay Boomer” (and added “Sooner” to be clever). You have heard this phrase recently, no? I assumed that’s what he was doing. Maybe I incorrectly gave him credit. If so, my bad.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OK_Boomer
    Oops. I missed it.
    Bob Green

  10. #170
    Quote Originally Posted by Steven43 View Post
    Clever.

    Gosh, I really do not like that expression. Probably because a friend of mine continually uses it against me, even though I am too young to be a baby boomer. Soooo annoying.

    By the way, LSU is going to beat Oklahoma by double digits. Not exactly a hot take, I know. I have no clue about Ohio State versus Clemson. It should be a truly great game — worthy of being a the National Championship game.
    I think Ohio State is going to romp too depending on Fields health.

  11. #171
    Quote Originally Posted by kshepinthehouse View Post
    I think Ohio State is going to romp too depending on Fields health.
    Really? You think Ohio State is going to beat Clemson handily? Hmm, I don’t know about that. I think it’s going to be an exciting and close game. Clemson has a HUGE coaching advantage. It would be a mistake to discount that.

  12. #172
    Quote Originally Posted by Stray Gator View Post
    The Committee got it exactly right, IMO.
    They got it almost exactly right. Switch two and three and they would have it exactly right. I think Clemson will win in a competitive game against OSU.

  13. #173
    Quote Originally Posted by kshepinthehouse View Post
    I think Ohio State is going to romp too depending on Fields health.
    Wow! No faith in Clemson huh? I guess the previous two out of three championships isn’t enough for you to respect them. OK, we will see. A Clemson romp would not surprise me. But neither would a semi-close win by Clemson. Anything involving a Buckeye’s victory other than a very close win would totally surprise me. A romp by them? Can’t see it at all.
    Last edited by SouthernDukie; 12-08-2019 at 02:13 PM.

  14. #174
    Quote Originally Posted by Stray Gator View Post
    The Committee got it exactly right, IMO.
    And they're very happy that
    LSU romped
    Ohio State struggled but won
    Clemson romped
    Oklahoma won.

    Made it easier than it could have been...

  15. #175
    It’s such a shame that we have a bunch of idiots voting in the AP poll. What fools. Five of the Top 10 teams are from the pathetic SEC. Only one from the dominant and best conference, the big ten. Will those AP fools never learn?

  16. #176

    annoying homerism

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernDukie View Post
    It’s such a shame that we have a bunch of idiots voting in the AP poll. What fools. Five of the Top 10 teams are from the pathetic SEC. Only one from the dominant and best conference, the big ten. Will those AP fools never learn?
    At least you have been consistent with your Dixie bias. I like LSU and agree that they pass the eye test. So does Clemson, but they are untested this year.

    OSU is the first team in the CFP era to win 9 conference games and their conference championship. And they didn't schedule an FBS team, not UNCC and Wofford.

    The computers LOVE OSU. Here's something different than the eye test to chew on...

    Current Sagarin-PREDICTOR ratings:

    Ohio State [#1, 106.22]
    Clemson [#2, 101.25]
    LSU [#4, 98.27]
    Oklahoma [#6, 92.81]

    Projected pointspreads for the possible combinations of those teams are:

    OSU -5 vs Clemson
    OSU -8 vs LSU
    OSU -13 vs Oklahoma
    Clemson -3 vs LSU
    Clemson -8 vs Oklahoma
    LSU -5 vs Oklahoma

    I hope the Buckeyes burst your bubble like they did in the first CFP.
    Last edited by Buckminsterfuller; 12-08-2019 at 03:05 PM. Reason: additional information

  17. #177
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Quote Originally Posted by Buckminsterfuller View Post

    I hope the Buckeyes burst your bubble like they did in the first CFP.
    I’ll be rooting for Clemson to put a beat down on the Buckeyes. Go ACC!
    Bob Green

  18. #178
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Green View Post
    I’ll be rooting for Clemson to put a beat down on the Buckeyes. Go ACC!
    Yea one more beatdown & Big whatever/PAC 12 should withdraw from BCS to emphasize the Rose Bowl. This was actually opined in WSJ years ago and now I think time has come. Less embarrassment for those two small time conferences😂

  19. #179
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hot'Lanta... home of the Falcons!
    Quote Originally Posted by Buckminsterfuller View Post
    Current Sagarin-PREDICTOR ratings:

    Ohio State [#1, 106.22]
    Clemson [#2, 101.25]
    LSU [#4, 98.27]
    Oklahoma [#6, 92.81]

    Projected pointspreads for the possible combinations of those teams are:

    OSU -5 vs Clemson
    OSU -8 vs LSU
    OSU -13 vs Oklahoma
    Clemson -3 vs LSU
    Clemson -8 vs Oklahoma
    LSU -5 vs Oklahoma
    Look, I love me some computer generated pointspreads and all, but if you can find me LSU -5 against Oklahoma I have a LOT OF MONEY to bet on that. And when tOSU and LSU play for the title, LSU plus 8 is extremely attractive.

    -Jason "no sportsbook in the world would publish those lines... LSU is gonna be more like 10-12 points over OK" Evans
    Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?

  20. #180
    Quote Originally Posted by duke2x View Post
    That poll also thinks 6-6 UNC is better than 9-4 UVA, 8-4 Wake, 8-4 VT, and 7-5 Pittsburgh. I've seen all of those teams in person. My eye test agrees with the scoreboard result that X > UNC.

    What do the composite rankings say that are posted on here? Having 20+ polls helps, but a major problem with football computer rankings is the limited sample size. College football scheduling is a good topic but way beyond the scope of this thread.
    Quote Originally Posted by Neals384 View Post
    Whoa there, Reilly. I hate to crash your Sooner Schooner, but it would be 1 Ohio State; 2 Clemson; 3 LSU; and 7 Oregon. Go Ducks!
    Thanks for catching Oregon over OU based on championship + higher ranking objective criteria. I'd take that.

    UNC 40, UVA 44 -- so, flip them. They're middling/good teams. Carolina's higher slot due to 1-point loss to Clemson as opposed to Virginia 1,400-point loss, I'm guessing. Having "champ + computer rating" is going to give the same outcome as the humans 85% of the time, in my wild-guess opinion. Just make it objective. LSU, Ohio State, and Clemson -- all agree on. Cases can be made for Oklahoma or Oregon -- just like in March cases can be made between some 19-13 Georgia team and a 23-5 UTEP team or whatever. Just let the computers decide (computers programmed by humans). Agree on the objective criteria ahead of time.

Similar Threads

  1. College Football Playoff 2018
    By Wander in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 210
    Last Post: 12-07-2018, 08:43 AM
  2. The College Football Playoff
    By Olympic Fan in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 333
    Last Post: 12-07-2016, 11:09 AM
  3. College Football Playoff 2015
    By Olympic Fan in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-06-2015, 02:48 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-15-2013, 12:38 AM
  5. Michael Kelly named COO for college football playoff.
    By jimsumner in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-19-2012, 10:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •