Originally Posted by
nmduke2001
Sure $11 million is A LOT of money but it’s not quite as much as you might think. The $11 million was pre-tax and pre agent fee. Portland has a max state tax rate of 9%. $11 million would put him at the 37% marginal fed rate for all but $600k since he is married (so let’s just overestimate and say he’s at 37% effective rate for all of it). Total tax due is approximately $5,060,000 ($11,000,000 *46%). That leaves him $5,940,000. Let’s say his agent is generous and only took $440k. That leaves Rodney with $5,500,000. Rodney is 27 years old. Let’s use a huge generalization and say that he should only take 3% annually because he potentially has 60+ years to make this money work for him. That works out to $165,000/year. If he invests it prudently, you could expect that the 3% withdrawal rate will not deplete the principal and that the principal will grow at a rate greater than 3% thus allowing Rodney to increase his yearly withdrawal because he is taking 3% of a bigger pie. In theory, this works just fine, but google “sequence of return risk”. If Rodney faces a few early bad years in the market, he’s quickly in bad shape. Also, we didn’t even discuss the tax on the $165k/year. It could be 15% capital gains or a higher income rate depending on how it is invested.
$11 million is a ton of money, but absent any other type of income to safely make it last a lifetime, Rodney might have to live an upper middle-class lifestyle. Just for fun, I ran a monte carlo analysis on a 28 year old with $5,500,000 taking $165k/year after tax and inflation with an allocation of 66% equities, 17% FI and 17% alternatives. They failed to reach age 90 with any money in 25% of the projections. However, in 75% of the scenarios he was fine and with taking $165k/year in over 50% of the scenarios he reached age 90 with over $31 million.