Rich
"Failure is Not a Destination"
Coach K on the Dan Patrick Show, December 22, 2016
Let me suggest some ways to minimize the difficulties this season. "Home winning streak against unranked non-ACC opponents?" Just need to add -- "... decided in regulation.
Also, "Consecutive weeks in the Top Twelve."
Any others that worry you?
Kindly,
Sage
'I read Animal Farm as a boy'
You know who else can't agree on ten teams that deserve it more? The AP poll voters.
This week they voted 20 different teams into their Top 10, including #21 Houston and #22 Virginia. The only ranked teams to appear in no poll voter's Top 10 were the second-tier Big Ten teams: #18 Iowa, #20 Penn State, #23 Illinois, #24 Wisconsin, and #25 Michigan.
Furthermore, they voted 20 different teams outside of their Top 10, starting with #6 Kentucky. So what you see a weird collection of very diverse opinion (despite having a unanimous #1 Kansas). It's how Maryland can stay #9 after losing to #24 Michigan State, but Michigan State moves up 8 places to #16 because they beat #9 Maryland.
Duke starts a new streak in the top 10 at #10.
1 Kansas (28-3)
2 Gonzaga (29-2)
3 Dayton (29-2)
4 Florida State (26-5)
5 Baylor (26-4)
6 San Diego State (30-2)
7 Creighton (24-7)
8 Kentucky (25-6)
9 Michigan State (22-9)
10 Duke (25-6)
11 Villanova (24--7)
Only 6 points separate #9-11.
Can't see why Michigan State is ahead of us, even now, but whatever.
Sage Grouse
---------------------------------------
'When I got on the bus for my first road game at Duke, I saw that every player was carrying textbooks or laptops. I coached in the SEC for 25 years, and I had never seen that before, not even once.' - David Cutcliffe to Duke alumni in Washington, DC, June 2013
47 teams receiving votes in the AP poll, including Stephen F. Austin as the #26 team, as well as teams like East Tennessee State, Northern Iowa, Liberty, Richmond, Vermont, and Belmont.
2016 was the last time there were this many teams receiving votes in the equivalent week's poll.
Just be you. You is enough. - K, 4/5/10, 0:13.8 to play, 60-59 Duke.
You're all jealous hypocrites. - Titus on Laettner
You see those guys? Animals. They're animals. - SIU Coach Chris Lowery, on Duke
At the top, you are probably right. Both the B10 and the ACC have 3 teams in the top 15 according to KenPom (FSU, Duke, 'Ville; Mich St, OSU, Maryland). But that's where the similarities end.
In the top 40, the ACC still has only 3 teams. B10? 12 teams!!!
The B10 is muuuuuuch better than the ACC, and it isn't close this year.
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfils the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things. - Winston Churchill
President of the "Nolan Smith Should Have His Jersey in The Rafters" Club
I am going by the eye test. Lol. Based on my eyes, I don’t think the BIG stands out — other than MSU. They are legit. The other teams are good but I don’t see them as legitimate threats to win the whole thing. I am sure the stats are better than my ACC colored eyeballs.
You're not alone - I visit all the more active ACC boards and there's a strong contingent of people who straight up refuse to believe what all of the advanced stats indicate. The B1G is absolutely GREAT this year - they don't have much in the way of elite/top5/title contenders, but they are rife with top 25-30ish teams.
The numbers say they are LIGHT YEARS ahead of the ACC - they could get 8-10 teams in the tourney. B1G is even well in front of the B12 and BE, who are again a cut above the ACC (who is basically neck and neck with the P12 this year - yuck).
It seems like the hardcore ACC fans have a bit of a case of "SEC football-itis" this year. By that I mean they have that "we're always the best or close to the best" mindset, which while *usually* true, is just WAY off this season.
Yeah. The ACC has 3 tiers this year: 4 teams that could compete for a B10 title, 5 teams that would be bottom of the B10, and 6 teams - including UNC - that wouldn't be allowed to play in the B10 this year.
Folks rightly rip on the B10 year in, year out due to their underperformance in the dance. And this year, that may happen again. But let's not lie to ourselves that this conference is on par with the ACC; it's so much better.
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfils the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things. - Winston Churchill
President of the "Nolan Smith Should Have His Jersey in The Rafters" Club
Yes, that's why the B10 smashed the ACC 11-3 in the Challenge this year. Wait, that didn't happen? It was just 8-6?
I agree the ACC is down and the B10 is deeper, but I don't buy that the gap is so chasmic that the #11 or 12 team in the B10 is clearly better than the #5 team in the ACC, which seems to be the general group think consensus. Or, that Duke should be ranked behind Mich State, despite 3 fewer losses and a dominating win at Mich State, not to mention the Kansas win on a neutral court.