Is there a site or list that shows how many players from each ACC school has players in the transfer portal? I am not sure if our uptick is a sign of the program, a sign of the times, or an anomaly from a relatively small sample size.
Is there a site or list that shows how many players from each ACC school has players in the transfer portal? I am not sure if our uptick is a sign of the program, a sign of the times, or an anomaly from a relatively small sample size.
Does the same rule apply as in basketball that if you aren't a grad transfer you have to sit out a year? That makes for a long collegiate career if you have already redshirted at your first school.
Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."
I've seen it stated that Stanford has 15 guys in the portal...somewhat counterintuitively, I think maybe good academic schools have a lot of guys in the portal because most of their kids stay on a graduation track. Gagnon has also entered the portal for Duke, no big deal, he doesn't have ACC speed, but maybe he can get some time elsewhere.
The only guy in the portal who disappoints me is Brittain Brown, who can be very good when healthy (which is, admittedly, rarely).
Oh, Xander Gagnon has put his name in the transfer portal (now the total is 9). Not a major contributor, but yet another departure (another grad transfer).
With everyone entering this portal, we need to be looking at bringing transfers in. As much of a feel good story as it may be, giving 5 scholarships to walk ons and backup long snappers isn’t going to make us competitive.
I think the system is working well...players who aren't playing much are graduating or are on track to do so, and looking elsewhere for more playing time. This opens up a roster spot for coaches to fill with presumably/hopefully a player who can ultimately contribute more.
One of the things the wide use of grad-student transfers changes is the calculus on whether to redshirt true freshmen. Why hold them out if they're going to play their fifth year somewhere else?
Good question, but isn't one of the reasons of a redshirt during a player's first year to give them time to be physically ready for collegiate football? They go from being literally the big man on campus to the small fry. I thought lots of that redshirt year was about developing their skills as well as their bodies. If a player isn't physically ready, he's gonna get hurt, and then the point of his potential grad transfer may be moot.
Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."
Brown is the only one above a replacement level player. When I start seeing Casey Holman or Jalen Calhoun in the list this is pearl clutching at best. Our problem isn’t we are losing mediocre players it’s that we are recruiting almost all mediocre players. Cut raised our profile from mostly 2s to mostly 3s. While it has made a big jump in our record,our competition expects 4-5s just like Duke BB does. Coaching em up with the best of em , Cut has hidden the comparable level of our recruits vs most of our competitors. PS- I really do love all the kids on the team like LL teams I’ve coached. Unlike my LL teams these Duke teams haven’t been hit with the lightening bolt from God of comparable talent as our foes.
^ we absolutely do need more playmakers, that's for sure. Maybe some of the receivers will step up with new coaching, really hard to say.
Sage Grouse
---------------------------------------
'When I got on the bus for my first road game at Duke, I saw that every player was carrying textbooks or laptops. I coached in the SEC for 25 years, and I had never seen that before, not even once.' - David Cutcliffe to Duke alumni in Washington, DC, June 2013