View Poll Results: Who will win the South

Voters
65. You may not vote on this poll
  • Virginia

    37 56.92%
  • Tennessee

    15 23.08%
  • Purdue

    6 9.23%
  • Kansas State

    1 1.54%
  • Wisconsin

    2 3.08%
  • Villanova

    2 3.08%
  • Cincinnati

    2 3.08%
  • Mississippi

    0 0%
  • Oklahoma

    0 0%
  • Iowa

    0 0%
  • St. Mary’s

    0 0%
  • Oregon

    0 0%
  • UC Irvine

    0 0%
  • Old Dominion

    0 0%
  • Colgate

    0 0%
Page 1 of 28 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 549
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    2019 South Region Thread (Virginia #1)

    Discuss the teams and predict who will win here.
    Just be you. You is enough. - K, 4/5/10, 0:13.8 to play, 60-59 Duke.

    You're all jealous hypocrites. - Titus on Laettner

    You see those guys? Animals. They're animals. - SIU Coach Chris Lowery, on Duke

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    This is the toughest to predict. Half of my brain says Virginia, my heart and the other half of my brain think the first half is an idiot. I'm also just not sold on Tennessee as a legit contender. There are a lot of weak teams and tournament chokers in the top half (by seed) of this bracket. Could see Cincinnati making it to the Final Four...will need some time to settle on my vote for this one.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    near the Thrillerdome in ATL

    Wahoo

    KSU and UT were both beaten last year by Loyola-Chicago and UVa plays similarly on offense and is better defensively. Plus K-State's best player was in a boot today on the selection show and his status is a ? for the next two weeks. So the Hoos break their glass ceiling.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    I know the poll is limited to 15 options, but if ever there were a time to gather votes for a 16 seed...

    Not much discussion yet, but I just wanted to point out that almost all discussion of and hand-wringing about Virginia's region last year was rendered moot quickly, and not just because of UMBC. Remember all that stuff about "It's so unfair that Virginia gets Kentucky and Arizona in the same half of their bracket"? That was funny. Arizona lost to Buffalo. Kentucky ended up playing its Sweet 16 game against the team that beat the team that beat Virginia, and Kentucky lost. I'm pretty sure no one, in DBR or the rest of the planet, took one look at the bracket on Selection Sunday and said "Kansas State should look out for Loyola Chicago."

    It's a bit of a do-over with Virginia and Kansas State once again in the top half, and Cincinnati and Tennessee in the bottom half, but nobody knows anything.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    First round schedule/Kenpom odds for the South:

    Thursday
    [26]Villanova (-1) vs. [31]St. Mary's (7:20, TBS)
    [10]Purdue (-13) vs. [112]Old Dominion (9:50, TBS)

    Friday
    [32]Cincinnati (-1) vs. [36]Iowa (12:15, CBS)
    [44]Mississippi (+1) vs. [38]Oklahoma (12:40, TruTV)
    [23]Kansas State (-6) vs. [75]UC Irvine (2:00, TBS)
    [8]Tennessee (-15) vs. [129]Colgate (2:45, CBS)
    [1]Virginia (-22) vs. [167]Gardner-Webb (3:10, TruTV)
    [12]Wisconsin (-5) vs. [43]Oregon (4:30, TBS)
    Just be you. You is enough. - K, 4/5/10, 0:13.8 to play, 60-59 Duke.

    You're all jealous hypocrites. - Titus on Laettner

    You see those guys? Animals. They're animals. - SIU Coach Chris Lowery, on Duke

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Dur'm
    People (not so much DBR, but pundits) seem to be gun-shy about picking Virginia, given recent history. I think they're going to be playing with a (very disciplined) chip on their shoulder and looking for a Duke rematch. I think this is the year to fear UVA.
    Last edited by Phredd3; 03-18-2019 at 12:57 PM. Reason: Clarifying which people.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NC Raised, DC Resident
    Quote Originally Posted by pfrduke View Post
    First round schedule/Kenpom odds for the South:

    Thursday
    [26]Villanova (-1) vs. [31]St. Mary's (7:20, TBS)
    [10]Purdue (-13) vs. [112]Old Dominion (9:50, TBS)

    Friday
    [32]Cincinnati (-1) vs. [36]Iowa (12:15, CBS)
    [44]Mississippi (+1) vs. [38]Oklahoma (12:40, TruTV)
    [23]Kansas State (-6) vs. [75]UC Irvine (2:00, TBS)
    [8]Tennessee (-15) vs. [129]Colgate (2:45, CBS)
    [1]Virginia (-22) vs. [167]Gardner-Webb (3:10, TruTV)
    [12]Wisconsin (-5) vs. [43]Oregon (4:30, TBS)
    So, 5-out-of-8 of these matchups are single-digit KenPom spreads, and 3 are single-point spreads? Sheesh. I would definitely not have guessed that coming in. The NCAAT does kooky things to teams that don't seem all that close in quality, so when they ARE close...look out.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by pfrduke View Post
    First round schedule/Kenpom odds for the South:

    Thursday
    [26]Villanova (-1) vs. [31]St. Mary's (7:20, TBS)
    [10]Purdue (-13) vs. [112]Old Dominion (9:50, TBS)

    Friday
    [32]Cincinnati (-1) vs. [36]Iowa (12:15, CBS)
    [44]Mississippi (+1) vs. [38]Oklahoma (12:40, TruTV)
    [23]Kansas State (-6) vs. [75]UC Irvine (2:00, TBS)
    [8]Tennessee (-15) vs. [129]Colgate (2:45, CBS)
    [1]Virginia (-22) vs. [167]Gardner-Webb (3:10, TruTV)
    [12]Wisconsin (-5) vs. [43]Oregon (4:30, TBS)
    This lines up quite nicely with my upset predictions...very comforting.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    People (not so much DBR, but pundits) seem to be gun-shy about picking Virginia, given recent history. I think they're going to be playing with a (very disciplined) chip on their shoulder and looking for a Duke rematch. I think this is the year to fear UVA.
    I'm one of those people, although I'm a Chicken Little even under good circumstances. A lot of it was the way they looked against FSU. Losing to FSU is nothing to be ashamed of, but they went into UMBC mode pretty early. There were about nine minutes left when Kyle Guy went barreling into an FSU defender looking to make a 10-point basket, and Jerome had some awful out-of-rhythm threes at the end (although those were late enough that he didn't have much choice). It was by far the worst I've seen them look this year.

    Factor in that they haven't played two good halves against a decent opponent since...UNC in February? The "slow start and come back in the second half" tendencies seem to be playing with fire, and if they let Gardner-Webb hang around for a while, the pressure will really start to mount.

    I'll feel a lot better if they can get through the opening weekend. That's when I think the pressure would lift.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    People (not so much DBR, but pundits) seem to be gun-shy about picking Virginia, given recent history. I think they're going to be playing with a (very disciplined) chip on their shoulder and looking for a Duke rematch. I think this is the year to fear UVA.
    They may have a chip on their shoulder, but the question has always been whether their style of play can be effective in a tournament setting, where the pace automatically slows down and having guards who can create offense is so crucial. Three point shooting in large, unfamiliar arenas also tends to be more difficult. And when they fall behind they have a harder time coming back since lulling their opponents to sleep no longer works.

    I do think that UVA has more of a traditional offense this season than in years past, but you can’t blame fans for taking a wait-and-see approach when it comes to their tournament success.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by UrinalCake View Post
    I do think that UVA has more of a traditional offense this season than in years past, but you can’t blame fans for taking a wait-and-see approach when it comes to their tournament success.
    Definitely understand the wait-and-see approach by other fanbases. I definitely do the same when it comes to other teams. Fortunately, what people do in their brackets has no bearing on the actual outcome of games. In addition, if UVA does have a strong run in the tourney this year, I'll probably also win my brackets. It'll either be a win-win or a lose-lose situation for me.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Atlanta
    Quote Originally Posted by jhmoss1812 View Post
    Definitely understand the wait-and-see approach by other fanbases. I definitely do the same when it comes to other teams. Fortunately, what people do in their brackets has no bearing on the actual outcome of games. In addition, if UVA does have a strong run in the tourney this year, I'll probably also win my brackets. It'll either be a win-win or a lose-lose situation for me.
    In the metaphysical and quantum physics worlds can you really be sure about that?

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by BandAlum83 View Post
    In the metaphysical and quantum physics worlds can you really be sure about that?
    I guess not lol. I almost put a question mark after that sentence instead of a period too.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Dur'm
    Quote Originally Posted by UrinalCake View Post
    I do think that UVA has more of a traditional offense this season than in years past, but you can’t blame fans for taking a wait-and-see approach when it comes to their tournament success.
    No blame assigned. I was simply expressing my (apparently) contrary view. And my sympathy lies especially with the UVA fan base. I know when examining the Duke draw, I look for demons around every bracket corner. After last year, UVA fans must be especially prone to finding such demons, even where they are least probable!

  15. #15
    Here's something for the thread: If you ARE gun shy about picking UVA to the Final Four, go with a deep sleeper. Since 2014, UVA has been a 1 seed 4 times, a 2 seed once, and a 5 seed once. Here are the winners of those regions:

    2014 - UVA 1 seed, region won by UConn (7 seed)
    2015 - UVA 2 seed, region won by Michigan (7 seed)
    2016 - UVA 1 seed, region won by Cuse (10 seed)
    2017 - UVA 5 seed, region won by South Carolina (7 seed)
    2018 - UVA 1 seed, region won by Loyola (11 seed)
    2019 - UVA 1 seed, region won by..... ?

    FYI - the 7 seed in the South this year is Cinci.... I'm just sayin' if you're a "trends" degenerate.... there MIGHT be some value there.


    ***FYI, while I don't charge for my picks, I'm happy to receive a 5% "finders fee" of your winnings ;-)

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Dur'm
    QED.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Atlanta
    Quote Originally Posted by Wahoo2000 View Post
    Here's something for the thread: If you ARE gun shy about picking UVA to the Final Four, go with a deep sleeper. Since 2014, UVA has been a 1 seed 4 times, a 2 seed once, and a 5 seed once. Here are the winners of those regions:

    2014 - UVA 1 seed, region won by UConn (7 seed)
    2015 - UVA 2 seed, region won by Michigan (7 seed)
    2016 - UVA 1 seed, region won by Cuse (10 seed)
    2017 - UVA 5 seed, region won by South Carolina (7 seed)
    2018 - UVA 1 seed, region won by Loyola (11 seed)
    2019 - UVA 1 seed, region won by.... ?

    FYI - the 7 seed in the South this year is Cinci... I'm just sayin' if you're a "trends" degenerate... there MIGHT be some value there.


    ***FYI, while I don't charge for my picks, I'm happy to receive a 5% "finders fee" of your winnings ;-)
    In the immortal words of the fictional Spock: "Fascinating"

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Phredd3 View Post
    No blame assigned. I was simply expressing my (apparently) contrary view. And my sympathy lies especially with the UVA fan base. I know when examining the Duke draw, I look for demons around every bracket corner. After last year, UVA fans must be especially prone to finding such demons, even where they are least probable!
    You should check out our home board. It's beyond comical. It's not PackPride bad but the paranoia is sky high.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by jhmoss1812 View Post
    You should check out our home board. It's beyond comical. It's not PackPride bad but the paranoia is sky high.
    Indeed. The proverbial cat in a room full of rocking chairs is in a coma by comparison.

    The tension is packed so tightly it has fused diamond-like and is uncut-able.

    ....crickets....

    Ok, I think that's enough awful jokes for me... must be the nerves.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Atlanta
    Quote Originally Posted by Wahoo2000 View Post
    Indeed. The proverbial cat in a room full of rocking chairs is in a coma by comparison.

    The tension is packed so tightly it has fused diamond-like and is uncut-able.

    ...crickets...

    Ok, I think that's enough awful jokes for me... must be the nerves.
    Do you guys hang out on the UVA boards much, or is this your preferred location for talking college hoops?

Similar Threads

  1. 2019 East Region Thread (Duke #1)
    By pfrduke in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 303
    Last Post: 04-01-2019, 11:01 AM
  2. NCAA South collector thread (Virginia #1 seed, Cincy #2)
    By JasonEvans in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 646
    Last Post: 03-23-2018, 03:01 PM
  3. NCAAT: South Region Discussion Thread (Kansas/Nova)
    By JBDuke in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 03-27-2016, 10:59 AM
  4. South/Atlanta region discussion (Kentucky #1)
    By hurleyfor3 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 312
    Last Post: 03-25-2012, 07:13 PM
  5. March Madness conversation: SOUTH Region
    By JasonEvans in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-23-2008, 04:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •